Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 57
  1. #26
    Banned
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    49,723
    ^still doesn't get it... poor little fella
    Went right over your head as usual, wow~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  2. #27
    Banned
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    49,723
    I suppose it's just a coincidence that New England's fumbles were reduced greatly after the "supposed" deflations began?
    It's not real obvious these Pat teams are simply good? What are you a rookie?

    It could be flag football, touch football, Arena football, play up in Canada, it wouldn't matter the Pats would still be who they are. Anyone not seeing that has no business trying to talk with those of us who do get it.

  3. #28
    The judges here basically agreed that the suspension is a ridiculous penalty for a still unproven crime, but that Goodell has the authority to do what the he wants under the current CBA.
    And that -- the players likely desire, in negotiating the next CBA, to strip the Commissioner of a power he's wielded pretty capriciously throughout his tenure -- will likely cause the next work stoppage in a major sport.

  4. #29
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Baltimore Ravens
    Post Count
    76,319
    I suppose it's just a coincidence that New England's fumbles were reduced greatly after the "supposed" deflations began?
    Huh, amazing they only went after Brady then and not the running backs.

  5. #30
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    28,727
    It's not real obvious these Pat teams are simply good? What are you a rookie?

    It could be flag football, touch football, Arena football, play up in Canada, it wouldn't matter the Pats would still be who they are. Anyone not seeing that has no business trying to talk with those of us who do get it.
    Wrong. A player is less likely to fumble a football that is underinflated. That is what was going on here.

  6. #31
    mah brane hertz Wes Welker's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Giants
    Post Count
    82
    I suppose it's just a coincidence that New England's fumbles were reduced greatly after the "supposed" deflations began?
    Well that explains the Pats' massive jump in fumbles last season with normally inflated footballs that were checked by the league - oh wait, their fumble numbers hardly changed at all.

  7. #32
    36/7/7
    My Team
    Baltimore Ravens
    Post Count
    5,892
    ^still doesn't get it... poor little fella

  8. #33
    Banned
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    49,723
    Wrong. A player is less likely to fumble a football that is underinflated. That is what was going on here.
    So the only reason the Pats have done what they have in the Belichick/Brady era is because of PSI in footballs, right?

    Come on guy, hahaha~~~~~~~~~~

  9. #34
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    Oakland Raiders
    Post Count
    96,368
    ^still doesn't get it... poor little fella

  10. #35
    Damns (Given): 0 Blake's Avatar
    My Team
    Baltimore Ravens
    Post Count
    76,319
    Well we all know how this thread is about to go

  11. #36
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    28,727
    Well that explains the Pats' massive jump in fumbles last season with normally inflated footballs that were checked by the league - oh wait, their fumble numbers hardly changed at all.
    They always underinflated the balls. They just finally got caught.

  12. #37
    Banned
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    49,723
    Brady and the Pats have had 13 10 or more wins a season. That is only done because of superior play.

  13. #38
    Banned
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    49,723
    They always underinflated the balls. They just finally got caught.
    So how many of those SB wins were only because of footballs, well?

  14. #39
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    Oakland Raiders
    Post Count
    96,368
    ^still doesn't get it... poor little fella
    you keep acting like the important matter here is "if they got an advantage from deflating the footballs"

    that's not relevant at all at this point

  15. #40
    mah brane hertz Wes Welker's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Giants
    Post Count
    82
    They always underinflated the balls. They just finally got caught.
    Then why didn't their fumble totals rise dramatically last season?

  16. #41
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    28,727
    Then why didn't their fumble totals rise dramatically last season?
    Low PSI.

  17. #42
    ex Hornets78 Pelicans78's Avatar
    My Team
    New Orleans Saints
    Post Count
    15,822
    Brady and the Pats have had 13 10 or more wins a season. That is only done because of superior play.
    That isn't the point you dumbass.

  18. #43
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Oilers
    Post Count
    40,714
    That isn't the point you dumbass.
    In b4 you spend 2 days arguing in circles

  19. #44
    Banned
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    49,723
    That isn't the point you dumbass.
    I know that dummy, tell those who think the only reason the Pats win is because they cheat.

    Stuff like.
    lol cheatriots
    lol belicheat
    lol tom cheat
    lol illegitimate les
    lol can't win without cheating

    You really didn't pick up on that, damn you're dumb.

    Dude, how obvious does something have to be, well?

  20. #45
    mah brane hertz Wes Welker's Avatar
    My Team
    New York Giants
    Post Count
    82
    The NFL checked PSI last season. Why didn't their fumble numbers go up?

  21. #46
    Veteran Raven's Avatar
    My Team
    New England Patriots
    Post Count
    17,101
    Wrong. A player is less likely to fumble a football that is underinflated. That is what was going on here.
    yes, i'm sure it has everything to do with that, and nothing to do with the fact that the pats kick you straight out of the door if you fumble... also nothing with the fact that they don't keep fast agile rbs but strictly straight line plodders for short yardage

  22. #47
    Veteran Raven's Avatar
    My Team
    New England Patriots
    Post Count
    17,101
    you keep acting like the important matter here is "if they got an advantage from deflating the footballs"

    that's not relevant at all at this point
    i'm pretty sure there is nothing relevant in this story.. it's just a joke tbh

  23. #48
    Veteran
    My Team
    Denver Broncos
    Post Count
    12,134
    I don't care if he's suspended or not, I just don't want to hear about deflategate anymore.

    As an aside, Brady has grown on me the last few years. Maybe it's because he hasn't consistently been dominating my team like he used to but I think that guy gets unfairly ed.

  24. #49
    Bosshog in the cut djohn2oo8's Avatar
    My Team
    Houston Texans
    Post Count
    37,317
    I don't care if he's suspended or not, I just don't want to hear about deflategate anymore.

    As an aside, Brady has grown on me the last few years. Maybe it's because he hasn't consistently been dominating my team like he used to but I think that guy gets unfairly ed.
    unfairly.

  25. #50
    Veteran
    My Team
    Denver Broncos
    Post Count
    12,134
    Alright, you are correct. That was dumb of me to say.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •