Reply With Quote
I'm good with equal vetting of all refugees. You just wanna extra vet the Muslim ones.
Pretty ridiculous.
You'd be impeding the free exercise of said religion. Pretty simple stuff, lawyer.
I'm good with equal vetting of all refugees. You just wanna extra vet the Muslim ones.
Pretty ridiculous.
If they aren't in the US they don't have first amendment rights. Easy enough.
They already are here.
Not the ones your girl Hillary wants to bring in.
We're not talking about refugees. We're talking about Islam itself.
It's already here. What do you want to do about it other than crap your pants when you see a Muslim at the grocery store?
you. You are the one that needs a diaper change.
You are right. A bunch are here already. A certain percentage are radicalized and will continue to kill Americans and in turn get killed themselves. Stop the inflow unless 110% vetted and secure and we will eventually wed out the ed up ones.
Today's Islam
Do you have any legal authority that supports your claim that President Obama calling ISIS an islamic organization impedes the free exercise of islam? Or that having an adult conversation about Islam violates the free exercise of religion?
You do realize there are limits on free exercise? I'd love to hear your explanation why cases like Employment Division v. Smith don't allow Obama to criticize those muslims who believe the punishment for apostasy is death?
You failed to answer my only question. Why do you think it is a good idea to bring in more Muslim refugees?
Apparently Blake thinks criminal soliciation laws don't apply to Muslims.
It is a permissible reading of the [free exercise clause]...to say that if prohibiting the exercise of religion is not the object of the [law] but merely the incidental effect of a generally applicable and otherwise valid provision, the First Amendment has not been offended.... To make an individual's obligation to obey such a law contingent upon the law's coincidence with his religious beliefs, except where the State's interest is "compelling"–permitting him, by virtue of his beliefs, "to become a law unto himself,"–contradicts both cons utional tradition and common sense. To adopt a true "compelling interest" requirement for laws that affect religious practice would lead towards anarchy.
You tell me I need a diaper change in the middle of a running down your leg from fear post
I'm not sure what your copy pasta has to do with anything.
Just make sure that when you kick the Quran out that you boot the bible too
Your question is a have you stopped beating up your wife fallacy. Like most of your questions usually are.
Jeez where did you come up with this lousy conclusion.
You're just too stupid to discuss anything with. Seriously. Sorry.
Tells me all I need to know. You're a ing idiot who has no idea what he's talking about. FuthyLumpinkths-esque.
I think it's a bad idea, you obviously disagree with me. So do you think it's a good idea, or do you just have no idea how you think of it? RandomGuy thought it was a good idea and laid out why. Stop cowering behind fallacy claims.
exactly how I'd pronounce it lol I'm not the only one
Credit bene for it
Lol ok
France church attack: Muslims attend Mass
Muslims across France have attended Catholic Mass in a gesture of solidarity after the murder of a priest on Tuesday.
Fr Jacques Hamel was killed in his church in Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray near Rouen by two men who had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group.
France's Muslim council, the CFCM, urged Muslims to show "solidarity and compassion" over the murder.
"We are all Catholics of France," said Anouar Kbibech, the head of the CFCM.
Services were held in Rouen as well as in Paris' Notre Dame Cathedral.
"We're very touched," the Archbishop of Rouen, Dominique Lebrun, told BFMTV.
"It's an important gesture of fraternity. They've told us, and I think they're sincere, that it's not Islam which killed Jacques Hamel."
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36936658
Muslims dont scare me (a lot of people dont seem to realize Muslim men are indistinguishable from non Muslims of the same ethnicity), but a lot of conservative Muslim beliefs are an hetical to western society, particularly when it comes to women.
I feel like that is where the conversation needs to be - how do we encourage more assimilation into society and acceptance of American rights without inadvertently scattering the seeds for yet more radical extremism, at home and abroad?
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/03/woman...ssibility.html
religion of peace?
If only the UK had open carry and unlimited access to guns, this knifer would probably have been taken down before his rampage and nobody would be dead.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
