Reply With Quote
Where are you hearing boos? If there are any, they are getting drown out.
The ones who stayed that are booing...is that code for we're still voting for Hillary?
False.
The place has been pretty packed. What channel have you been watching? Foxnews?
Not all of his delegates walked out. Just a handful..about a 100......of his nearly 2000.
Keep trying.
Where are you hearing boos? If there are any, they are getting drown out.
They are getting drowned out by the lock her up chantsWhere are you hearing boos? If there are any, they are getting drown out.
LOL when things dont line up, make up .They are getting drowned out by the lock her up chants
Getting drown out by the music they blasted trying to cover up the boos and roll call vote chants on the floorWhere are you hearing boos? If there are any, they are getting drown out.
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2016/...1891469653716/
They even cancelled Kaine's supporters nominating speech due to fear of booing
Wow you are such a stupid person.Getting drown out by the music they blasted trying to cover up the boos and roll call vote chants on the floor
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2016/...1891469653716/
They even cancelled Kaine's supporters nominating speech due to fear of booing
Both Hillary and Kaine's nomination were done by acclamation.
Despite rumblings of pro-Bernie delegates trying to derail Kaine's nomination, no one else garnered the 300 signatures necessary to have their name placed into nomination.
If you cant stomach the whole 2 minute clip, just tune to the last 20 seconds.
Clinton was also nominated by acclamation -- a voice vote from the convention floor instead of traditional balloting -- yesterday by her formal rival Sen. Bernie Sanders, but it came after a full roll call vote and the roll call tally will still be recorded in the official record.
You obviously didn't read the linked article. Maybe read it, and the try and delete your post before any sees it.Wow you are such a stupid person.
Both Hillary and Kaine's nomination were done by acclamation.
If you cant stomach the whole 2 minute clip, just tune to the last 20 seconds.
You didn't adressed anything that I posted that refuted your ty claim. Instead you moved the goal post, as you always do. el oh el
You created a claim for me out of thin air dip . I never once mentioned Hillary or Kaine's nomination.
Here you go again, and here is what I claimed, all supported by the article. Read it or continue looking foolish.
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2016/...1891469653716/
They even cancelled Kaine's supporters nominating speech due to fear of booing
Well, eventually we're going to get to "Obarry rigged the general election" and "voter fraud!"... probably around November, tbh
Tim Kaine POTUS after the impeachment? talk about being in the right place at the right time.
I'm still shaking my head that it will be Carlos Dangers "insurance policy" of Huma's emails on his laptop that takes Hillary down.
OMG did he really name the folder "Insurance Policy"?????
this not even the best Hollywood script writers woulda thunk it
and his name is Anthony Weiner
OMG what the world are we in
this is crazy
If there is a Repug impeachment of Hillary, it'll end up like the impeachment of Bill.
Impeaching Hillary would be nothing but more evidence that Repugs don't GIVE A about governing, only all politics all the time.
Hillary will only be impeached if the evidence proves to be so egregious that Democrats agree she is an embarrassment and has to go.
If Huma was in fact the intermediary in pay to play and Carlos Danger had the corroborating emails on his laptop as "insurance" that could very well happen. The claim that Carlos Danger downloaded the emails without Huma's knowledge could very well be true and could predate the bleaching of the server.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_brigades
The web brigades (Russian: Веб-бригады), also known in English media as the troll army, are state-sponsored anonymous Internet political commentators and trolls linked to Russian government. They are suspected to be organized teams and groups of commentators that participate in Russian and international political blogs and Internet forums using sockpuppets and large-scale orchestrated trolling and disinformation campaigns to promote pro-Putin and pro-Russian propaganda.[1][2][3][4] It has also been found that Wikipedia articles were targeted by Russian internet propaganda activities.[5][6][7]
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...an-troll-house
Just after 9pm each day, a long line of workers files out of 55 Savushkina Street, a modern four-storey office complex with a small sign outside that reads “Business centre”. Having spent 12 hours in the building, the workers are replaced by another large group, who will work through the night.
The nondescript building has been identified as the headquarters of Russia’s “troll army”, where hundreds of paid bloggers work round the clock to flood Russian internet forums, social networks and the comments sections of western publications with remarks praising the president, Vladimir Putin, and raging at the depravity and injustice of the west.
Analysis From Britain to Beijing: how governments manipulate the internet
The Kremlin’s ‘cyber army’ is gaining increasing notoriety, but similar tactics are used to influence opinion around the world
Read more
The Guardian spoke to two former employees of the troll enterprise, one of whom was in a department running fake blogs on the social network LiveJournal, and one who was part of a team that spammed municipal chat forums around Russia with pro-Kremlin posts. Both said they were employed unofficially and paid cash-in-hand.
Effort to Expose Russia’s ‘Troll Army’ Draws Vicious Retaliation
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/31/wo...olls.html?_r=0HELSINKI, Finland — Seeking to shine some light into the dark world of Internet trolls, a journalist with Finland’s national broadcaster asked members of her audience to share their experience of encounters with Russia’s “troll army,” a raucous and often venomous force of online agitators.
The response was overwhelming, though not in the direction that the journalist, Jessikka Aro, had hoped.
As she expected, she received some feedback from people who had clashed with aggressively pro-Russian voices online. But she was taken aback, and shaken, by a vicious retaliatory campaign of harassment and insults against her and her work by those same pro-Russian voices.
“Everything in my life went to thanks to the trolls,” said Ms. Aro, a 35-year-old investigative reporter with the social media division of Finland’s state broadcaster, Yle Kioski.
Continue reading the main story
Advertisement
Continue reading the main story
Abusive online harassment is hardly limited to pro-Russian Internet trolls. Ukraine and other countries at odds with the Kremlin also have legions of aggressive avengers on social media.
But pro-Russian voices have become such a noisy and disruptive presence that both NATO and the European Union have set up special units to combat what they see as a growing threat not only to civil discourse but to the well-being of Europe’s democratic order and even to its security.
If that's your prediction, I'd be inclined to bet against it. Where HRC is concerned your passion has unbalanced you -- you've already been wrong about her doom and demise a number of times.
If she's investigated enough, she becomes guilty even if nobody ever finds any evidence to show her guilty of anything other than perhaps having bad judgment, right?
They'll keep investigating (to the tune of tens/hundreds of millions of tax dollars) because she (and Obama, I'd argue) represent a tangible threat to the political hegemony that many conservatives are failingly trying to preserve.
ler is the choice of most neocon/wall street/corporate media billionaires.
She is political hedgemony in the flesh
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
