More trash teams
They didnt learn from the latest Euro
This official? Fucking groce if true. 40 teams is acceptable, but 48..
The qualifiers is obe of the most exciting football to watch...it fills the void of no world cup for 3 years...
But with 48 teams...what's the fucking point!
The World Cup is perfect as it is. Fucking gold digging bastards. They will end up fucking up their gold mine.
It is not official, it will be discussed Oct 13th and decision should be taken next year.
Project is defended by Infantino who wants like 32 teams directly qualified and more 16 qualified through elimination games or some shit and a WC organized by at least two countries...
more games between NTs ... what's wrong with that tbh? sure these FIFA niggas are trying to maximize the revenue but it'd be actually great to have more teams tbh.
1. We get to see good players with shit countries like penaldo / bale / etc.
2. We might get local rivalries with non elite but decent teams: serbia - croatia, russia-ukraine, nigeria-cameroon, china-japan, germany-austria, uruguay-paraguay.
3. It's going to be tougher to win such a cup because any extra game decreases the chance to win.
4. We can get crazy upsets like icyland vs england so we can talk trash to these faggots even 50 years from now.
5. Imo many quality teams don't make the world cup : e.g. ukraine, serbia, cameroon, denmark, paraguy, scotland,
6. we get to see funny matches like iran-usa saudi arabia-russia south korea - best korea
imo the qualifiers will decide seeding, which is still a big deal, you don't want to get fucked in the ass by a germany-italy-ghana-argentina group for example, and could also decide how much money the federation gets (quite relevant tbh).
Actually this is a good idea, I know that I am in minority on this one but you niggas will warm up to it in time tbh.
Also a longer world cup means less stress at work because nobody gives a fuck during the WC ..
all going down hill.
I could see this being a one-off event like Copa centenario (so it would be held in 2030)..America is probably the only country that can host it alone (a 48-team WC), but they might give a token participation to Canada in that case....
France-Germany/Japan-South Korea, maybe Spain-Portugal are the only logical joint-bid of two countries capable of doing it..Otherwise it is going to take 3 or more countries to cover this shit.meh..
Any of italy/germany/spain/england/france/japan/argentina+chile/japan+south korea/sweden+denmark+norway/ belgium+netherlands are a better fit for such an event. You get to see football, culture, great food, safe streets, friendly atmosphere ... it'd be great. Seriously, why organize a footballing competition in the US? To get the most boring, plain, furthest away form the real fans, over priced competition? no thanks son.
48 teams allowing shit kents like china and those arab countries in cause they cant qualify, and they are the ones with money...
instead of automatic qualification, why not get them to pay for a spot...
Also countries on bad rolls might still make a lower seed: like chile right now, netherlands for the previous euro.
And imo qualifiers are boring anyhow, just a lot of "strategic" games or crazy lopsided conferences/groups.
Y'all niggas fail to see the advantages here, these fagggots are actually doing good with their greed for once
That's almost as much as four of the countries combined..in that big of a population, its a given its going to create a football like atmosphere.
US is one of the most populated countries in the world. Its really the perfect place to host a world cup.
A world cup in argentina with its footballing culture and history and its demented fans would be awesome.
A world cup in germany where everything will go smooth as butter and all the knowledgeable euro fans will be present will be great (2006)
A world cup in england will bring the and meltdowns. Winning in england would be great tbh.
A world cup in italy would be amazing, such a beautiful country and probably the most crazed fans in europe.
A world cup in spain would be a great vacation place in the country where the best football in the world is played.
A world cup in france would a nice cozy, middle-of-europe place with great food, great women, safety, funny meltdowns .. like this euro.
A world cup in belgium/netherlands would be a combination of england and france.
A world cup in scandinavia would be safest, most family friendly world cup in the history of world cups. I'd let my 14 year old cousin to go with his class tbh.
All these places have a deep footballing culture, great cuisine, long traditions, beautiful architecture, safer than the us (us police and drunk wc fans .. um.. yeah), with true fans with a deep football understanding and commitment. Also all these places have really short travel times, so you don't have to always be on the run and because of this you can enjoy your stay. Even brasil (horrible place to organize the world cup tbh, with all the problems they've got right now) got this right because their population is clustered around the sao-paulo-curitiba-belo horizonte-rio-recife-brasilia area, where most of the matches took place.
Even a world cup in russia is better than the us because it's cheap as hell and it will be safe (putin isn't going to screw this up, if you read euro news he is already putting the word that any russians who misbehave will probably see gulag work as a vacation in comparison to what they'll get you don't fuck with the man in russia tbh). Getting drunk russian style is also alluring
Really, do you think the footballing world would organize their centenario in a place so void of football culture and fandom like the us? I understand south america is corrupted as hell but europe won't buy this shit.
China has a pretty decent footballing culture. It's their number one team sport.
The USofGay has the best stadiums, by far.. but the atmosphere will be bad tbh, ESPECIALLY if they expand it to 48 countries and you have muslims traveling here. Them scared white evangelicals might do something retarded, it'll be like Russia-England at the Euros
Not to mention the stadiums will be <20% filled for a majority of the time.
Frankly I would be scared to go to a world cup in the us because I'd probably have to fly all the time between cities thousands of miles apart with a million reservations instead of just chilling and travelling 5 hours every 3-4 days, the police would probably take me for some nazi because I'm tall white and speak with a real german accent and search/strip/rob me, niggas everywhere doing nigga things, mexicans pretending to be eurpean just to rob you, whole crowds of crazy protesters/looters for black lives matters/occupy wall street/women rights/dog rights/trump/elections or whatever other histeria is popular right now and will make ZERO change. Not to mention going to a game and having 3/4 of the spectators some fat 'mericans bandwagoning germany. I just don't see it happening tbh, too much can go wrong. And I'm not turkish, or russian, or muslim, or chinese, or south euros (who can be quite tanned (tanned as in tanned, they are white as fuck without the sun) and easily mistaken for lybians/syrians) .. these dudes will have even more trouble.
Not to mention there is always the probability of some political false flag / war /droning / tensions / hypocrisy/ merican shit which will take the beauty out of the world cup and turn in into some political shit. Sincerely, the us is in no position to organize a world cup, there are many other much better options, OBJECTIVELY.
Imo the centenario should be in spain : great weather, great footballing history, haven't organized a tournament in quite some time, easy to get around for both euros, arabs and latin americans (=99% of real football fans), great stuff to visit, great beaches, the money from the world cup would help their economy. That would be my vote.
Centenario has to be Argentina/Uruguay imhotbhfwiw
I do hope the 100th Years brings the cup to its birthplace and the final is played in that same stadium...
Argentina is a mess..what are you talking about? ...
Both Argentina and Uru and even combined...are way too small and and their Fottball federation is a mess...That world cup is going to be one of the worse...regardless lf historical significance.
It would have to be a 4 nation effort or something if its to be held in South America..and Brazil is not included
I mean Players are legit complaining about not getting FED by AFA..and you want these guys to have any room of collaboration for a world cup event?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)