You backed out last time I called you on believing this bull and played the "this is just a fun conspiracy thread" card, so excuse me for thinking you might just be entertaining yourself here.
If you actually think there's a pedophile ring happening, what are you doing about it, patriot? What's the FBI going to do about it, and why haven't they done anything yet?
Please share the names of these real journalists and what they uncovered and when. I'd be more than happy to cross reference what they uncovered and reported and when it was actually uncovered by Reddit/4chan users. You'd be surprised that the overwhelming majority of what your real journalists reported on was almost entirely pulled from the exact places you despise.
My thoughts on this have changed with as new information was found, I certainly can't just dismiss it like you because the New York Times said nothing is going on. Setting aside all the pizza stuff there are too many direct proven connections that just don't sit right with me:
Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein
Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsby (human trafficking)
Laura Silsby and her lawyer Jorge Torres-Puello (human trafficking)
Jorge Torres-Puello's wife (sexual exploitation of minors and women)
John Podesta and Denny Hastert
These connections are real. Whether or not the mean anything is up for debate, but to just brush them off like you are doing seems shortsighted and foolish.
A couple more degrees of separation and you will find yourself right there in the middle of all that Italian food I tell ya.
And we just don't set aside all the pizza stuff...
A friend of mine makes pizza from scratch for the whole family on Friday nights and calls it " Pizza Night In America" . Chills are now traveling in waves up and down my spine.
Bats, Bats all over me.
Reddit and 4chan pulled from the same primary source as journalists: Wikileaks. The former just didn't know the difference between fluff and news.
Journalists weren't sourcing from 4chan posts about Wikileaks.
Last edited by Spurminator; 11-27-2016 at 10:33 PM.
I will take my chances seeing as no one with any journalistic merit or investigative authority is touching this.
Happy sleuthing! Enjoy your wormhole of shame. We'll continue to laugh at you.
i need more pictures of the big medic dude following clinton around with the su ious pen imo
So now that poor Assange abandoned TSA he's resorting to recycled conspiracies from reddit and 4chan.
This ing guy. lmao
Name the real journalists you are talking about and link their articles. I don't recall a single real journalist claiming to have personally dug through the thousands and thousands of do ents and uncover something before it was already out on Reddit/4chan/twitter/anonymous. Journalists just sifted through what was already found and picked and chooses what to report on.
And which journalists or publications are you speaking of? Be specific.
was he eating pizza?....
Man, you have been spending a LOT of time on r/The_Donald, you're even picking up their inflated sense of self worth. (But kudos for at least still coming to a place like this where dissenters aren't banned.)
Journalists didn't necessarily have to sift through all of the emails. Wikileaks has a Twitter account that highlighted some of the more damning emails, and the site itself has search functionality on the database. You're exhibiting the same disconnection from reality that led people to question how the FBI could read all of the Weiner emails in a week.
Snap out of it, dude. It's sad to see otherwise smart dogs get so caught up in being wagged.
I've said this in another thread, but a good starting point for determining if a publication may qualify as trustworthy is to see if they've ever published a retraction on an incorrect story.
I seem to remember Wikileaks sending a tweet out with the link to the new do ent dump. All the 4chan/Redditors would dig through and tweet back what they found to Wikileaks, then Wikileaks would verify and then tweet out. Been a while since I followed the Wikileaks dumps but I remember them happening differently, I could be wrong.
Man, you have been spending a LOT of time on r/The_Donald, you're even picking up their inflated sense of self worth. (But kudos for at least still coming to a place like this where dissenters aren't banned.)
Journalists didn't necessarily have to sift through all of the emails. Wikileaks has a Twitter account that highlighted some of the more damning emails, and the site itself has search functionality on the database. You're exhibiting the same disconnection from reality that led people to question how the FBI could read all of the Weiner emails in a week.
Like I said earlier there are just too many coincidences for me to look the other way now, and I don't have any social media so I'm not hurting anyone by posting things here. I'm not doxxing anyone or posting on their facebook/instagram/twitter pages and threatening them.
Dismissing all of this as "fake news" is lazy, and the timing of the media prepping everyone for "fake news" is pretty convenient.
Do you deny the following connections or are these connections fake news?
Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein
Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsby (human trafficking)
Laura Silsby and her lawyer Jorge Torres-Puello (human trafficking)
Jorge Torres-Puello's wife (sexual exploitation of minors and women)
John Podesta and Denny Hastert
Are the claims against John Podesta just a massive troll job by Andrew Breitbart still running 6 years and counting?
At what point do you say there is a lot of smoke? I'm already there.
Is this also a fake news site that was in on the massive troll job starting three years ago or just another random coincidence?
Madeleine McCann case: British police release sketches of person of interest
http://www.ctvnews.ca/world/madelein...rest-1.1496650
Andrew knew something about Podesta.
Don't claim fake news and run away.
Originally Posted by spurraider21
fake news strikes again and TSA is all over it
Do you deny the connection between Marina Abromovich and the Podestas?
Do you deny Marina Abromovich's "spirit cooking" is a bunch a satan worshipping weirdness?
Do you deny that John Podesta directly referenced it?
Do you deny that "cheese pizza" has an established connection to, at the very least, child pornography?
Do you deny that a pizza shop owner is identified as one of the 50 most powerful people in Washington DC?
Do you deny said pizza shop owner is connected to david brock as a lover and hillary clinton as a direct supporter?
Do you deny said pizza shop has some ED UP going on while, at the same time, incessantly talking about how "family friendly" it is and how events starting at 10 PM are "open to all ages" (every ing poster they put up says "open to all ages", who the does that for a pizza shop?
Do you deny said pizza shop owner has some really sick on his twitter and insta-gram that he suddenly made private?
Do you deny Andrew Brietbart called out Podesta as a pedophile in 2011?
Do you deny the continued relationship of Jeffrey Epstein with the highest levels of government in the US even after his ridiculously light sentence for running a child pornography ring?
i think to be as specific as i can be, you've gone off the deep end
i dont think theres anything to substantiate or corroborate the claims that this pizza shop is the centerpiece of a child porn ring involving hillary clinton
lol some bizarre, probably ed in the head artist sends john podestas brother an email and therefore hillary clinton is satanic
for somebody obsessed with extreme vetting, i'd think you'd understand that a good journalist would corroborate and "vet" their story before printing it. instead you choose to skip all that, find any story printed anywhere and say "nuh uh you cant prove it wrong." you'd make a great religious zealot
Last edited by spurraider21; 11-28-2016 at 10:12 PM.
So now you're suggesting the media is complicit in this cover-up and we're being conditioned to mistrust the news in case this story gets legs.
Pretty sure 9-11 Truthers and Moon-Landing Deniers made similar claims. I would think we're well conditioned at this point.
Maybe the media was creating all of the fake news from the beginning as a sort of Fake News False Flag or a smokescreen.
Good journalists have answered every single one of these questions and put them in print. Take each question by itself. Try answering more than zero this time.
For a person who's said they're over entertaining this thread you sure do reply a lot. I've presented quite a few more interesting things to talk about than said quote. If you're going to continue on at least respond to those and make this interesting.So now you're suggesting the media is complicit in this cover-up and we're being conditioned to mistrust the news in case this story gets legs.
Pretty sure 9-11 Truthers and Moon-Landing Deniers made similar claims. I would think we're well conditioned at this point.
Maybe the media was creating all of the fake news from the beginning as a sort of Fake News False Flag or a smokescreen.
You'd be long gone if more didn't keep popping up, I would be too. But youre curious just like me.
i'm not an investigative journalist, it's not my job to find the answers to these questions. i haven't seen any credible evidence or corroboration to give any affirmative answers
Case and point, TSA.
Go find a rope.
You are either lying or willfully ignorant. They've all been answered in threads you've participated in. You done playing coy?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
