If you put 100 to my 400. The difference is 100 dollars that I could possibly win.
I meant $425 being the payouts paid in full before the deadline to make sure the winner gets their money. Not 400 to win 100. It's 100 to win 25 and 100 to win 400 ( 425 paid out).
If you put 100 to my 400. The difference is 100 dollars that I could possibly win.
I don't mind paying 1 week before the deadline.
The bet is 4 to 1.
+400 = my bet. My 100 wins ($400 from you)
- 400 = your bet. Your 100 wins ($25 from me)
Do you think I'm that dumb?
So 2 options,
1. I win 25 bucks.
2. If I lose, I pay you 400.
Are you a ing dumbass?
That's what 4 to 1 is. You're betting -400 that LA won't be traded at the deadline, which is very fair considering how hard it is for a trade to happen.
No, we're betting 4 to 1. I put in 100 and you put in 25.
Are you suggesting I put 400 bucks on the line for 25? That makes no ing sense.
Okay okay, have it your way. Your 400 to my 100. Paid a week before the deadline.
If you win, you get 100 from me.
If I win, I get 400 from you.
Again, I said I can put in 200 or 100. I guess 200 since you want it that way. I'm good one week before deadline.
My 200 to your 800?
I'm good with that too.
You keep changing words. I'm actually getting sick of debating, but I'm gonna say it again since you seem to be a got.
I'm putting in 200. You are putting in 50. It's not so hard. If you fail to agree next post, I'm just gonna call you a little .
Deal. I'll ignore the garbage you typically post. Your 200 to my 50.
That's not how a 4 to 1 bet works, buddy.
Atleast he tried.
I'll put up $400 if you want to lose an additional $100 (not $25 lol), Manu4Tres.
He was willing to go 800. He should agree with you easily.
Why are you guys betting so much? It sounds like Manu4Tres has the better deal. He's the guy saying LA wants out and if he's not correct, as in bull ting, you guys are going to lose out.
You do realize that Spurs aren't just going to trade LA to trade him. Trades are hard to come by. If anything, they are getting a better deal because Spurs are very disciplined with trades and teams are becoming smarter/more disciplined as well.
Agree. Also, how they will lure another big-name FA in the next seasons when they couldn't keep LMA on the team...
The Spurs want that the big dogs to sacrifice their stats, their ALL-STAR appearances and then...they would trade those players? This would set bad precedent.
That's why this is not on LMA but Pop. A coach already said the player is getting 'in shape'...And he's the one with the rest? I know, he'll be there tomorrow but should have been working in the two days not just one.
Old Pau was in the practice with Tim but not LMA...? Weird.
Aldridge has been "getting in shape" the past couple seasons. I once sat out from an injury for 6 ign months and returned to action and got back "in shape" within 2 weeks. And I was in my mid 30s. What's Aldridge's excuse while having access to the best trainers money can buy?
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!
Lamarcus not practicing... after a blowout game against the Nets in which he played maybe 22 minutes of really easy basketball and has had 3 days of "rest."
Pau seen in practice with Tim.
This is Lamarcus calling in sick basically.
The plot thickens.
Have we ever heard of healthy 31 year old stars getting rested for practices???
Unless Pop really wanted to test out Davis Bertans... I mean I can't believe he's getting excused from practices like this.
I doubt he is 100% healthy if he is "resting" after two days off. We all know Pop likes to stretch out minutes, but he doesn't give guys days off just for the heck of it, especially ones he has recently called out for not being in shape. To me, this reeks of LMA dealing with a nagging injury that isn't enough to keep him out of games.
Why the is LMA resting? They played 3 days ago....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)