Pay Patty in the Off-season

[dabom]

It's not word games, its what I said. Feel free to go back and look. I'm not wrong on this. I know what was said to me and I know what I said.

You bet me. You believed it. Why else take it?

[MaNu4Tres]

You bet me. You believed it. Why else take it?

Lol its 50 dollars.

[dabom]

Lol its 50 dollars.

It is. But i don't take all bets just cause they are $50.

[DPG21920]

The point about Patty is he's not a starting PG. If you think the G rotation this year is the downfall, you have to really consider paying Mills a lot of money because that means the same problem exists next year only more expensive now.

Mills should be kept under many scenarios but others should definitley be explored and if SA can get another shooter (Mills role) and actually get a better true back up PG (both attacking and defensively - hopefully Murray) they can be better off.

[BillMc]

I'd pay him 14mil a year. Easy.

I wonder if for that money you could get Hill out of Utah? Of course, we've got Patty's bird rights, so far easier to re-sign Mills.

[MaNu4Tres]

It is. But i don't take all bets just cause they are $50.

I don't take all bets either, but it was honestly a fun, 50 dollar bet. Nothing more.

[dabom]

The point about Patty is he's not a starting PG. If you think the G rotation this year is the downfall, you have to really consider paying Mills a lot of money because that means the same problem exists next year only more expensive now.

Mills should be kept under many scenarios but others should definitley be explored and if SA can get another shooter (Mills role) and actually get a better true back up PG (both attacking and defensively - hopefully Murray) they can be better off.

You act like Patty is the problem for 's sake.

[dabom]

I don't take all bets either, but it was honestly a fun, 50 dollar bet. Nothing more.

I'm just gonna leave it there.

[BillMc]

The point about Patty is he's not a starting PG. If you think the G rotation this year is the downfall, you have to really consider paying Mills a lot of money because that means the same problem exists next year only more expensive now.

Mills should be kept under many scenarios but others should definitley be explored and if SA can get another shooter (Mills role) and actually get a better true back up PG (both attacking and defensively - hopefully Murray) they can be better off.

Can we realistically get Hill and push Tony to the bench?

[DPG21920]

You act like Patty is the problem for 's sake.

I think he's a problem in the context of the Spurs needs, yes. He plays really bad defense (he tries, he's just small and not good) and he's not a good PG in terms of running an offense, passing & getting into the lane.

He's really good in his role but the point is addressing the need (a PG to surpass TP) and how the Spurs can get there.

[dabom]

I think he's a problem in the context of the Spurs needs, yes. He plays really bad defense (he tries, he's just small and not good) and he's not a good PG in terms of running an offense, passing & getting into the lane.

He's really good in his role but the point is addressing the need (a PG to surpass TP) and how the Spurs can get there.

This is why you are a stupid .

I'm a Spurs fan through and through but don't tell me Patty is the problem. Watch the ing games got.

[DPG21920]

Can we realistically get Hill and push Tony to the bench?

Not sure - too many unknown variables right now: Salary Cap Number (although this seems like the least of the unknowns), how UTA does this year and the room they have to re-sign Hill, Does Pau opt-in or out, What is the market for Mills, how does this team do in the playoffs, how does TP look, Murray, etc...

Just too many.

With regards to Hill and SA there is an obvious need and connection and some pathways to that, but it's not a slam dunk by any stretch.

[DPG21920]

This is why you are a stupid .

I'm a Spurs fan through and through but don't tell me Patty is the problem. Watch the ing games got.

You're missing the point. I'm not saying Patty is "the problem". I'm using context. You're either being obtuse or I am sorely over-estimating your intellect.

[dabom]

You're missing the point. I'm not saying Patty is "the problem". I'm using context. You're either being obtuse or I am sorely over-estimating your intellect.

You just said he is you stupid .

[DPG21920]

You just said he is you stupid .

Read it again.

[dabom]

I think he's a problem in the context of the Spurs needs, yes. He plays really bad defense (he tries, he's just small and not good) and he's not a good PG in terms of running an offense, passing & getting into the lane.

He's really good in his role but the point is addressing the need (a PG to surpass TP) and how the Spurs can get there.

Doesn't matter if you said "in the context of the Spurs needs". You are starting that with "he's a problem".

got.

[vander]

he's definitely not worth more than Green, 4/36 max IMO

[DPG21920]

Doesn't matter if you said "in the context of the Spurs needs". You are starting that with "he's a problem".

got.

Saying he's a problem in the context of our discussion is wildly different that saying he's the problem. But you know that.

He's a problem because TP is under contact so he's staying and if the PG spot needs to be upgraded Mills is a problem because of the money he will command and his skillsets.

He is great for SA but he is not the answer to the PG spot for SA and he is a FA so the Spurs have to deal with that.

Stop being an idiot for like 5 minutes please.

[dabom]

Saying he's a problem in the context of our discussion is wildly different that saying he's the problem. But you know that.

He's a problem because TP is under contact so he's staying and if the PG spot needs to be upgraded Mills is a problem because of the money he will command and his skillsets.

He is great for SA but he is not the answer to the PG spot for SA and he is a FA so the Spurs have to deal with that.

Stop being an idiot for like 5 minutes please.

Stop trying to sugar coat it. It no way in any context is he the ing problem stupid .

[BillMc]

I do wonder how Patty would perform with the bench post-Manu. Having a 2 guard who can run the offense like a point to a large degree maximizes Patty's considerable strengths and minimizes his weaknesses.

[DPG21920]

Stop trying to sugar coat it. It no way in any context is he the ing problem stupid .

You continue to be an idiot unfortunatley. Turn the corner.

[dabom]

You continue to be an idiot unfortunatley. Turn the corner.

You're the one that said it you stupid .

[DPG21920]

You're the one that said it you stupid .

Read it again.

[dabom]

Read it again.

I understand English better than you. You need to go back and understand what you wrote, got.

[DPG21920]

I understand English better than you. You need to go back and understand what you wrote, got.

Nah - it's pretty clear to everyone you do not. You can feel free to disagree with my logic/assessment there, but you aren't doing that. You are completely ignoring very basic comprehension so that you can post emoji's like a teenage girl.