Reply With Quote
Bayless and Dellevadova got 9 or 10 million/year IIRC..Patty's getting much more than that IMO
He's worth 10m a year
EASY, in today's market.
Bayless and Dellevadova got 9 or 10 million/year IIRC..Patty's getting much more than that IMO
Mills is probably getting 50/55 in 4...
Also, dude should win sixth man of the year.
For as great as he's been, it will be a mistake buying at his apex and paying him 14-15 mil per. If Spurs can get him on a home town discount, great, but I don't see it.
He's getting paid and will get offered a starting job in Philly, Dallas, or Chicago ( Bulls will let Rondo walk).
If he keeps it up then he's most likely getting the Jamal "6th Man" Crawford deal of 12mill/per.Bayless and Dellevadova got 9 or 10 million/year IIRC..Patty's getting much more than that IMO
Wouldn't be surprised if he gets a starting job and serious $, tbh..Sacramento, Dallas, Chicago, etc will need a starter at the 1..
If the Kings somehow make it in as the 8th seed then they are going to sign Patty as the missing piece.
He's worth 55m in 4,
if that's what it takes...
He would be perfect with the Bulls next to Butler and Wade IMO..they desperately need shooting, too..If the Kings somehow make it in as the 8th seed then they are going to sign Patty as the missing piece.
I hope not.
The last thing the Spurs need is the Bulls
poaching our ing veteran talent.
We ain't that DEEP.
The Bulls usually love midget point-guards so they might pay him.
Only worry about Mills is that with his "energy" playstyle..A 4 year contract might get you two years of great mills and at 32-33, an average player getting paid 14per
Patty Mills’ market value works out to be roughly $18.6 million per season.
http://sportsagentblog.com/2016/12/1...next-contract/
True.
But still worth it for the Spurs.
Would rather use that money towards a strong offer for Jrue Holiday.
Spurs aren't going to be able to afford Mills unless he takes a discount. Thanks Porker...
Of course they will be able to afford keeping him. Whether they'd think paying him $50-55/4 would be worth it is another matter.
He's going to get $16mil/season minimum in today's market. Spurs would have to let Simmons/Dedmon/Lee bounce to keep him. Not sure they'd be willing to lose three rotation players for Mills.
Nope. They have bird rights and Patty's cap hold is small.
Derp, forgot about bird rights.
I have strongly been inclined to think Spurs pay to keep him. Manu is retiring and Tony is done. Murray will require seasoning and development...
Only his statement about wanting to be a starter in the league and offers of commensurate pay to a starting job from another team will pry him away, but I suspect he will get such offers... so it's very uncertain.
The problem with Patty is the market demands he be paid well (and more power to him) but if you sign him for a lot of cash, you still need to find another playmaking point guard or pray Tony hangs on or Murray develops very quickly.
I'd hate to lose Patty. I'd also hate to eat up huge amounts of cap on him. It's a conundrum for PATFO.
I suspect, though, he is gone.
Last edited by BillMc; 12-24-2016 at 12:32 PM.
Porker's running him offPERIOD
Perfect analysis - unfortunately.Dijon, however, did provide a very small ray of hope last night against the Blazers. He wasn't a TO machine. He even hit a 3. He was much better than I expected, even though he did not show much propensity for creating for others. So, I am not convinced he is really suited to be a PG. At this early stage Dijon seems like more of a combo guard to me.
Man, is there anybody ST thinks deserves to get paid? Always wanting 'hometown discounts'. As if MVPaddy hasn't been ridiculously underpaid the past three years. I even remember people talking about Kawhi getting the max extension.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
