Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 115
  1. #1
    Klaw apalisoc_9's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    24,488
    Probably the most entertaining mini tournament in the NBA and it's actually compe ive. I'm really hoping they increase the contestant Needs to be a longer shootout. Who would you invite?

    Red -Curry-Thompson-Harden-Irving are all going to join for sure.

    Leaves 7 mpre spot.

    Eric Gordon-Kyle Lowry-Kevin Durant-Love-Danny Green-Mcculom-Beal...

  2. #2
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    100,173
    Mark Price would destroy those clowns tbh

  3. #3
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    17,061
    One question though, if 3 pt shooting is so much better in today's NBA, why aren't the players shooting that much better in the 3 pt shootout?

    I mean, you are taking the variable of defense out as these are just players wide open shooting against time, and yet:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-Point_Contest

    Klay Thompson 27 / 34[c] 2016
    Stephen Curry 27 / 34[c] 2015
    Craig Hodges 25 / 30 1986
    Jason Kapono 25 / 30 2008
    Craig Hodges 24 / 30 1991
    Mark Price 24 / 30 1994
    Hubert Davis 24 / 30 1998
    Jason Kapono 24 / 30 2007
    Marco Belinelli 24[b] / 34[c] 2014
    Klay Thompson 24 / 34[c] 2015
    Stephen Curry 23 / 34[c] 2016

    And the points are just higher because there are 4 extra money balls. Percentage-wise, the highest percentages were:

    1986, 2008, 1991, 1994, 1998, 2007, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2015, 2016.

    All the ones in the 10s made it purely because of the extra money balls.

    Shouldn't they be shooting 80%+ like scrubs in the 90s (Hodges) and 00s (Kapono)?

  4. #4
    Saytowns Fawtbox King lebomb's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    10,522
    Mark Price would destroy those clowns tbh
    Craig Hodges would destroy Mark.

  5. #5
    Veteran Fabbs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    15,566
    And the points are just higher because there are 4 extra money balls. Percentage-wise, the highest percentages were:

    1986, 2008, 1991, 1994, 1998, 2007, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2015, 2016.

    All the ones in the 10s made it purely because of the extra money balls.

    Shouldn't they be shooting 80%+ like scrubs in the 90s (Hodges) and 00s (Kapono)?
    Rack it.

  6. #6
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    100,173
    One question though, if 3 pt shooting is so much better in today's NBA, why aren't the players shooting that much better in the 3 pt shootout?

    I mean, you are taking the variable of defense out as these are just players wide open shooting against time, and yet:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-Point_Contest

    Klay Thompson 27 / 34[c] 2016
    Stephen Curry 27 / 34[c] 2015
    Craig Hodges 25 / 30 1986
    Jason Kapono 25 / 30 2008
    Craig Hodges 24 / 30 1991
    Mark Price 24 / 30 1994
    Hubert Davis 24 / 30 1998
    Jason Kapono 24 / 30 2007
    Marco Belinelli 24[b] / 34[c] 2014
    Klay Thompson 24 / 34[c] 2015
    Stephen Curry 23 / 34[c] 2016

    And the points are just higher because there are 4 extra money balls. Percentage-wise, the highest percentages were:

    1986, 2008, 1991, 1994, 1998, 2007, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2015, 2016.

    All the ones in the 10s made it purely because of the extra money balls.


    Shouldn't they be shooting 80%+ like scrubs in the 90s (Hodges) and 00s (Kapono)?

  7. #7
    Veteran Killakobe81's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    36,553
    One question though, if 3 pt shooting is so much better in today's NBA, why aren't the players shooting that much better in the 3 pt shootout?

    I mean, you are taking the variable of defense out as these are just players wide open shooting against time, and yet:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-Point_Contest

    Klay Thompson 27 / 34[c] 2016
    Stephen Curry 27 / 34[c] 2015
    Craig Hodges 25 / 30 1986
    Jason Kapono 25 / 30 2008
    Craig Hodges 24 / 30 1991
    Mark Price 24 / 30 1994
    Hubert Davis 24 / 30 1998
    Jason Kapono 24 / 30 2007
    Marco Belinelli 24[b] / 34[c] 2014
    Klay Thompson 24 / 34[c] 2015
    Stephen Curry 23 / 34[c] 2016

    And the points are just higher because there are 4 extra money balls. Percentage-wise, the highest percentages were:

    1986, 2008, 1991, 1994, 1998, 2007, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2015, 2016.

    All the ones in the 10s made it purely because of the extra money balls.

    Shouldn't they be shooting 80%+ like scrubs in the 90s (Hodges) and 00s (Kapono)?
    Amb with hard to dispute goods nothing but crickets in here

  8. #8
    Take the fcking keys away baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    93,471
    Who would you invite?
    Probably Larry Bird

  9. #9
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    41,654
    Are Steph and Klay even above 40% this season?

  10. #10
    Winner in a losers circle 140's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    6,838
    I really don't have a dog in this fight but it looks like today's NBA crew just took another loss ITT tbh

  11. #11
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    3,755
    Yes, let's judge based on the 3pt contest and not the numbers from the actual games. Makes sense.

  12. #12
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    17,061
    Yes, let's judge based on the 3pt contest and not the numbers from the actual games. Makes sense.
    Because actual game play have variables like defense. For all we know, lax perimeter defense due to rule changes led to this e in three point shooting, not to mention the total lack of interior defense forces perimeter defense to sag, leading to more open perimeter shots

  13. #13
    Board Man Comes Home Clipper Nation's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Clippers
    Post Count
    54,257
    One question though, if 3 pt shooting is so much better in today's NBA, why aren't the players shooting that much better in the 3 pt shootout?
    If three-point shooting was better in yesterday's NBA, why did they have to shorten the three-point line in the actual games?

  14. #14
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    3,755
    Because actual game play have variables like defense. For all we know, lax perimeter defense due to rule changes led to this e in three point shooting, not to mention the total lack of interior defense forces perimeter defense to sag, leading to more open perimeter shots
    Dude. They don't play defense at all in the 3pt contest. The players are on a break. And being the only one on the floor shooting is different anyway. To even compare the two is pretty laughable.

  15. #15
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    100,173
    If three-point shooting was better in yesterday's NBA, why did they have to shorten the three-point line in the actual games?
    To inflate the stats of 1 man


    DK

  16. #16
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    44,916
    One question though, if 3 pt shooting is so much better in today's NBA, why aren't the players shooting that much better in the 3 pt shootout?

    I mean, you are taking the variable of defense out as these are just players wide open shooting against time, and yet:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-Point_Contest

    Klay Thompson 27 / 34[c] 2016
    Stephen Curry 27 / 34[c] 2015
    Craig Hodges 25 / 30 1986
    Jason Kapono 25 / 30 2008
    Craig Hodges 24 / 30 1991
    Mark Price 24 / 30 1994
    Hubert Davis 24 / 30 1998
    Jason Kapono 24 / 30 2007
    Marco Belinelli 24[b] / 34[c] 2014
    Klay Thompson 24 / 34[c] 2015
    Stephen Curry 23 / 34[c] 2016

    And the points are just higher because there are 4 extra money balls. Percentage-wise, the highest percentages were:

    1986, 2008, 1991, 1994, 1998, 2007, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2015, 2016.

    All the ones in the 10s made it purely because of the extra money balls.

    Shouldn't they be shooting 80%+ like scrubs in the 90s (Hodges) and 00s (Kapono)?
    Easy, in the 3pt contest the sample size is very small. Nobody said the best yesterday's NBA three point shooters aren't as good as the best three point shooters of today, just that the guys capable of hitting threes in today's NBA is a lot more significant.

    Besides, lol NBA 3pt contest, what counts are the actual games, tbh.

  17. #17
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    100,173
    Well in actual games , shooters weren't as wide open open as they are today

    Price and Miller hit some tough 3 pointers back in the day, imagine in todays NBA if they were wide open

    (But yeah Curry can hit difficult shots as well)

  18. #18
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    44,916
    Well in actual games , shooters weren't as wide open open as they are today

    Price and Miller hit some tough 3 pointers back in the day, imagine in todays NBA if they were wide open

    (But yeah Curry can hit difficult shots as well)
    The ? Everybody packed the paint and conceded the 3 back then.

  19. #19
    R.C. Drunkford TimDunkem's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    13,927
    The ? Everybody packed the paint and conceded the 3 back then.
    He needs to stick to trolling.

  20. #20
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    100,173
    The ? Everybody packed the paint and conceded the 3 back then.
    Uh no there was that thing called illegal defense

  21. #21
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    90,829
    One question though, if 3 pt shooting is so much better in today's NBA, why aren't the players shooting that much better in the 3 pt shootout?

    I mean, you are taking the variable of defense out as these are just players wide open shooting against time, and yet:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-Point_Contest

    Klay Thompson 27 / 34[c] 2016
    Stephen Curry 27 / 34[c] 2015
    Craig Hodges 25 / 30 1986
    Jason Kapono 25 / 30 2008
    Craig Hodges 24 / 30 1991
    Mark Price 24 / 30 1994
    Hubert Davis 24 / 30 1998
    Jason Kapono 24 / 30 2007
    Marco Belinelli 24[b] / 34[c] 2014
    Klay Thompson 24 / 34[c] 2015
    Stephen Curry 23 / 34[c] 2016

    And the points are just higher because there are 4 extra money balls. Percentage-wise, the highest percentages were:

    1986, 2008, 1991, 1994, 1998, 2007, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2015, 2016.

    All the ones in the 10s made it purely because of the extra money balls.

    Shouldn't they be shooting 80%+ like scrubs in the 90s (Hodges) and 00s (Kapono)?
    Only if you don't understand how basketball works. , we could shoot a decent percentage from 12 feet but not in an NBA game.

    You don't get a rack of balls during the game (though you might get your balls racked) so you have to be on right away. Once you're dialed in, even many non NBA players could hit the 3 at a high clip, they just can't dribble, pass or defend.

  22. #22
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    96,400
    needing to add a full rack of moneyballs in the 3pt contest

  23. #23
    Winner in a losers circle 140's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    6,838
    needing to add a full rack of moneyballs in the 3pt contest

  24. #24
    EAT IT!!! Kawhitstorm's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Post Count
    17,769
    Mark Price would destroy those clowns tbh

  25. #25
    Veteran Arcadian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    9,282
    One question though, if 3 pt shooting is so much better in today's NBA, why aren't the players shooting that much better in the 3 pt shootout?

    I mean, you are taking the variable of defense out as these are just players wide open shooting against time, and yet:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-Point_Contest

    Klay Thompson 27 / 34[c] 2016
    Stephen Curry 27 / 34[c] 2015
    Craig Hodges 25 / 30 1986
    Jason Kapono 25 / 30 2008
    Craig Hodges 24 / 30 1991
    Mark Price 24 / 30 1994
    Hubert Davis 24 / 30 1998
    Jason Kapono 24 / 30 2007
    Marco Belinelli 24[b] / 34[c] 2014
    Klay Thompson 24 / 34[c] 2015
    Stephen Curry 23 / 34[c] 2016

    And the points are just higher because there are 4 extra money balls. Percentage-wise, the highest percentages were:

    1986, 2008, 1991, 1994, 1998, 2007, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2015, 2016.

    All the ones in the 10s made it purely because of the extra money balls.

    Shouldn't they be shooting 80%+ like scrubs in the 90s (Hodges) and 00s (Kapono)?
    Not that I'm defending the position that shooters are better today, but...can you really make an argument based on an all-star festivity?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •