Reply With Quote
Wrong.people thinking the organization that on politicians regardless of party is partisan
Quality bump.
Clipper Nation, sup?
Wrong.
Sub-par Quote, they remain far more objective than 99.99% of media outlets
Sup with your Bro, Tony poedesta, Reck?
Pootin succeeded, is winning, kept his hated Hillary out of office, destabilized US democracy with Trash, and will be equally "winning" if Trash gets removed, since USA democracy, stability, credibility would be damaged.
Pootin wants to up America, degrade it, doesn't care how that arrives.
Zero to full deflection in half a sentence.Sub-par Quote, they remain far more objective than 99.99% of media outlets
Sup with your Bro, Tony poedesta, Reck?
https://theintercept.com/2017/11/15/...llary-clinton/Despite the constant claims, from Assange and the Trumps, that the emails stolen from Democrats implicated Clinton in scandal and corruption, it is important to keep in mind that the WikiLeaks method of encouraging Trump supporters and Reddit trolls to scour the do ents for evidence of malfeasance did not, in fact, uncover any such evidence.
Instead, the hacked emails were used to reverse-engineer preposterous conspiracy theories, like the imaginary pedophilia scandal called Pizzagate, which WikiLeaks was still treating as real two months after the election.
This is the real tragedy and menace of the public and private collaboration of WikiLeaks with Trump. An organization with a sterling reputation for providing the public with accurate information about secret government and corporate activities was used to launder conspiracy theories that helped elect a racist, sexual predator president of the United States.
That might be a terrific result for people like Julian Assange, who see a dysfunctional, discredited White House as a way to undermine what they see as the real evil empire. For Americans condemned to live under Trump, particularly the most marginalized who, as Noam Chomsky has observed, will suffer the most from his cruelty, it is a far more troubling outcome.
Inspiring: How Julian Assange overcame the odds and
ended up sucking more than anyone ever thought he could
Assange and Wikileaks have become a case study in self-parody.
https://theoutline.com/post/2493/jul...?utm_source=NL
“Strongly suggest your dad tweets this link if he mentions us,” WikiLeaks went on, pointing Trump Jr. to the link wlsearch.tk, which it said would help Trump’s followers dig through the trove of stolen do ents and find stories. “There’s many great stories the press are missing and we’re sure some of your follows [sic] will find it,” WikiLeaks went on. “Btw we just released Podesta Emails Part 4.”
Trump Jr. did not respond to this message. But just 15 minutes after it was sent, as The Wall Street Journal’s Byron Tau pointed out, Donald Trump himself tweeted, “Very little pick-up by the dishonest media of incredible information provided by WikiLeaks. So dishonest! Rigged system!”
Wikileaks before 2016: The anonymity of whistleblowers is paramount.
Wikileaks after 2016: "Here's some data analysis to help you find your mole, Mr. Trump."
Not biased at all. (rolls eyes)
Lol Clit Nation
It appears Wikileaks was way off if it’s Fiona Hill.
Thread
I have no idea if that's correct. But LOL again at your sources.
So the insinuation is that Fiona Hill submitted an anonymous op-ed to the NYT because George Soros recently bought stock there?
Does The Chillum understand stocks?
Pretty weak attempt by cherry picking one tweet. That wasn’t the insinuation at all.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
