Reply With Quote
^Poor assumption.^
Let me guess. You're one of those cheap mother ers who still pays your helpers $7.25 like you've been doing since the 00s.
^Poor assumption.^
My family own a HVAC business in South Texas. I know exactly what I am talking about.
Are you sucking Cowboy's to be this certain?
I probably know more about CC than either of you. Let's see what his response is.
So then you are sucking his .
That's for damn sure. You just admited to having intimate knowledge of what goes in Cowboy's head so you must be sucking him off.
Uh, no.
EN regulating Clits like he's in between a pair of legs
"Socialism is the government taking over"
what ing bull
CC has been quite open as to how he compensates his employees. This is not news except for when it is apparently.
Trump back pedaling
http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/08/politi...lay/index.html
clinton and Obamas and walk street were practicing the imperial brand of globalism – not the same as globalization – that emanates from the Pentagon and Wall Street.
As Rakyn says:
it is basically an example of “oligarchy posing as the spread of democracy”. “Economically, poor nations are treated to a burlesque of Adam Smith’s ideas of a free market while in reality being burdened by colonialism and neocolonialism”
globalism, as attempted by Obama and Clinton Is just economic impoverishment through technology and imperialism.
Devil Clinton and her handlers was trying to pull a fast one and enslave most countries through their brand of goobalism. Thank God Trump came along
He's bi polar
@ fuzzyfakenews and his claims on how I compensate my employees . And then he openly admits to having "family" abusively paying minimum wage
Bet daddy's employees laugh about the second generation got loser.
nevermind.
Well of course the hit the fan when the impoverishment started to show in the backyard too. Everybody loves the cheap and nobody cares if the chinamen gets paid 6c/hour, until they start losing their own jobs to them.
clinton and Obamas and walk street were practicing the imperial brand of globalism – not the same as globalization – that emanates from the Pentagon and Wall Street.
As Rakyn says:
it is basically an example of “oligarchy posing as the spread of democracy”. “Economically, poor nations are treated to a burlesque of Adam Smith’s ideas of a free market while in reality being burdened by colonialism and neocolonialism”
globalism, as attempted by Obama and Clinton Is just economic impoverishment through technology and imperialism.
Devil Clinton and her handlers was trying to pull a fast one and enslave most countries through their brand of goobalism. Thank God Trump came along
Part of the reason Trump played his cards well on that subject in the rust belt.
Plenty of examples of this worldwide if you want me to enumerate. Notice that's socialism taken to it's purest form, much like we were talking about free-market taken to the extreme.
But you can go through Cuba, Venezuela, even recently Argentina... lots of cases of nationalization of private companies under the guise of social welfare.
Trump didn't play his cards well man, that's revisionist history. He played them a little less ty than Clinton did, and squeaked out a win because of it.
He talked tariffs, and factory jobs, and he was basically 1000000000000x more credible that Shillary in the one thing that mattered to them: opposing another trade accord in the TPP.
So maybe it was less ty card, but he hit the right notes.
no tariffs, no factory jobs, white working class gonna keep killing itself with guns, drugs, alcohol, reduced or no access to medical care.
Trash's voters gonna be no better off, probably worse off, in 2020.
But they will keep screwing themselves like they have been for 40+ years by voting Repug.
He might have lied, time will tell. At the very least, he was much more credible than Shillary-Kain saying they suddenly started hating the TPP... that is fairly indisputable, especially coming from Shillary.
Also, you're pretty confused if you think the only people that voted for him are "racist white working class". There's a good chunk of people that identified with Bernie, simply for being a straight shooter, that went with him.
There's no dancing around that even though Trump was a terrible candidate, Shillary was just as bad (or worse).
Trump on Immigration Power: I Can Do Whatever I Want
President Donald Trump defended his power to put limits on who can enter the U.S., saying it shouldn’t be challenged in the courts even as a three-judge panel weighs whether to reinstate restrictions on refugees and travelers from seven predominantly Muslim nations.
"You can suspend, you can put restrictions, you can do whatever you want," Trump told the chiefs, after reading the law. "It just can’t be written any plainer or better."
Earlier, in a posting on Twitter, Trump warned of dire consequences if his ban isn’t reinstated.
“If the U.S. does not win this case as it so obviously should, we can never have the security and safety to which we are en led,” Trump said. “Politics!”
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...idential-power
The DILFer Trash is 2-year old, stamping his feet, throwing a tantrum, demanding anything and everything, or else.
Trump Aide Derided Islam, Immigration And Diversity, Embraced An Anti-Semitic Past
wrote under a pseudonym last year that Islam is an inherently violent religion that is “incompatible with the modern West,” defended the World War II-era America First Committee, which included anti-Semites, as “unfairly maligned,” and called diversity “a source of weakness, tension and disunion.”
in the year leading up to the 2016 election, Anton operated as an anonymous booster of then-candidate Trump. Using the pen name Publius Decius Mus (the name of a self-sacrificing Roman consul), Anton promoted Trump’s anti-Islam, anti-immigration platform on fringe websites. The Weekly Standard revealed Publius to be Anton last week.
Americans in 2016 needed to “charge the pit” and prevent Hillary Clinton from winning the election — or die. The article, which ran in the Claremont Review of Books, was circulated widely on conservative and white nationalist websites. The New Yorker declared it “the most cogent argument for electing Trump” but cited the responses by Ross Douthat of The New York Times that he’d “rather risk defeat at my enemies’ hands than turn my own cause over to a incompetent tyrant” and by Jonah Goldberg of National Review that its central metaphor is “grotesquely irresponsible.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...term=HuffPost&
Just another white supremacist/nationalist assholes, attracted to Trash like flies on .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
