Reply With Quote
Trump supportersMurica this Murica that. gots putting a traitor in the white house
Here’s why Trump’s ‘everyone in DC is a criminal’ response to Russia allegations should worry Republicans
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/10/heres-why-trumps-everyone-in-dc-is-a-criminal-response-to-russia-allegations-should-worry-republicans/
Trump supporters
Looks like you’re on the second one.
That was really quick.
And unrelated to the election.
Way to go Donald. Fire one Special Prosecutor, give the next wide ranging capabilities.
This one must have been a slam dunk.
Clinton is a traitor!Trump supporters
*ding*
Looks like you’re on the second one.
can someone explain the conspiracy against the US charge?
Good to see you’ve moved on to the next stage.
Also, *ding*
There is no doubt Russia toyed our elections and more importantly, stuck it in our face.
The more important issue is the Trump WH ignoring this, not colluding with the Russians to mess with the election.
The collusion is looking very dead.
idk fam. we got some pretty juicy stuff on day 1. i think we have a lot more fuccery coming soon.the future looks bright for the USA
Big, big jump.idk fam. we got some pretty juicy stuff on day 1. i think we have a lot more fuccery coming soon.the future looks bright for the USA
Meetings to collusion.
We will see.
My boy djohn kept this thread real while I was gone. My .
“Walid Phares, who you probably know, PhD, adviser to the House of Representatives caucus, and counter-terrorism expert; Carter Page, PhD; George Papadopoulos, he’s an energy and oil consultant, excellent guy; the Honorable Joe Schmitz, [former] inspector general at the Department of Defense; [retired] Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg; and I have quite a few more. But that’s a group of some of the people that we are dealing with. We have many other people in different aspects of what we do, but that’s a representative group.”
Because, as we all know, money laundering for someone means that you can't be blackmailed by them later, and don't retain any contacts from that after it is over.
First it was "there weren't any real meetings about collusion", then Trump Jr.'s dumb ass meeting comes out, then it was "they are really investigating Hillary, where are the charges..."
meh. It is good to have someone who really thinks nothing happened here.
How much evidence do you need?
What would change your mind?
It’s conspiracy to commit FARA violations and not something more salacious like treason.
Enormous low hanging fruit. We've already seen a lot of the evidence against Manafort.
Do any of the charges against Manafort have anything to do with colluding with Russia during the election yes or no?Because, as we all know, money laundering for someone means that you can't be blackmailed by them later, and don't retain any contacts from that after it is over.
First it was "there weren't any real meetings about collusion", then Trump Jr.'s dumb ass meeting comes out, then it was "they are really investigating Hillary, where are the charges..."
meh. It is good to have someone who really thinks nothing happened here.
How much evidence do you need?
What would change your mind?
WE WILL SEE
http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog...pdate-16089277Did Papadopoulos Flip, And What Would That Mean For Trump?
The language of the charge against Papadopoulos makes it clear that he is cooperating with the Mueller investigation. That’s not a surefire sign he has “flipped” — giving information to investigators doesn’t, for example, mean he will testify against others — but it could still be bad for Trump.
Some indications that Papadopoulos is cooperating: He pled guilty to one charge of lying to the FBI, which he would be unlikely to do without some kind of incentive from Mueller. He is also only pleading guilty to one crime (with a five-year maximum sentence), which suggests that he may have bargained over what he was charged with — something that’s typical in cases of cooperation.
There are also some small details in the charge that come into brighter focus in the context of other reporting on Papadopoulos. One breadcrumb stands out:
In May 2016, Papadopoulos emailed a “high-ranking campaign official” (Manafort) writing: “Russia has been eager to meet Mr. Trump for quite sometime and has been reaching out to me to discuss.” In a footnote, the government added that the campaign official forwarded the email to another official (Rick Gates, without cc’ing Papadopoulos) and added, “Let[‘]s discuss. We need someone to communicate that DT is not doing these trips. It should be someone low level in the campaign so as not to send any signal.”
It’s not clear what “someone low level” was meant to do. It could simply be that the person was being delegated to give Papadopoulos the brush-off. But the fact that the other two people on the email thread were also indicted today — and that Papadopoulos is now in a position to explain the context of all of the exchanges cited in the charge to Mueller’s team — isn’t good news for Trump or the people in his orbit.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Posting Permissions
