Reply With Quote
It's the same story.
What are you saying changed, Chris?
This is a new story Pleb.
It's the same story.
What are you saying changed, Chris?
Chris, do you understand the concept of no privacy on a government computer?
Dude made sure to include "our ongoing criminal investigation" to shread any doubts that Trump is his cronies aren't under one.
AlsoHaving to have Mueller's spokesman to actually come out and say something.
This is the first time that's ever happened since he started this investigation.
Very Important – House GOPers Likely Agreed to President’s Demands
Chairman Devin Nunes has directly intervened and assisted in Mike Flynn’s effort to disrupt the investigation into Flynn himself.
And as Schiff notes, his Republican colleagues seem to be taking rapid steps to end the probe.
Clearly, Schiff has some adversarial or partisan reasons for saying that. But
the facts seem to bear him out.
So here’s the question,
is it really remotely plausible that the President,
having personally pressed Senators repeatedly to shut down their investigation
hasn’t done the same on the House side?
Of course he has.
It seems very much like we haven’t heard anything about it because
they’ve agreed to do just as he asked.
With Chairman Nunes his direct and open role as essentially a pro-Trump operative is right there in the open.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/...idents-demands
Remember it was bag Nunes who made a nighttime run to the WH to leak Congress info to Trash.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 12-17-2017 at 05:40 PM.
Yeah that was deliberate and a warning shot to anybody trying to interfere.Dude made sure to include "our ongoing criminal investigation" to shread any doubts that Trump is his cronies aren't under one.
Also
This is the first time that's ever happened since he started this investigation.
Trump just now....is not looking good.
Trump just now....is not looking good.
No he said that the Mueller investigation is not looking good.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireS...eller-51848570The president did criticize the fact that Mueller had gained access to thousands of emails sent and received by Trump officials before the start of his administration.
He said it was "not looking good" and again stressed that there was "no collusion." Mueller's team received the emails from a federal agency and not the transition itself.
But he was indeed looking like a disheveled drunk though.
No he said that the Mueller investigation is not looking good.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireS...eller-51848570
But he was indeed looking like a disheveled drunk though.
Why did someone tell you to post this, Darrin?
I'll go ahead and conclude it doesn't say what you want it to say.
Not in the least.
What exactly are you trying to say Darrin?
please. that's a very unfair question.
Keep on googling. Darrin. We will wait.
Nixon White House counsel: ‘Obstruction’ on Russia worse than Watergate — and it may bring Trump down
former White House attorney and Watergate figure John Dean explained that “It’s not the crime, it’s the cover-up” is once again in play as Special Counsel Robert Mueller investigates possible Russian collusion with Trump campaign officials.
“It’s still going to take time for this all to unfold,” Dean explained, adding that the real issue for Trump is that the president “might have obstructed justice to prevent the investigation by overreacting,” which could include the firing of former FBI Director James Comey.
Now that Mueller’s legal team has been able to obtain transition team emails, current White House officials who worked in the campaign may have placed themselves in jeopardy of being charged under the Logan Act.
“It certainly appears that the Logan Act, which has never been prosecuted by any prior administration against any incoming presidency, is kind of central,” Dean said.
“The Logan Act, for those who don’t know it, of course prohibits citizens from engaging in foreign affairs on behalf of the United States when they have no authority to do so.
And that’s exactly what the Trump people were doing
from day one after they found themselves as winners — they started cutting the sitting president.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2017/12/nix...e+Raw+Story%29
Guess the cat got his tongue.
Holy , that's the most truthful he's said for a decade, at least.
He said it was "not looking good"
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/latest-trump-firing-mueller-51848570
Will his big announcement next Friday be:
"I'm tired of this , ain't no fun, can't grab no pussies, but we Trashes have made a several $100Ms, so I'm resigning"
Even Chaffetz is turning on Sessions. Not good at all.
Jason Chaffetz Blasts Sessions, Time For Him ‘To Go’
Former Utah Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz blasted Attorney General Jeff Sessions Saturday, saying he should leave the Department of Justice.
When asked about Sessions on “Fox & Friends,” Chaffetz, who served on the House Judiciary committee, said Sessions is the reason why there is a special counsel, and criticized the former Alabama senator for his leadership over the Justice Department.
“It pains me to say this a little bit, [but] I don’t think the attorney general is up to the job he’s doing,” Chaffetz said. “The reason there is a special counsel is because he had to recuse himself from everything. I think it’s time for the Attorney General to go.”
Chaffetz also said there should not even be a special counsel and praised Inspector General Michael Horowitz, saying he will come up with the most definitive report in the time frame.
The former Utah congressman also criticized Sessions for not prosecuting Bryan Pagliano, the IT technician in charge of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal, who did not respond to a congressional subpoena. (RELATED: Does Bryan Pagliano Pleading The Fifth Mean Hillary Is More Likely To Be Deposed In Judicial Watch Case?)
“Can a person with this bad of a record go into human resources,” Chaffetz joked. “I mean that’s just unbelievable.”
http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/16/ja...for-him-to-go/
Chris, you scared?
"Is not looking good."
-Trump.
Not at all. Trump calls the shots.
Actually that would be the judiciary.
Fox News Contributor Repeats Fox News Mantra
BOOM
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions