Reply With Quote
Yes, it's the same as a one-year contract, so things like RFA and the Arenas exception still apply.
Does a two-way contract get you first dibs on a player the next year for a guaranteed contract? I'm guessing the Spurs signed Costello before someone else could, but unless this "dibs" thing is true, I don't see the advantage. He looks like a borderline NBA player at best, hard to know what his upside is.
Yes, it's the same as a one-year contract, so things like RFA and the Arenas exception still apply.
Can we still sign Diaw??
As a mentor at least?
Thanks. I actually failed to notice the "two-year deal" even though it's in the thread le. The second year is a QO then?
It says "two-way" not "two-year". Essentially, two-way deals are just a different type of contract, but they count as regular contracts in terms of accrued seasons and free agency. Also, they can be traded.
Next year, id love to see Marc Gasol at center,
then four all-around players....
This looks good to me. A lot depends on how well LMA handles still being a Spur, how Patty does as consistent starter, is Gay healthy, and is forbes ready to be the primary backup.
Like Bill Mc, I think this looks strong. If Gay is ready to play and LMA his all we have a lot of potential with this lineup although I see Murray being developed as a point guard. Forbes might have shot his way on to the backup pg.
Unlikely Davis starts. It's either going to be Gay or Pau. If neither works out, then Pop will look at alternatives, but by that point the alternative has to be evident through his play, just like it was with Dedmon (and after being promoted he showed he wasn't ready for it)... anyways the point is, Pop goes with his best established players and see what happens through the season.
Dijon is a real question mark here too. His unsteady play is a worry. I am not going to be swayed by a few bad SL games, but by what happened before then. Flashy play aside, he was an inefficient scorer last season, tends to force a very inefficient floater, is very TO prone, and doesn't seem to have improved on that. His being sat down in SL is also a sign that the Spurs need him to go back to the drawing board and work on fundamentals. I have no idea who starts but I am guessing Patty until someone really shows up he's fully deserving.
agree.
This is what I expect... with Manu in when he's active and Murray in when Manu is resting. There is an outside chance Brandon Paul can compete with someone's minute but I really haven't watched him play and the first season in the league is an adjustment even for the more talented players. If someone falters or there are injuries that is B.Pau's opportunity.
Trash poster. Forbes over Dejounte Murray and Patty Mills.
Murray was struggling and mills is . I was happily wrong on Murray and can admit it. Too bad you never admit your obvious incorrect statements , your insecurity is showing
Trash poster. Forbes over Dejounte Murray and Patty Mills.
marinoman.
Porker fluffer aka Patty Mills hater.
I'm going to sleep. I like exposing trash posters.
Don't step up to the big dogs next time. RIP marino got. Didn't even make it past 1k posts.
Nope, Parker’s best days are behind him but played well in the playoffs this year. Mills once again sucked
Porker broke down during the playoffs. Kinda like certain posters.
Lol, your ego is out of wack. You probably started watching the spurs when you found this forumDon't step up to the big dogs next time. RIP marino got. Didn't even make it past 1k posts.
If Parker wasn’t there against Memphis we would’ve lost.Porker broke down during the playoffs. Kinda like certain posters.
So to recap rasho, Parker and gasol are all in your 1% of bad spur contracts? Lol
Going to sleep. Maybe some other thread you can try again.
Nonanswer…No surprise
dabom semen shielding for Mills per par...
spurstalk expression by the way.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
