I don't care if it's seven on one. If the seven are ing idiots, I'll be the one; ing tools.
Yea, these guys just walked into their local NFL stadium and put in an application to be head coach.
I don't care if it's seven on one. If the seven are ing idiots, I'll be the one; ing tools.
You're definitely dominating this thread Spurtacular don't let nobody tell you different
Oh boy, I didn't see this either. look at the names on this list:
Michael Jordan: yeah he clearly couldnt compete in the NBA so they gave him a participation trophy
Muhammad Ali: just couldn't compete in that fast paced world of the boxing
Walter Payton: tried his best but was merely participation trophy material in the NFL imo
You're a lightweight, dude. Handed you your ass for fun the first time; ain't planning on making a chore out of it though.
You see the dude in the middle? He's not top fifty; not even close. Or did you really think it was about calling everyone on the list?
# ingMoron
^^^
They had to put a bow in his hair so that you'd know it's a "woman".
look at this in guy following me around like a goddamn stray dog.
Who's a good boy? Are you a good boy? Yes you are! You ready to do a trick? Heel! Good boy!
^^
Are you trying, or do you just suck that much?
have you printed aarony's post yet and hung it on your wall?
That it's on his wall is sufficient.
Good thing they ain't giving out awards or trophies for this thread I said! Cuz I know one guy who probably wouldn't like the particular kind of trophy he gets!
tbh an AaronY post is generally the kiss of death. Considering he's the most passive aggressive poster on the site who only comes in after everyone has dogpiled on you, it's usually not a good sign when you see him around imho
The coaches have resumes, strengths, weaknesses, regardless of whether they're rookie head coaches or not. It takes a special kind of moron to not get that. It takes an even more special moron to trump this up after getting hung with an L (I'm not referring to you).
So their participation trophy was being put at the bottom of the list and they should have that removed? So they should be taken off the list even though it's a list of head coaches and they were active head coaches at the time. Which means removing them from the list. Does that about sum it up?
Now you're just arguing that guy that made the list was lazy and should have put more effort into it.
You're clearly putting words into my mouth. For instance, show me where I talked about coaches not being included on the list. Try to follow along instead of making up fallacious arguments.
I never argued that he was lazy (causation). I said that he was too afraid to put someone last and handed out participation trophies. Geez, you guys can't follow arguments for .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)