Response calibration:
Anti trump result = liberal activist judges
Pro trump result = principled judge upholding the Cons ution
djohn2oo8 sucks Kyle Griffin
Travel ban rejected. Again.
Liberals love courts subverting the law.
Tired of winning, tbh...
That shows a fundamental misunderstanding of what the court is doing here.
Enlighten me on these "fundamentals," snowflake.
It's reviewing an executive order."the law"
Ah, so splitting hairs, basically.It's reviewing an executive order.
Nope, it's not subverting law at all. In any way.
Supreme Court allows full Trump travel ban to take effect
The Supreme Court on Monday gave President Trump another major win by granting his administration’s request to fully reinstate the third version of his travel ban.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and a federal district court in Maryland had said Trump could only block the entry of nationals from the six majority-Muslim countries in the ban — Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia and Chad — if they lacked a bona fide relationship with a person or en y in the United States. The high court’s decision now puts those rulings on hold.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Sonia Sotomayor said they would have denied the government’s request.
ADVERTISEMENT
The state of Hawaii and the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) challenged Trump’s latest ban, arguing the Supreme Court carved out the same bona fide relationship exemption in June when it partially reinstated Trump’s 90-day ban on nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Sudan and Yemen.
When that order expired on Sept. 24, Trump issued new restrictions that eliminated Sudan from the ban but added Chad, North Korea and individuals affiliated with certain government agencies in Venezuela. The lower court bans did not block the restrictions on Venezuelan officials or immigrants from North Korea.
The Trump administration argued that a lot has changed since June.
“Multiple government agencies have conducted a comprehensive, worldwide review of the information shared by foreign governments that is used to screen aliens seeking entry to the United States,” Solicitor General Noel Francisco argued in court papers.
“Based on that review, the proclamation adopts tailored entry restrictions to address extensive findings that a handful of particular foreign governments have deficient information-sharing and iden y-management practices, or other risk factors.”
Hawaii’s attorney, Neal Katyal, said in court papers “it is difficult to conceive of a more flagrant example of discrimination because of nationality.”
IRAP attorney Omar Jadwat sent a letter to the court Monday morning to inform the justices of “changed cir stances” in the case, specifically the controversial videos about Muslims that Trump retweeted last week.
Jadwat also informed the court that the sister-in-law of one plaintiff in the case and the mother-in-law of another had received their visas.
He said the fact that these “particular plaintiffs have now been reunited with their loved ones — or some of their loved ones — thanks to the preliminary injunction underscores how imminent the proclamation’s threatened injuries are and how crucial the injunction in this case is for the plaintiffs and others similarly situated.”
The court's decision to reinstate the full ban came a few hours later.
Monday marked the second time the Supreme Court has been asked to intervene on the president's travel restrictions. The Supreme Court canceled oral arguments and ultimately tossed out two cases challenging Trump’s previous ban in October. The move was largely seen as a victory for the administration even though the court did not rule on the merits of the case.
The justice said the cases were moot since the orders had expired and there was no longer a “live case or controversy” to settle.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is scheduled to hear arguments in Hawaii’s challenge to the ban on Wednesday, while the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals is scheduled to hear arguments in IRAP’s challenge on Friday.
The 9th circuit is based in San Francisco, while the 4th Circuit is based in Richmond, Va.
“In light of its decision to consider the case on an expedited basis, we expect that the Court of Appeals will render its decision with appropriate dispatch,” the Supreme Court orders said.
In a statement Monday evening, Jadwat, director of the Immigrant Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, said “President Trump’s anti-Muslim prejudice is no secret — he has repeatedly confirmed it, including just last week on Twitter.”
“It's unfortunate that the full ban can move forward for now, but this order does not address the merits of our claims. We continue to stand for freedom, equality, and for those who are unfairly being separated from their loved ones,” he said. “We will be arguing Friday in the Fourth Circuit that the ban should ultimately be struck down.”
http://thehill.com/regulation/court-...to-take-effect
Will have no effect on USA security
just another stain on the white male supremacist as he panders to his white male supremacist base, and their ignorant, masochistic women.
What is this ban for, again?
To stop incidents like in Vegas.
Courts will likely strike it down again later this week tbh
... and like TX church massacre, OKC bombing, Sandy Hook, stop Dylan Roof type, etc
Oh, well Q says that the Vegas shooting is all part of Trump's wonderful plan for our lives.
NRA, Repugs say gun slaughter of 10Ks of Americans is the price of freedom.
Lol trump
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
