Holy you just went full PeeWee never go full PeeWee
Same thing in the Senate
Holy you just went full PeeWee never go full PeeWee
another post they’ll pretend doesn’t exist
Everything I say is "bull ."
I see you have me in the crushing grip of reason.
Don't strain yourself fleshing out your argument, I would hate for you to pull a muscle.
Of course blacks vote along racial lines. The Republican party at almost all levels s all over blacks in this country every chance they get. "welfare queens" "thugs" "all lives matter", etc.
Republican rank and file make it about race all the time and cause black people to not really have much of a choice.
cause --> effect
Not really that hard, especially if one takes an objective look at the evidence.
Last edited by RandomGuy; 10-06-2017 at 10:52 AM.
http://www.people-press.org/2016/09/...tical-parties/
The composition of Republican and Republican-leaning registered voters has also grown somewhat more diverse over the last 24 years, though the pace of change lags behind that of the country overall and
the [Republican] party remains overwhelmingly white.
In 1992, 93% of Republican voters were white; that share has declined somewhat to
86% today.
The share of Hispanic voters in the GOP has edged up from 3% to 6%. There has been no increase in the share of Republicans who are black; blacks made up 2% of all Republican voters in 1992 and make the same share of all GOP registered voters today.
Racial lines.. not party lines. No black, no vote.
Proving my point. You really think all of that 86% is men?
Black women had the highest turnout of any group in 2008 and 2012 and second highest in 2016. They get out and voteso another irrelevant point by you
So race wasn't an issue during the 1960's or anytime before 2008?
Argue with the same website you referenced. It's their data.
What is your point here itt?
That the reason the GOP is in power is because the black voter turnout was so low because Hillary is white. The blacks didn't turn out for the dems. Ergo percentage doesn't seem to matter, only skin color of the candidate.
Politics isn't just the GOP. If people don't trust the GOP, don't vote for them. Oddly they won.
Last edited by DMC; 10-08-2017 at 10:18 PM.
So why did Blacks turn out in numbers for Dollar Bill?
Point out in the data where a higher percentage of blacks voted during Bill's campaign than during Hillary's.
Bill's first year brought everyone out. You see a steady increase in Blacks participating except his second term in which all people stayed home. 1996 was uninteresting. Even Bush brought participation. Then the dive for Hillary. There ya go.
A small decline in black voting would have still been okay if not compounded by targeted voter suppression. But much easier to blame the blacks for not working harder, and to call them the racists, as usual.
Well the data is right there. Argue with that.
I'm still looking for you to back up your leading question to prove that it has any merit.
I'm explaining the data. No need to argue with it.
You read data in a vacuum, you get no real analysis.
Sorry. If you can't see the largest negative slope on your graph in what was an upward trend I can't help you.
Hillary had a greater turnout of black voters than did Bill. So your point is moot. Reload and try again.
Where is your evidence for targeted voter suppression?
You aren't very bright. You seem to not have a firm understanding of data.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)