John Tyler and Bill Taft were avowed Muslims.
Anyway, changing the subject doesn't make you less wrong about veteran Presidents. But I'm glad you changed it all the same. Thanks for the laugh.
Trump won't even defend himself against Pop. Trump goes after Rosie O'Donnell, but he won't touch Pop.
Trump finally calls military widow, tells her 'he knew what he signed up for'
"Yes, he said it," Wilson said. "It's so insensitive. He should have not have said that. He shouldn't have said it."
It took the Idiot-in-Chief almost two weeks to come up with those words of comfort? Maybe he needs to go back to ignoring military deaths and stick to (cheating at) golf.
https://m.dailykos.com/stories/1707681
Spin it, you Trash fellators, spin Trash's kind words of sympathy, empathy, condolences.
That would be awesome!
Hillary won Bexar County...
You left off founder of Isis and domestic terrorist to Obama's super villain status.
Rent free...
He is the president of the most influential country on the face of the Earth ya damn moron... Rent free...
Like he tried to fly without feathers.
Yep, ducks will provide for a full broadside onslaught of the bizarre.
Muslims been in America since colonial times, fought against the Brits
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_...#Early_records
If those early Muslims tangled with any Christian colonists, good luck, since those Christian colonists were as intolerant, nasty, self-righteous, misogynist as the current crop of Christian assholes.
"Put Christ back in .... Christians"
Triggered you enough to say something.
Sure, what about Comey cheerleading for Killary?
Is he a soulless coward?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-fre...120513843.html
, looks like we are going to need a new corollary for Godwins law.
The odds of a Trump thread having Hillary mentioned in a whataboutism approaches 1...
I think I said the same thing weeks ago.
Between Soros and Hillary, there definitely needs to be a new classification for ty redirects.
So you approve corruption and use of influences when it affects your side, that shows you are a corrupt person and is all about fitting your agenda.
She is a dirty piece of but he cant talk about her because she lost the election and thats enough according to you.
It's a natural assumption to make that you're ing because you lost, ergo the retort is about who you wish would have won instead.
Why do you act like it's a red herring to mention Hillary when she's the other side of the coin?
Relax, it hasn't even been a year. It took about 6 years for lefties to stop but but Dubya.
You realize W was the POTUS for eight years prior to Obama, right? You understand this analogy makes no sense, right?
A better comparison would be how frequently "lefties" harped on bringing up Mitt Romney or John McCian after they lost elections to Obama when someone was criticizing Obama. Can't recall much mention of them at all after the fact, tbh.
you're kind of a stupid person, aren't you?
Ohh Snap! Pusher with the "You're stupid" insult...again.
It hurts
Maybe if you stopped saying stupid , people would stop calling you stupid.
Do you not see what was wrong with your comparison? Or did you know it wasn’t an apt comparison and decided to say it anyway. Honest question.
Exactly. Partisan cheerleading above country.
impeach him. Hes not a sensitive man
"46% of Americans think the Media is inventing stories about Trump & his Administration." @FoxNews It is actually much worse than this!
great coaching job from pop. much respect to the GOAT.
There's nothing wrong with the comparison. Just because you think it's only about comparing what job each had doesn't mean that's how politics works. Democrats didn't spend so much effort trying to keep wildly unpopular Dubya the face of the party for no reason, even though he was no longer relevant. Difference is Dubya had the good sense to slink away into private life. Yeah we'll keep making Hillary the face of the Democratic party and she's all to happy to try and keep doing it herself. No matter how much you want her to go away she won't, like herpes.
Hillary is not the face of the Democratic Party. Obama represents the party better than she does and the only thing that prevented him from shoving his big black dong in trump’s ass electorally was the US cons ution. You and I both know that to be fact.
The comparison was absolute because W affected policy for 8 years. It’s totally legitimate for a liberal to complain about the effects of W’s presidency well into Obama’s presidency. It’s completely illegitimate to compare a losing candidate like Clinton with the show occurring that is Donald.
You’ve now proven yourself to be a complete moron.
Awesome.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)