I amend the former term prosecutorial tone to be prosecutorial direction. What research have you done counter to my claim that justifies this? Your default bias has no relevance on justification.
"What nepotism?"
A single name isn't an acceptable answer.
My default position with you is you never know what you're talking about and wither under the simplest of questions. You proved me right again. Only makes you look stupid, tbh.Also, you've only taken on a prosecutorial tone on a matter you aren't even willing to investigate. This only makes you look impish, tbh.
I amend the former term prosecutorial tone to be prosecutorial direction. What research have you done counter to my claim that justifies this? Your default bias has no relevance on justification.
lol
All I did was ask a simple question about your claim.
You have a huge problem when I do. You shut down.
That's all.
Prosecuting a case for which you've done no research or put forth any counter claims.
I asked you one simple question and you go on a multiday meltdown.
So, you think it's all about answering "simple questions"? How come you've never bothered to answer the question of whether you've researched it or not?
Because you haven't even answered my first question.
The first question being "What nepotism?"
But... but... but.... "I asked first!"
Today's snowflake
It was a simple question about a claim you made.
All you've done since then is melt down.
What nepotism?
I don't answer stupid questions.
You don't answer any questions.
Today's coward.
By your own definition, you're a coward.
You've been dodging questions, right and left.
I never made any claims about nepotism or research.
You made the claims then melted down when asked simple questions about them.
I put forth the easily verifiable reality that their was nepotism among Obama's cohorts and it triggered you!
Today's snowflake.
You didn't verify it or say anything else about it. You yourself.
Today's meltdown.
So, you are unable to verify it for yourself; are you a special needs individual?
So, you are unable to verify it yourself by answering a simple question in a discussion; are you a special needs individual?
It's
your
claim.
I've told you that I'm perfectly able but won't unless you are special needs in need of an aide. Are you a special needs individual?
It's
your
issue.
I can only assume the attempt to deflect means you do understand it makes you look like a liar.
Would you say you are an honest person?
Again, not really an answer to a fair, simple question. It isn't a trick.
I was merely trying to get at your underlying cognitive dissonance.
I am sure you think you are an honest person. Most people think that they are. Yet, you make yourself look like a liar here. I was just wondering if you valued honesty.
Either you don't know you are lying, and are delusional, or do know you are lying and don't care. I find that interesting, but think that the former is more likely than the latter.
I think that is why I irritate you. I threaten that delusion, i.e. "I, DMC, hate both parties/sides equally". I point out that isn't the case, and you go into instant dissembling, just like you did here.
[question you can't answer, because you are an idiot]
Definition of nepotism
:favoritism (as in appointment to a job) based on kinship ·accused the company of fostering nepotism in promotions
# ingmoron.
... and you are moronically debating them on politics and AGW
So let's list Trump's direct nepotism here. Here is the first in-law.
Lara Trump, the face of her father-in-law's re-election campaign, has been hosting high-level meetings within the White House to push a variety of domestic policy initiatives, a clear crossing of the well-established line between campaign work and public service, ethics and government watchdogs told Newsweek.
The senior adviser to the president's already-active 2020 campaign has quietly conducted over half a dozen meetings with government officials including Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, Veteran Affairs Committee Chairman Phil Roe and Representative Ron DeSantis, in an effort to swing the administration’s support behind a $10 million federal initiative to establish a new nationwide Veterans Affairs program, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the meetings and accompanying legislation.
Lara's husbands brother. Given a scientist post, with no qualifications.
Jared "middle east peace" Kushner-- son-in-law
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)