Reply With Quote
You're going to have to be more clear with your deflections. I don't know what you're talking about.
Well, what about that time you said that Heather something mattered and it was going to change everything, and I told you nobody will remember her the next week.
I dont see people talking about her.
You're going to have to be more clear with your deflections. I don't know what you're talking about.
Thats a great deflection, but also comical because I knew I was right about that issue.
Feel free to explain it. I can see it's important to you. I don't mind reading it all.
Nah, the solely fact that you forgot the issue was enough to me.
And so did you.
Not much of a victory tbh -- but you have to take what you can get.
Heather
Lol, you are being even funnier!And so did you.
Not much of a victory tbh -- but you have to take what you can get.
Sure thing, Heather.
Chump had not response. It was incoherent garble he offered up.
I know English isn't his first language, but that made less sense than usual tbh.
Did you have any actual legal charges for Wasserman-Schultz?
I guess talking about salad is an adequate response to you, bruh.
Word salad. It means his sentence didn't make sense because the words were ill placed.
Chump is awesome, now he doesnt remember Heather.
Oh, you're talking about Heather Heyer?
The Virginia election showed that people remembered her quite well.
But you wouldn't know about that. You're too busy trying to deflect in a thread that has nothing to do with that.
And the usual false narrative about a tantrum.
There is no liberal idiot you won't sperm shield for, is there?
I was perfectly willing to hear him out. As I am you with your charges against Wasserman-Schultz.And the usual false narrative about a tantrum.
I simply asked you what legal charges you would bring against her.There is no liberal idiot you won't sperm shield for, is there?
What legal charges would you bring against her?
I ain't none too worried about it at the moment, tbh.
It's OK to just admit you couldn't think of even one tbh.
What charges would you bring against her?
Since I'm not the one who thinks she's a criminal, none. I think she's just stupid.
You're willfully naive. It's highly doubtful that she's not a criminal.
What charges would you bring against her?
That would have nothing to do with your naivety.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Salad