Reply With Quote
I doubt that
, qtsa has gone hiding, err, has gone to work in Korea again, so we will never see one of his text wall defense again.
I doubt that
Yam s' lawyer want to exclude the testimony of Northwestern University marketing professor Ashlee Humphreys. Seems she is too good at screwing Yam s over and are terrified.
In May, during the first civil case brought by Carroll, Humphreys testified about the financial damage Trump’s alleged sexual assault and defamation had done to the writer’s reputation. A jury concluded that Trump had indeed sexually assaulted Carroll and awarded her $5 million.
Humphreys was also a witness in the defamation trial of Giuliani brought by Georgia election workers Freeman and Moss, testifying last week regarding damages. The jury in that case ordered Giuliani to pay Freeman and Moss $148 million.
In their filing last week, Trump’s lawyers faulted the methodology used by Humphreys to calculate financial damages.
“The damages estimations in her initial report are egregiously inflated (to the tune of millions of dollars), utilize methods which ascribe harm in an unreliable and incorrect manner; and do not accurately reflect the actual harm to plaintiff’s reputation,” Madaio wrote in the filing.
Imagine seeking only $10 million from Yam s for defamation and being awarded $83 million!!!!
Yam s must be a certified asshole for the jury to decide lickety-split and up the award that much..
...no, he just made President, without permission>>>that's all it took...Imagine seeking only $10 million from Yam s for defamation and being awarded $83 million!!!!
Yam s must be a certified asshole for the jury to decide lickety-split and up the award that much.
After all those failed lawsuits to overthrow the election and all his other legal troubles, you would think that Yam s would have the experience of finding a competent lawyer.
But having a lawyer up so badly that a $10M lawsuit turns into losing $83M? That is some kind of special!
letting Trump testify and act like an asshole in court certainly didn't helpAfter all those failed lawsuits to overthrow the election and all his other legal troubles, you would think that Yam s would have the experience of finding a competent lawyer.
But having a lawyer up so badly that a $10M lawsuit turns into losing $83M? That is some kind of special!
I figure that Yam s will use his magic sharpie to re-write all this loser history as being a witch-hunt.
But damn, the whole book will be blacked out and only legible parts will be the le and Yam s, author.
The gullible will then all agree that the middle initial of Yam J. s really stands for “Jenius.”
Ain’t that a of a way to live but it explains why the Nigerians find boomers as easy marks.
...no, he just made President, without permission>>>that's all it took...
What genius uses a lawyer that converts a potential $10M lawsuit into a $83M lawsuit loss?
The President of the United States; Donald Trump.What genius uses a lawyer that converts a potential $10M lawsuit into a $83M lawsuit loss?
That's why we're here of a Saturday mornin', son.
FA FO
That's what one gets when one makes President like that.
tee, hee.
It has a ring to it, much like "no may mean yes but either way, it is ok, as an indictment is not a conviction."
"They say that I got killed."
Dumbass can't shut his ing mouth.
Though he did make President. That's why we're here of a Saturday morning, and all Saturday mornings to come.Dumbass can't shut his ing mouth.
Let us proceed...
It cost Yam s $83M to play the victim.Dumbass can't shut his ing mouth.
"They say that I got killed."
The reason it was sex assault instead of rape is because the victim could not 100 percent be certain if it was an orange penis or an orange pinky finger which penetrated her.It has a ring to it, much like "no may mean yes but either way, it is ok, as an indictment is not a conviction."
I only wish - for reals - I was making this up!
You're definitely as dumb as I've stated many times over. Show 1 iota of evidence to any of carol's bs story because even she couldn't produce a shred of evidence. I'd like to see what you got though you ing re .The reason it was sex assault instead of rape is because the victim could not 100 percent be certain if it was an orange penis or an orange pinky finger which penetrated her.
I only wish - for reals - I was making this up!
The ONLY thing certain? He made President. And that's all it takes.
Her case was proved in court by a jury.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
