Can we agree on this 3.0?

[ernest787]

thread is backed hard.

With Kawhi back and Gay on the roster there is really no need for Kyle. Gay does everything Kyle can do 1000xs better. He also is an actual play maker, unlike this weird narrative spun around Kyle.

[hater]

stupid thread

Kawhi can barely wipe his ass at this point and looks like a slower slightly more re ed Kyle Anderson

if you really squint your eyes and rewatch Kawhi vs Mavs you'd think it Kyle

[unleashbaynes]

Aw i actually liked KA this year. Sneaky defense and passing.

[SAGirl]

^ of course, but Nono is just a troll these days.

[Gagnrath]

Kyle has been effective this year. He wasn't bad last year. I see him as a fairly solid role play in rotation at both forward positions. Provided he comes back fully from injury he's a decent minutes eater at both spots. I don't think he can be a star but a quality player sure. He needs a bit more confidence in his shooting, and otherwise he's fine. He does a good job of being in the right place, and provides good effort. I want to see him get a little bit stronger as the heft he has added hasn't made him any slower and he isn't out quicking anyone anyway. What the Spurs seem to have realized and many other teams haven't is that if you have a couple of stars and a good core of little known journeyman players who work well as a team you are compe ive with anyone. The other teams seem to always want to chase potential stars instead of letting a team gel.

[Brazil]

[Raven]

he's a good players, and good players are always valuable. He can be switched around, making it less risky to play our main guys heavy minutes in the play offs.