Reply With Quote
Wow!
Hannity!
This blockbuster episode of Hannity is straight-up damning.
Just some of the new damning evidence:
* Comey's exoneration statement on Hillary: 'grossly negligent' changed to 'extreme carelessness' in two places.
* Comey's exoneration statement on Hillary: Re foreign actors gaining access to Hillary's server, 'reasonably likely' change to possible.
* Come wrote Hillary's exoneration statement on May 2 or sooner. FBI hadn't even interviewed Hillary until July 4th.
* FBI Deputy (Former Chief Of Counter Intelligence Division / Initial Top 2017 Special Counsel Agent) Peter Strzok sought out (via text message) an "insurance policy" against Trump in the event he was elected (not Hillary). Text was sent to Andre McCabe, the Deputy Head FBI Director.
* Lisa Page, initially a lawyer for the Mueller team, call Trump a "menace" in a text message to her lover/boyfriend, Strzok (before the investigation).
* Strzok the 'man' who actually signed the do ent that kicked off the nothingburger Russian investigation.
* Strzok's team oversaw the anti-Trump 'dossier' handed over to the FBI.
* Strzok in charge of the interview of former NSA Head Michael Flynn.
* Strzok sat in on the interviews with Huma, Cheryl Mills, Hillary, etc.
* Mueller's relationship with Comey is a blantant conflict of interest.
* Strzok/Comey obstruction of justice for Hillary.
* Comey had initially written in the exoneration statement that 'the sheer volume of classified do ents on the Clinton server is evidence of criminality'.
* Hillary Clinton made deal with Obama State Dept to keep call logs / schedules secret.
* NSA surveillance program to catch misdeeds of foreigners used to do backdoor warrant-less searches on American citizens (weaponized intelligence community).
* DOJ official (Bruce Orr) removed for concealing meeting with Fusion GPS (previously known).
* Congress looking into Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's doings / compromised actions.
* Mueller's "pitbull" and top deputy attended Hillary's election night party.
* "Cesspool of corruption" - "A system of corruption."
Wow!
Hannity!
Fox is dictating to psycho Trash, with complicity of Congressional Repugs, that it's perfectly OK, even requried, to fire Mueller.
I pretty sure Trash will do it, and Repug Congress and Cabinet will do nothing, except maybe applaud.
lol Hannity
With all this damning evidence, surely her arrest is imminent... right?
Whatever you do, don't ask OP what charges should be brought against her.
Hannity doesn’t break any news. He just summarizes breitbart and drudge in the last 24 hours
Just change 'Liberals' for 'Conservatives' and 'MSNBC' for 'Fox'...
chumpettes
How about you look at those actions and tell us what charges should be brought if true, given that you always want to play the prosecutor.
I never made the claim she should be brought up on charges.
That was you.
What do you think she should be charged with?
You can't even bring yourself to say the charges, can you?
Can you believe this is his go-to tactic?
Why don't you answer your question for me in a way that makes me look like I'm not dodging your question and also make me look like I'm not an idiot, pweeze?
I never made the claim she should be brought up on charges.
That was you.
What do you think she should be charged with?
I don't really understand gotacular either.
^^^
Just showing how afraid of the implications of your heroes' actions you are. Tell us the charges. It shouldn't be too difficult, but you can't even bring yourself to say them.You'll go on for however many pages instead.
I never made the claim she should be brought up on charges.^^^
Just showing how afraid of the implications of your heroes' actions you are. Tell us the charges. It shouldn't be too difficult, but you can't even bring yourself to say them.
That was you.
What do you think she should be charged with?
Should be easy for you since you are the one who says she should be charged with multiple crimes.
It's your idea. Support it. Asking someone else to support it.^^^
Just showing how afraid of the implications of your heroes' actions you are. Tell us the charges. It shouldn't be too difficult, but you can't even bring yourself to say them.
Where did I do that in this thread? You brought up charges. Tell us what you think they should be based on the purported evidence. Can you do it; or are you too much of a snowflake?
Oh, you don't think she should be brought up on any charges at all then?
Alright.
We agree.
Good job.
^^^
Snowflake just gonna make up more narratives. I'd laugh but I've read this book a thousand times over now.
OK, let's clear this up once and for all then:
I do not think any criminal charges should be brought against Hillary Clinton.
Do you think any criminal charges should be brought against Hillary Clinton?
Yes or no.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
