No proof at all? None?
Would people be critical of a truly ty president? Wouldn't there be a lot of bad coverage that president didn't like?
No proof at all? None?
No proof at all. Otherwise please post it and Ill gladly review
but but but manafort, flynn, and that damn meeting with trump jr???? lol
lol adoptions
Where did you way you got your news again?
calf tats clearly establishing himself as one of the top 3 idiots on this subforum - ducks and Chris have some compe ion now
i'm trying... i hope to be #1 asap!
Can't be very good if you don't get the adoption reference.
they're all running for second. spurtacular is unopposed
bunch of ing re s with yalls dumbass re online awards.
you mean like the re in chief with his fake news awards?
exactly! i think it's pathetic too. i totally agree with you on that. our president shouldn't even bother with the "news" networks and just keep going forward.
If he didn't possess the sensorium of a tantramatic 9 year old girl, he could.
there's a lot wrong with the dude sure. i don't want a president acting like i do here on ST. lol
i want real change but unfortunately i don't think that's ever going to happen in my lifetime.
Came back here to see if Randomguy or anyone posted proof. Nothing yet?
I am wilking to change my mind on the whole Russia collusion deal if someone ANYONE posts proof....
Would people be critical of a truly ty president? Wouldn't there be a lot of bad coverage that president didn't like?
What proof would convince you?
Meetings between campaign officials and Russian assets?
Data-sharing? Money provided on behalf of the candidate?
Tell me what evidence you would accept first.
Damn you're lazy
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)