Reply With Quote
Which makes your calling your own self a Hillary sperm shielder the ultimate self-checkmate and failure.Declining to do your bidding is one thing. Calling your own self a Hillary sperm shielder is another.
Liberals never came across a double standard they couldn't embrace, tbh.Lib s are like...
Which makes your calling your own self a Hillary sperm shielder the ultimate self-checkmate and failure.Declining to do your bidding is one thing. Calling your own self a Hillary sperm shielder is another.
How is this a double standard, Spurtacular?
Explain.
Quote it. You've said this enough without any proof.Which makes your calling your own self a Hillary sperm shielder the ultimate self-checkmate and failure.
Is it important to you?
I called you out and there's nothing you can do about it (other than create gimpy distractions), like a .
You honestly don't remember making up these little rules?I called you out and there's nothing you can do about it (other than create gimpy distractions), like a .
I'm calling you out. No one is this stupid.
Are you this stupid?
If you think you got something, post it instead of pussyfooting around. You ain't got nothing but made-up nonsense.You honestly don't remember making up these little rules?
I'm calling you out. No one is this stupid.
Are you this stupid?
How is it not, chump?
Explain.
Are you seriously demanding I repost your definition for everyone to see here?If you think you got something, post it instead of pussyfooting around. You ain't got nothing but made-up nonsense.
Zuckerberg enters into a legal agreement with Facebook users to share their information. Facebook users enter that agreement of their own free will and actively choose to use the Facebook service.
This is absolutely nothing like Assange.
At all.
You idiot.
I couldn't demand you repost something that doesn't exist (at least what you have purported).
Then what are you demanding here?
Facebook was a part of PRISM. Sorry; you lose.
Demanding nothing. I'm calling you out on making up.
How does that make Zuckerberg Assange?
Explain.
I never argued that. You're having a hard time keeping up.
Oh, what's the double standard then?
Explain.
You couldn't name a Hillary crime so you're obviously semen shielding for her.
I have sufficiently argued that you cannot even answer the question of whether Hillary likely committed a crime in Whitewater. Your sperm shielding is complete. Congrats, liberal cuck.
Villainizing a guy who delivers the truth for the common good vs. villains violating your privacy for money/power. I don't care if you call it a double standard or just outright idiocy, tbh.
You already admitted Assange violated the privacy of hundreds of people by intentionally making their personal information public.
Your government has already said that there is no expectation of privacy for anything done online. <Pat on the back> Maybe, you'll get the next one.You already admitted Assange violated the privacy of hundreds of people by intentionally making their personal information public.
Link?
Also explain how that is like Assange's intentionally releasing medical records with personal information.
This is new to you?
CNN strikes back, skewers Trash like a suckling pig
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=skwcd9qw9IY
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
