The real problem is that the team isn't playing "Aldridge ball"; they are just using Aldridge as the first option with the roster they've had available. The team isn't and wasn't supposed to be built around LMA -- therefore, this was never a good time to make such a claim. That's where half of the ire against this thread came from. The other half comes from the fact that this was not a hot take but has been presented and defended as if it's some revolutionary idea other people only disagree with because they don't "get" it. It's actually a really worn out anti-postup take. We've been seeing this since people realized Al Jefferson wasn't a superstar many years ago.
As a bonus is the conflation with being able beat the Warriors in a series with being able to win a le in the three-point era. The Spurs damned sure would have been able to win a le last year had Durant and Curry fallen down a mine shaft or something. It's not about the "modern NBA"; it's about not being able to win a talent advantage with an insanely stacked team. They handled the other "modern" NBA team last year easily, and many folks thinking they would do so this year if they can get healthy and in sync. I can't imagine what sweeping claims DAF would be making if ST were around during the Jordan dynasty.