Reply With Quote
WW3 IMMINENT
ma niga Lavrov went no lube balls deep on US criminal state
U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper explained in a press conference Tuesday, that a new U.S. force will be stationed in eastern Syria to protect the oil fields. Barbara Starr, CNN’s Pentagon reporter, pressed Esper on whether the US military mission there will be to prevent the Russian or the Syrian government forces from accessing the oil at Deir Ez Zor. Esper was forced to admit that the mission was designed to prevent the oil, and revenues generated, from being used by any group other than the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), otherwise referred to as the Kurdish militia who had been US allies in the fight to defeat ISIS.
WW3 IMMINENT
Come and take it.
Or just call Dennison and tell him to leave.
bingo the oil fields were pirate USA has stationed is mostly Sunni Arab Syrians. minority are kurds. yeah lets give it all to the kurds that will go very well with the population
Dennison got manipulated into stationing troops there because he has a child's understanding of oil issues.bingo the oil fields were pirate USA has stationed is mostly Sunni Arab Syrians. minority are kurds. yeah lets give it all to the kurds that will go very well with the population
hater
Crimea
mostly russian and home to strategic homeland defense base and port
try again....
#stillwithher
*DING*
Crimea, Ukraine (Since 1954)
and? national security ma niga. closing access to black sea and facing missiles minutes from Moscow was a death sentence
assads syrian on the other hand was never a threat to our nat sec
Lawless Trash, unlike Lawful Obama, doesn't know, and wouldn't care, that taking another countries' oil is illegal, a war crime, but that's the kind of criminal, stupid, ignorant prick all y'all kickers and Bible-humpers have elected.
They conquered the old Khanate from the locals in the Russo-Ottoman wars ~250 years ago and then went genocide multiple times most recently under Stalin. Then of course there was the treaty where Russia ceded the land to Ukraine.
That Russia wanted it is not cause for invasion.
as I said. It was a decision based on direct threat to national security. we would have done the same in a millisecond
and if we are talking about treaties and agreements lets talk about the broken NATO non expansion agreement
Nonsense. There are all kinds of strategic points in central and south america we don't invade. ukraine never invaded Russia or made threats to do so. that is asinine.
and there was no nonexpansion treaty. Bush's WH unilaterally said they wouldn't expand. Germany had other ideas.
I do like how you have gone full russophile again though.
name the strategic points that have been overthrown by a US adversary
obviously ukraine cannbarely wipe its own ass. its the nato led coup and plans to bring in Ukraine into nato thus making it free for de facto US bases that was the threat
I'm not entertaining this logic. The Russians violated their treaty granting Crimea to Ukraine. All the other justifications you have put out are meaningless given that context.
Ukraine joining NATO is not justification for violating the treaty much less the possibility it might happen.
thought so
yet one broken promised happened before the other. Ill giveyou a hint. it was NATOsThe Russians violated their treaty granting Crimea to Ukraine. All the other justifications you have put out are meaningless given that context.
who broke theirs first
oh yeah it is. NATO is an alliance meaning any war with nato country and all of them join. a country just a few miles from moscow joining NATO is pretty good justification IMOUkraine joining NATO is not justification for violating the treaty much less the possibility it might happen.
Show me the NATO treaty that guaranteed no eastern expansion. I won't hold my breath.
And thanks for the bull quote of what I never said. I'm just not chasing a red herring.
here ya go ma nig.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/th...-wouldnt-23629
and you said there were countless examples of strategic places in Americas. but you cant name one
Russia’s got a point: The U.S. broke a NATO promise
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-e...nap-story.html
Yeah.
They said they had zero troops their, no problem.
Hater deflecting that his orange God got backed up into staying in Syria.
Poor guy can’t handle worshipping a liar and then having him lie.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
