Reply With Quote
Obviously orange does. Or else he wouldn't pay off pros utes or make them sign Non-Disclosure Agreements.
Lol everyone thought you were serious because it's you
Obviously orange does. Or else he wouldn't pay off pros utes or make them sign Non-Disclosure Agreements.
nah it's because yall are truly ing re ed.
President Trump was right............."If you are rich and famous, you CAAAAAAAAAN grab em by the pussy"
If Trump wasnt rich and famous the only pussy he would be grabbing is the neighborhood stray cat. Dis is no Brad Pitt......just sayin.
This would be his first sarcastic post ever.
He just usually yells loudly at a poster. He might be 5 years old now.
actually i use a ton of sarcasm here but re s like yall spin it. you're a ing re and that must suck.This would be his first sarcastic post ever.
He just usually yells loudly at a poster. He might be 5 years old now.
your point is? revelations!President Trump was right............."If you are rich and famous, you CAAAAAAAAAN grab em by the pussy"
If Trump wasnt rich and famous the only pussy he would be grabbing is the neighborhood stray cat. Dis is no Brad Pitt......just sayin.
what about the ones he attacked?
You seem to be avoiding addressing the sexual assaults. why is that? DO you think it is ok?
they're all fake just like their lawyers allred and daughter. as for stormy, she's a and billionaires can buy their way into any woman's pants. , 's can be bought with a watered down 7&7 at your neighborhood dive bar.
You choose to believe every assault claim because it fits your narrative. I dont automatically believe them. The guy clearly didnt have to rape women to get grade A pussy.
Yes you're the only genius here and it's everyone else that's re ed.
yall just love putting words into my mouth that i never ever claimed. you're ing re ed and though it's semi hard to deduce sarcasm through text for the regular person, it seems much harder for you and your mentally ill sidekicks.
You don't believe any of his accusers?
I dunno Chump. I dont really spend much time on the gossip rags and certainly havent seen any police reports. Times change and norms change.
More than a dozen women, all saying the same things, with the guy himself straight up bragging about doing the EXACT things these women accuse him of when he thought he wasn't being recorded.
I'm not saying that one has to automatically believe them, but it seems you are automatically dismissing them. Are you? Are they ALL lying?
Really?
What if you don't have the information of a police report?
Do you need police reports to make the determination as to what is more likely true?
If a woman decides not to involve the police, does that mean it DIDN'T happen? So, in your opinion NO woman has EVER been assaulted, and NOT gone to the police to accuse a powerful billionaire with an army of lawyers of something without any other witnesses?
That is beyond plausibility? really?
Chump ing read. I said I dunno. That means I dont know. I dont know the women, I dont know their credibility, their motivation, or the intimate details of their claims.
Ignorance is bliss.
And believing everything you read in the tabloids is stupid.
It is a case of the "magic R", IMO.
The moral, and intellectual bankruptcy required to be a modern conservative means giving people with the magic "R" all the benefit of the doubt, and automatically discounting anyone who says anything bad about them.
It is a cop out, and a chicken one in my book.
These women are clearly going for fame and of course MONEY. Why n the take hush money back then, yet now you want to spout off about the affairs? TV shows, news rags, magazines = CASH
What about what the women say directly in a press conference? In an interview?
Sorry dude, you get the kind of respect you deserve. This is some chicken answers, and you know it.
Who said I read it in the tabloids, CC?
You're completely ignorant about this. You admitted it. Don't get defensive about your complete ignorance after admitting it.
Posting Permissions
