Stormy Daniels

[DarrinS]

We can go back and forth all night with this bull but it doesn't change the fact that you are incapable of sticking to a topic when it requires you to acknowledge that the President of the United States is a ing lunatic.

You love you some Donald. You love him so much.

I was responding to RG's claim that there would be violence if Trump indicated he was robbed of the next election.

There was violence both before and after the 2016 election, MOSTLY by the left.

[DarrinS]

I can't imagine hanging outside a Hillary or Bernie rally and waiting to attack attendees. Wtf

[Spurminator]

I was responding to RG's claim that there would be violence if Trump indicated he was robbed of the next election.

His post was mostly about Trump's reaction. Predictably you had nothing to say about that.

There was violence both before and after the 2016 election, MOSTLY by the left.

What's your source for percent of politically motivated crimes by each side? Besides cherry-picked Youtubes?

[DarrinS]

What's your source for percent of politically motivated crimes by each side? Besides cherry-picked Youtubes?

I guess all the violent attacks on Hillary supporters weren't recorded.

[Spurminator]

I can't imagine hanging outside a Hillary or Bernie rally and waiting to attack attendees. Wtf

Well, consider the difference in rhetoric for a moment.

[ElNono]

David Dennison

[DarrinS]

Well, consider the difference in rhetoric for a moment.

Yeah

"You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” Clinton said. “The racist, sexist, phobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up."

[Spurminator]

I guess all the violent attacks on Hillary supporters weren't recorded.

I don't know, I don't scour Youtubes or get email alerts for violence against Hillary supporters.

You're just going to pretend all of the MAGA mass shooters don't count because they didn't happen outside of a Hillary rally, aren't you? White supremacists are pretty violent winners, I can understand the concern about what they might do if they lost.

Especially when, again, as I keep bringing up and you continue to ignore, the President of the United States is feeding his supporters divisive messaging.

[Spurminator]

"You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” Clinton said. “The racist, sexist, phobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up."

So predictable.

Consider Hillary has that ONE quote where you can credibly call her divisive. Now how many similar quotes can we credit to Trump?

(Also, she wasn't wrong. I don't understand why that quote seems to most annoy the same people who are proud to denounce Muslims, gays and feminists.)

[Reck]

Yeah

"You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” Clinton said. “The racist, sexist, phobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up."

Not like she came up with that out of nowhere, Darrin.

If you need to have the fact that Trump appeals to a certain sub group of people that are basically trash explained to you then you’re just delusional.

[DarrinS]

I don't know, I don't scour Youtubes or get email alerts for violence against Hillary supporters.

You're just going to pretend all of the MAGA mass shooters don't count because they didn't happen outside of a Hillary rally, aren't you? White supremacists are pretty violent winners, I can understand the concern about what they might do if they lost.

Especially when, again, as I keep bringing up and you continue to ignore, the President of the United States is feeding his supporters divisive messaging.

In contrast, the dems are spreading a message of unity. Mmmkay

[Reck]

In contrast, the dems are spreading a message of unity. Mmmkay

So they are spreading hate? Which candidates running for president in the dem side is not trying to be unifying?

[Spurminator]

In contrast, the dems are spreading a message of unity. Mmmkay

By comparison? They're singing kumbaya.

You're really going to "both sides" Donald Trump's rhetoric?

You're worthless.

[DarrinS]

So they are spreading hate? Which candidates running for president in the dem side is not trying to be unifying?

The only one is Biden. Probably why he's so far ahead.

[DarrinS]

By comparison? They're singing kumbaya.

You're really going to "both sides" Donald Trump's rhetoric?

You're worthless.

Ah, the "both sides" mythology lives on

[Spurminator]

Ah, the "both sides" mythology lives on

So does the nonsensical drive-by.

There is no both sides to this. Trump is in a category of his own.

But you apparently think Milquetoast Pete Buttigieg is divisive, so who could expect you to have a clear perspective on this?

[Spurminator]

The only one is Biden. Probably why he's so far ahead.

Rank these names based on who has the most divisive messaging. I dare you.

Trump
Warren
O'Rourke
Buttigieg
Sanders
Harris
Biden

[DarrinS]

Rank these names based on who has the most divisive messaging. I dare you.

Trump
Warren
O'Rourke
Buttigieg
Sanders
Harris
Biden

Polls are already deciding this

[Spurminator]

Polls are already deciding this

That's not an answer. I want you to rank them based on your own individual opinion of who among those names is most divisive.

To be absolutely transparent, I want to see if you have the intellectual independence and conviction to put Donald Trump's name at the top of this list. I don't think you do.

[DarrinS]

That's not an answer. I want you to rank them based on your own individual opinion of who among those names is most divisive.

To be absolutely transparent, I want to see if you have the intellectual independence and conviction to put Donald Trump's name at the top of this list. I don't think you do.

DJT derangement syndrome is extremely divisive. I agree.

[Spurminator]

DJT derangement syndrome is extremely divisive. I agree.

I was right. You can't do it.

What's the syndrome that causes such loyalty to an objectively divisive President that you can't even bring yourself to admit he's more divisive than Beto?

[DarrinS]

I was right. You can't do it.

What's the syndrome that causes such loyalty to an objectively divisive President that you can't even bring yourself to admit he's more divisive than Beto?

Divisiveness is subjective

[Reck]

DJT derangement syndrome is extremely divisive. I agree.

So one most worship at the altar of Trump for you to consider someone as not divisive? That’s very cultish of you.

[Spurminator]

Divisiveness is subjective

Sure. That's why I asked for your opinion.

In MY opinion, you have to have obtuseness bordering on a medical condition to not see that Trump is purposefully polarizing. But it would still be your opinion.

I don't think that's your opinion, I just think (for whatever reason) you see it as some kind of internet L to say anything bad about a Republican President.

That's not obtuse, that's just weak.

[DarrinS]

Sure. That's why I asked for your opinion.

In MY opinion, you have to have obtuseness bordering on a medical condition to not see that Trump is purposefully polarizing.

Before drumpf, we were totally unpolarized.