Reply With Quote
Avenatti has nothing to do with the Russian CULOSION, is not the special sel yet he loves to talk about it.has nothing to do with Daniels or Dennison.
LOS ANGELES (AP) — A federal judge in California ordered a law firm linked to Stormy Daniels' attorney to pay $10 million on Tuesday to a lawyer who claimed that the firm had misstated its profits and that he was owed millions.The judgment came after Jason Frank, who used to work at Eagan Avenatti, alleged that that the law firm failed to pay a $4.85 million settlement he had reached in December. He said in court papers that the settlement was personally guaranteed by Michael Avenatti, who has garnered national attention as the attorney for Daniels, the porn actress who is suing President Donald Trump following an alleged 2006 affair.
Frank had worked at Avenatti's firm under an independent contractor agreement and was supposed to collect 25 percent of the firm's annual profits, along with 20 percent of fees his clients paid, according to court do ents. He resigned in May 2016 after alleging that the firm didn't pay him millions of dollars that he was owed, misstated the firm's profits and wouldn't provide copies of tax returns and other financial do ents.
After he resigned, Frank brought the case to a panel of arbitrators, who found that the firm "acted with malice, fraud, and oppression by hiding its revenue numbers," according to a copy of the arbitration report included in court do ents.
In December, Frank settled with Avenatti's firm for a total of $4.85 million, which was supposed to include an initial $2 million payment and then a second payment for $2.85 million. The $2 million payment was supposed to be made by May 14, but Avenatti and his firm never paid, Frank said in court papers.
The settlement agreement included a clause that the firm couldn't oppose a request for a $10 million judgment if the settlement payments weren't made within three days of the due date. Frank did not immediately return a telephone message seeking comment on Tuesday.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-orders-law-firm-stormy-daniels-lawyer-pay-200044316.html
Avenatti has nothing to do with the Russian CULOSION, is not the special sel yet he loves to talk about it.
thats telling em boo
Avenatti told The Associated Press that he would not discuss "irrelevant nonsense" and wouldn't answer specific questions about the case.
Funny how it switches, he can blabber at will about Cohen but his stuff is ¨private¨.
Does he talk about it? Give a link to it.
Use your lazy ass Chumpy, it wont hurt I promise.
Thass rite!
What about Bill Clinton tho!?!
What about other people?!!?
What about other things other than what we are talking about!?!?
How come no one talks about them?!?!
knew you would fail
Prove Avenatti doesn't love to talk about Russian collusion then. This should be easy.
You liberal loons posted a Trump cartoon ing SD while having the presidential logo, that happened 10 years before the election, unlike your póster boy Bill but hey lets twist facts to fit the agenda.
Google dont be lazy, also it seems you werent following Avenatti, because its the only thing he is talking about.
If you dont Google it never happened?
It's your claim.Google dont be lazy, also it seems you werent following Avenatti, because its the only thing he is talking about.
If you dont Google it never happened?
What about Bill!?!?!
Why wont anyone talk about billy boy!?!?!?!?!?
Listen to Avenatti's bull excuses (lies). More to come.
Law firm of Stormy Daniels' attorney hit with $10-million judgment
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-n...522-story.html
A law firm of Stormy Daniels' attorney Michael Avenatti was hit with a $10-million judgment Tuesday in U.S. Bankruptcy Court after he broke his promise to pay $2 million to a former colleague.
^ The firm is also delinquent on $440,291 in back taxes, penalties and interest that Avenatti promised would be paid last week, Assistant U.S. Atty. Najah Shariff told the bankruptcy judge.
related via Essential Consultants LLC, a hypothesis for the Broidy payoff to Shera Bechard:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer...ot-broidy.htmlLet me offer an alternative explanation of the affair and the payoff. It is still just a hypothesis, but, I would argue, it fits more comfortably with what we know about the various players than the reported version of events:Donald Trump, not Elliott Broidy, had an affair with Shera Bechard. Bechard hired Keith Davidson, who had negotiated both Playboy playmate Karen McDougal’s deal with the National Enquirer and Stormy Daniels’s NDA with Trump. Davidson called Cohen, and the two of them negotiated a $1.6 million payment to Bechard.
At this point Cohen needed to find a funding source. Cohen asserts he took out a home equity loan to come up with a mere $130,000 to pay off Stormy Daniels, so it seems clear he couldn’t have fronted the $1.6 million for the Bechard deal himself. So Cohen reached out to Elliott Broidy, a very rich Republican fundraiser with several pending and highly lucrative business deals with foreign governments: deals that hinged on whether Broidy could convince the U.S. government to take various actions. By stepping up to take responsibility for the affair and to fund the seven-figure settlement, Broidy was ensuring that he could continue to peddle his influence with Trump to governments around the world.
Which is to say, it was a cover-up concealing a bribe. Indeed, it turns out that Broidy not only has a history of bribing public officials, but of bribing them in an uncannily similar fashion to the method which I hypothesize he employed in this case.
So, according to this hypothesis, when Cohen’s office was raided by federal prosecutors, they found do entation of what was actually a fabricated affair, concocted by Cohen and Davidson to create a justification for funneling Broidy’s money to Bechard, while creating a paper record designed to protect Trump from further exposure.
This account — as bizarre as it may seem at first glance — is actually more plausible than the story leaked to the Journal, the New York Times, and CNN.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/05/more-evidence-that-broidy-was-covering-for-trump-in-affair.htmlThe first payment from Broidy came two days before the meeting that apparently helped him ink a nine-figure deal with a foreign country — a deal based in no small part on his access to, and influence on, Trump. If it’s difficult to imagine Broidy being willing to take the fall for Trump’s affair with Bechard and then paying her a seven-figure sum, it’s much simpler to imagine it simply as a perfectly timed and fantastically profitable bribe.
It’s also important to keep in mindthat the only hard evidence for Broidy’s claim that his payoff to Bechard wasn’t actually a straight-up bribe of the president of the United States continues to be Broidy’s own assertions.
we like the swamp now.
it's not a swamp! it's a lavish water park for the best people!
tv links are hard 175 interviews in 10 weeks hard to upload all on youtube
Certainly too hard for any of you to link one.
Because is not agenda friendly, he was ing an intern while he was the POTUS, there was a presidential logo there, duh.
There's a storm coming:
Is there really any difference between Harvey and David Dennison?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
