i was wrong about pizzagate

**Spurtacular** · 03-06-2018

You have issues, dude.

You're a gy temperamental bag that never grew up properly and acts out everytime you get set straight. Chucho corrected you, as did Spurraider, RandomGuy and Fuzzy and you're still refusing to accept it 3 days later.

Not only was he right about you using the word in the wrong context, but he also is right that you use words wrong pretty much on a daily basis.

Either work on your wording or make peace with your lack of education and continue being a bleeding insecure vagina.

Tranny looking for any reason to pile on. Doesn't matter if her es are wrong as .

Tranny gonna tranny, though.

**Reck** · 03-06-2018

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

"blank statement"

You're not trying to do other than be your head self. He wanted me to show something that didn't needed no showing (the Clintons/Podestas are OBVIOUSLY connected). It was pedantic to a ing tee, cunnnt.

Nothing to do with an inferior complex; and if you're gonna continue to be a re , then I may just develop a superiority complex when it comes to you.

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

You need to go look up the word. You obviously don't understand the various applications of the word. Ironic that you tried to call me out and only made yourself look like a total ing idiot.

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Tranny looking for any reason to pile on. Doesn't matter if her es are wrong as .

Tranny gonna tranny, though.

Very stable genius.

Is your life this miserable and sad that you get home and immediately go on angry rants online? You're such a failure in life.

**Spurtacular** · 03-06-2018

Originally Posted by Reck

Very stable genius.

Is your life this miserable and sad that you get home and immediately go on angry rants online? You're such a failure in life.

Well, if the chumpettes didn't gimp gang attack...

Today's tranny and her lame points.

**Chucho** · 03-07-2018

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

"blank statement"

You're not trying to do other than be your head self. He wanted me to show something that didn't needed no showing (the Clintons/Podestas are OBVIOUSLY connected). It was pedantic to a ing tee, cunnnt.

Nothing to do with an inferior complex; and if you're gonna continue to be a re , then I may just develop a superiority complex when it comes to you.

You're not superior in any way. You don't know how to use "pedantic" properly. You're not as smart as you think you are and you hate being told thus and rage. That is the epitome of an inferiority complex.

**Spurtacular** · 03-07-2018

Originally Posted by Chucho

You're not superior in any way. You don't know how to use "pedantic" properly. You're not as smart as you think you are and you hate being told thus and rage. That is the epitome of an inferiority complex.

I'll walk you through your re ation. Why did SR ask me to list the Podesta/Clinton cohorts? What was I to possibly prove that wasn't understood?

**Chucho** · 03-07-2018

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Well, if the chumpettes didn't gimp gang attack...

Today's tranny and her lame points.

LOL, you have that same thought process of Fabbs- you think everyone who tells you what's what is in a clique or are conspiring to gang up on you.

"Chumpettes" = Laundry Krew.

Do you ever think that maybe, just maybe, it might be you?

**Chucho** · 03-07-2018

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

I'll walk you through your re ation. Why did SR ask me to list the Podesta/Clinton cohorts? What was I to possibly prove that wasn't understood?

This is why you're an idiot. You say "major names" and make a giant accusation. People ask you to name major names, which in theory shouldn't be a difficult chore whatsoever and you go bat and still refuse. You sir, are ing stupid and don't know how to use "pedantic" properly.

**Spurtacular** · 03-07-2018

Originally Posted by Chucho

LOL, you have that same thought process of Fabbs- you think everyone who tells you what's what is in a clique or are conspiring to gang up on you.

"Chumpettes" = Laundry Krew.

Do you ever think that maybe, just maybe, it might be you?

Nice aspersion, brah. You've consistently failed to answer direct questions.

**Chucho** · 03-07-2018

Originally Posted by Spurtacular

Nice aspersion, brah. You've consistently failed to answer direct questions.

Kinda like "what major names?", huh?

**Spurtacular** · 03-07-2018

Originally Posted by Chucho

This is why you're an idiot. You say "major names" and make a giant accusation. People ask you to name major names, which in theory shouldn't be a difficult chore whatsoever and you go bat and still refuse. You sir, are ing stupid and don't know how to use "pedantic" properly.

Are you a ing re ? Serious question. Do you not understand that the most recent president to be and her campaign manager was not very connected to the people in her party? Of course it's ing pedantic to name names to prove something that is understood by anybody with a ing ounce of common sense. And yea I get that the chumpettes are too ing moronic to think this out when their math is 'four posts against one, we must be right.' But what's your ing excuse? You're much sadder than them, cos your sh** comes down to just being a stupid jaded cunnt all your own.