No need for more discussion then. You hate kids.
"Snowflake thinking" is literally the foundation of your gun control "logic". You have to believe that your country is so unique that history would never possibly repeat. It's only way to push idiotic policy on a handful of deaths.
No need for more discussion then. You hate kids.
On Nov. 11, 1938, the German minister of the interior issued "Regulations Against Jews Possession of Weapons." Not only were Jews forbidden to own guns and ammunition, they couldn’t own "truncheons or stabbing weapons."
They said we could save 17 lives if we gave up our guns.
Do you think that could happen here?
He's going to fight the army guerrilla style because it worked in Syria.
It could happen in any country. Did human nature to seek power change recently?
Guerilla warfare has been proven effective throughout history.
So you have think the following for gun control:
1. History couldn't possibly repeat.
2. Ignore that guerilla warfare has been effective throughout history.
So you think we could actually get to a point of forbidding Jews to have guns here.
Ok.
Indeed. Syria is a shining example.
Yes, along with everyone else who isn't a Jew.
Some people think the government is too powerful now for guerilla tactics to be useful. They follow that to the logical conclusion that the people should be weaker and more vulnerable to that government.
Ok kook
Yeah, "crazy". You people are so warped that idea of a ever needing a gun vs a powerful enemy is beyond imagination. If that's narrative being pushed on the masses then that takes the core foundational need for guns away.
Are you re ed?
Convince me otherwise. Tell me how you're going to beat the armed forces of the US government.
probably won't stand a chance but rather die trying if it came to it.
Do you currently posses an anti-government arsenal?
Walk me through the process in which you would decide to take up arms against the government of the United States.
currently, no. i have shot guns and thoroughly enjoy doing so even though i was strongly against them up until about 27 yrs old.
both of us have yet to endure such an event and hopefully we never have to. therefore i have no idea how to answer such a question but having a gun is a step up in my opinion.
plenty of my friends and family are licensed gun owners who have never shot up a school nor anyone for that matter. but we're scared of the guns and not the source of what makes these psychos snap.
I'm scared that psychos can get guns like AR-15s so easily tbh.
yeah, i'm not into that either man. not familiar with guns and calibers to be honest. all i know is that a 50 cal is too much for me, an AK is fun, but a 9mm seems to be about right.
I may have too much faith in the armed forces but dont think they would ever honor an order to fire on civilians.
Convince me on how becoming weaker is advantageous when combating a powerful opponent.
Also I've already mentioned a key component of my strategy. Also I mentioned the fact that guerilla warfare has been effective on countless occasions through history.
Government=Warriors
Armed citizens=Spurs
Unarmed citizens=dleague team(your preference )
You have too much faith in the armed forces. All it takes is a little propaganda and civilians become an enemy.
Yeah, I'm asking for specifics on how you're going to beat the armed forces of the US.
All you've said so far is "you know, guerrilla stuff."
I have a quote in one of my comments some specifics. You don't need to specifics to understand that we would be better off with guns than without them. Guerrilla warfare has been proven effective countless times.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)