Reply With Quote
Define assault weapon or else you'll feel the wrath of the ar-15 forum
I own a firearm, and I do not see anything wrong with these reforms that students and people would like to see.
- Ban assault weapons
- Require universal background checks before gun sales
- Pass a gun violence restraining order law that would allow courts to disarm people who display warning signs of violent behavior
I see nothing wrong with this. What are your thoughts?
Define assault weapon or else you'll feel the wrath of the ar-15 forum
So ban semiautomatic rifles? I don't see that flying at all. Not even Obama would have bothered with legislation that ridiculous much less Trump doing it.
High capacity semi auto rifle that fires .223, 5.56, or 7.62 rounds. That's my definition. Who needs this for self protection besides the zombie apocalypse happening? These guns should be in the hands of law enforcement or the military. I dont want to hear this is for hunting either. They make plenty of rifles designed strictly for hunting. Unless you are hunting large groups of people, the AR is really unnecessary for the general public.
That's too narrow of a definition. If you limit it to specific calibers they'll just create new ones to get around it.
That was just an example of what I consider an assault rifle. I say ban any caliber that fits the criteria. I cant get into specifics, the government/state will have to define that.
If gun regulations don't address the 300M+ guns already in USA, they're useless, totally ineffective.
Since oligarchy's SCOTUS shills detached "gun" from "militia", aka ACTIVIST/REVISIONIST so-called "judging" that so-called conservatives/Repugs are supposed to hate,
America is ed and un able.
I don't own any firearms, but I don't agree with banning semi-auto assault rifles. Just because others can't see a need to own something doesn't mean we should ban them.
Stricter background checks including review of prescribed medications (opiods)
Increased age limits on semi-automatics
Better entrance security for schools (walls/fences creating single entry point)
I can live with that...
Uh yeah, when a particular something is used to murder people over and over, you're gonna have to explain your need to own that something
Don't blame the tool...blame the murderer. People can just as easily be killed via: cars, trucks, knives, homemade bombs, hammers, axes, etc.
More people die from knives each year than from AR-15s/rifles: https://www.statista.com/statistics/...y-weapon-used/
Having a gun at home in your nightstand to protect your family is one thing. Owning an AR is a different story. Who are you fighting off? The taliban?
This may be true, but Ive never seen 50 people killed at one time by one person using a knife.
"nightstand" a really secure place that kids will never find
Haha...you've never seen Red Dawn! You never know with these russians...
tylenol.
Or a hammer
Who said I had kids. People with kids need to teach their kids about firearms and/or keep the firearm in a safe.
Uh ok. Is that what you take after one of your patented message board rants gives you a headache?
As long as there are bad guys, people need to protect themselves. But, there is a limit as to what you need. A rocket launcher might be overkill.
anything to turn the corner, right blake? don't want to address the murders at the hand of tylenol? yeah, didn't think so because your narrative/agenda falls flat.
Agreed. They should hide it in your mom's belly rolls.
I would ask wtf you're talking about but frankly I don't care what your dumb ass is ranting about here
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
