Liberals Bring Rocks To A Gun Fight

[Spurtacular]

DMC never has an actual take on the topic.

Still beats kids should battle gunfighters with rocks by a mile.

[Pavlov]

Still beats kids should battle gunfighters with rocks by a mile.

You don't have a take either. You just run away from direct questions about the topic you brought up.

[Spurtacular]

You don't have a take either. You just run away from direct questions about the topic you brought up.

I'm on the don't bring rocks to a gunfight side of the argument, skippy.

[Chris]

I'm on the don't bring rocks to a gunfight side of the argument, skippy.

[Pavlov]

I'm on the don't bring rocks to a gunfight side of the argument, skippy.

Did you want the kids to have guns?

Yes or no.

[Spurtacular]

Did you want the kids to have guns?

Yes or no.

There are comprehensive solutions. My bar is not rocks vs. guns like yours.

[Pavlov]

There are comprehensive solutions. My bar is not rocks vs. guns like yours.

What is your comprehensive solution?

You want the kids to have nothing but clear backpacks to throw?

[Mikeanaro]

Vintage Chump: A question somehow is supposed to override glaring realities.

[Expert]

DMC never has an actual take on the topic.

If you had a 10 year old child in a classroom and an active shooter was approaching the room, and you as a remote observer could only make a choice between two things, arm the child or don't arm the child, which would you choose?

Keep in mind you cannot intervene, just like IRL you won't be there. Does that mean we should arm kids? No. It does get to the heart of the matter though - the fact that when that moment comes it's just the kid facing down a firearm and anything and everything safety related goes straight to . So it would be nice if someone in the vicinity had the ability to intervene, wouldn't it?

There is no real "safe space", as we've been shown countless times. Hate to break it to you, snowflake.

For that reason, rocks are better than nothing, but the idea of the rocks isn't to defend themselves, but to give them confidence that they can (they cannot) and to send a message that they won't die without a fight (they will).

[Pavlov]

If you had a 10 year old child in a classroom and an active shooter was approaching the room, and you as a remote observer could only make a choice between two things, arm the child or don't arm the child, which would you choose?

Keep in mind you cannot intervene, just like IRL you won't be there. Does that mean we should arm kids? No. It does get to the heart of the matter though - the fact that when that moment comes it's just the kid facing down a firearm and anything and everything safety related goes straight to . So it would be nice if someone in the vicinity had the ability to intervene, wouldn't it?

There is no real "safe space", as we've been shown countless times. Hate to break it to you, snowflake.

For that reason, rocks are better than nothing, but the idea of the rocks isn't to defend themselves, but to give them confidence that they can (they cannot) and to send a message that they won't die without a fight (they will).

No wonder you never actually present a take. You're much better at trying to collect the personal information of other posters.

[Spurminator]

If you had a 10 year old child in a classroom and an active shooter was approaching the room, and you as a remote observer could only make a choice between two things, arm the child or don't arm the child, which would you choose?

Keep in mind you cannot intervene, just like IRL you won't be there. Does that mean we should arm kids? No. It does get to the heart of the matter though - the fact that when that moment comes it's just the kid facing down a firearm and anything and everything safety related goes straight to . So it would be nice if someone in the vicinity had the ability to intervene, wouldn't it?

There is no real "safe space", as we've been shown countless times. Hate to break it to you, snowflake.

For that reason, rocks are better than nothing, but the idea of the rocks isn't to defend themselves, but to give them confidence that they can (they cannot) and to send a message that they won't die without a fight (they will).

So in other words it's kind of a microcosm for grown men loading up on AR's to protect themselves against government intervention.

[pgardn]

So in other words it's kind of a microcosm for grown men loading up on AR's to protect themselves against government intervention.

Because the personal self defense thing is not working for some weapons.

What personal situation, for the no restriction inididuals in this country, has best illustrated the need for protection against our government's ability to take your country from you? Anecdotes are fine. Go.

[Spurminator]

Because the personal self defense thing is not working for some weapons.

What personal situation, for the no restriction inididuals in this country, has best illustrated the need for protection against our government's ability to take your country from you? Anecdotes are fine. Go.

*Woosh*

[pgardn]

*Woosh*

I want insight into phobias.
I want "there is a unit of marines under my bed" stuff.

And further, I may not want to be a part of their personal piece of Colorado if I have land in the new country staked out.

[Expert]

So in other words it's kind of a microcosm for grown men loading up on AR's to protect themselves against government intervention.

Grown men and women (and the rest of you).

You seem ok with one, not ok with the other. A knife vs a grizzly is a futile endeavor, but it beats bare hands vs the grizzly. Either way, the grizzly is coming.

[Expert]

No wonder you never actually present a take. You're much better at trying to collect the personal information of other posters.

You're not qualified to debate me.

[Pavlov]

You're not qualified to debate me.

You never debate anybody, chicken .

[Expert]

You never debate anybody, chicken .

You're not qualified to debate me.

[Pavlov]

You're too chicken to debate anyone, which is why you don't debate anyone.

[Spurminator]

Grown men and women (and the rest of you).

You seem ok with one, not ok with the other. A knife vs a grizzly is a futile endeavor, but it beats bare hands vs the grizzly. Either way, the grizzly is coming.

Actually, the grizzly probably isn't coming. Especially not in the way these GI Joe Militia clubs fantasize that it will.

If it came, how it would really come, they'd never even have a chance to shoot. Bare hands, knives, guns, it won't matter. In all likelihood, they'll be along for the ride in full support.

[Spurtacular]

You're too chicken to debate anyone, which is why you don't debate anyone.

You never debate either. Where's your stance on why kids having rocks is the best idea? You haven't listed it, "chicken ".

[Expert]

Actually, the grizzly probably isn't coming. Especially not in the way these GI Joe Militia clubs fantasize that it will.

If it came, how it would really come, they'd never even have a chance to shoot. Bare hands, knives, guns, it won't matter. In all likelihood, they'll be along for the ride in full support.

Tell the kids in that Florida school that the shooter wasn't real. The grizzly doesn't need to be the federal government. Your strawman regarding fighting the government is just a fart in the wind.

If it "won't matter" why do you care if they try?

[Expert]

You're too chicken to debate anyone, which is why you don't debate anyone.

Chump's Dale Robinson impression ^

[sickdsm]

You're too chicken to debate anyone, which is why you don't debate anyone.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Insists on asking questions than refuses to directly answer others had been your go to move for years.......

[koriwhat]

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Insists on asking questions than refuses to directly answer others had been your go to move for years.......