Reply With Quote
Hannity needs very little work just a couple of questions answeredand he chose a fixer who does barely any legal work
He did go to law school unlike you
When did Cohen get sentenced in a crime
Until that time no one has the right to know who his clients on
Public might want to know but they have no right
Hannity needs very little work just a couple of questions answeredand he chose a fixer who does barely any legal work
He did go to law school unlike you
That was the whole point
think about how funny this is
Yeah but you enjoy peeing on teenage girls, so maybe your legal expertise can go eat .
pussy ass Darrin knows what he was implying here and chose to hide from it.
It's like I said the other day. Everyone who has to hear a case on Trump must be excluded because x.
now if a lawyer makes an argument and a judge agrees, it's collusion?
if Judge Wood agreed to have the name revealed under seal, would that mean she would have colluded with Cohen's attorney?
"Traditional Family Values"
who cares whether or not hannity was a client of cohen's? i still am baffled as to why it matters.
Hannity sure as cared whether it was known.
and why shouldn't he? it doesn't bug you that that judge killed client/atty privilege? destory the country right? i forgot that's what you're in to.
I don't believe simply knowing an attorney/client relationship exists is a violation of any privilege.
You can correct me if I'm wrong.
Trigger Warning for Blake
big-timing below
read at your own discretion
attorney client privilege protects confidential communications between the attorney and client
maybe it's not but why is it anyone's business to know in the first place and second, why is it so "shocking" hannity was a client or not? the media and everyone is making it out to be semi-illegal activity for hannity to be a client of cohen which is odd.
Considering the armada of attorneys available to Hannity personally and through Fox and ulus, it's certainly worth an eyebrow raise.
why though? is hannity not allowed to seek his own counsel? just asking because i am perplexed by the outrage of all of this bs.
what is shocking is that dude is covering the Cohen / Trump story for Fox News without mentionning his personnal relations with Cohen
Cohen not sticking to his guns all of a sudden...
Trump lawyer drops libel suits against Fusion GPS, BuzzFeed
http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...n-gps-buzzfeed
Strawman. Of course he is -- but there is no compelling reason to keep that relationship secret in federal court proceedings.
Who's outraged?just asking because i am perplexed by the outrage of all of this bs.
Most people are laughing because of the legal work for which Cohen is now famous.
Who are you trying to big time here?
Public has every right to know what he President's personal lawyer is doing.
It is giggle-inducing, more than outrage.
It is outrage, because Hannity had Cohen on his show no fewer than 16 times, and spends whole shows railing against what happened to Cohen, without disclosing his conflict of interest.
One might not expect much from the state media at this point, but this is ed even so.
The funny part is that Cohen's work tends to either bend, or actively break the law. What ever he was advising Hannity on has a good chance of being actively illegal, meaning that Hannity himself could be the target of a criminal probe.
Made especially easy, because it appears as though Cohen was never formally an attorney for Hannity, so there is NO filter AT ALL to keep whatever was done from the hands of really competent prosecutors.
Man, you know you're done for when your own lawyer says he expects Cohen to be indicted within the next 90 days. LOL
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
