They still need to verify they were from Iranian Military positions.
Israel will ask for blood as this was into the Israeli part of the Golan Heights. The Russians will know this.
Hater gotta have an American clue him in how deeply involved Iranian backed ground troops and such are in Syria. Dude actually believes they fight for the Syrian people. Hater took schrapnel to the head his year as a Latin King.
They still need to verify they were from Iranian Military positions.
Israel will ask for blood as this was into the Israeli part of the Golan Heights. The Russians will know this.
Whatever it is, it can't be any worse than the liberal solution of "well, just let Iran have their nukes." The Obama deal was horrible, numb nuts. It was pretty ing stupid.
What was stupid about it?
In your own words....
How about you tell us in your own words.....
It's your claim; back it up.
Just say you were talking out of your ass again.
It's reality.
Watch even the first ten minutes of the Trump speech and tell me how the many points are wrong.
And yea, I am talking to an ass again; so, you'll forgive me if I don't care about your demands.
You can't back explain it in your own words.
Ask Trump
Don't be lazy. If you want to have this convo, then refute the source. Tell me what was wrong with the Trump speech. You can't/won't, so I look forward to your white flag and/or obliteration.
What nation is the number one sponsor of terrorism? Anyone?
I asked you to explain it in your own words and you lazily rolled over and cried.
The EU and Britain are going to ignore US sanctions on Iran and keep trading like the deal was in place.
You don’t like globalism, so see how it works out if only US customers buy US goods. You got any stock? Get out if you don’t like globalization. This is just a spectacularly stupid move much like the beauty of Trumps plan on health care.
We will back down. We may leave the deal, but we are still gonna trade with a huge market outside of our own.
The Koreans watch the Iranians build missles and nukes unfettered and think, wtf...
Looking really good. We could lose/lose.
There is no plan for a win/win so Trump is gonna have to try and sell steaks just like health care.
Zero planning.
Tell us what was stupid about the Obama Iran nuke deal. You ran from a very simple request. But now you're the victim. Par.
That wasn't my claim.
It was yours.
And you ran from explaining it in your own words and are still crying about it.
lol
Always crying about the your claim stuff instead of just making a case. Sad.
It's certainly not giving Iran everything they want and getting nothing in return.
Iran wanted nuclear weapons to destroy Israel and, like NK has done, keep USA from ing with Iran. The Obama deal denied Iran nuclear weapons.
That Time John Bolton Promised Regime Change In Iran Before 2019
In July of last year neoconservative death cultist John Bolton, now the National Security Advisor of the United States, gave a speech at the Grand Gathering of Iranians for Free Iran in which
he openly called for regime change in Tehran.
Bolton, who is so stupid, crazy and evil that he remains one of the only high-profile individuals on this planet who still insists that the Iraq invasion was a great idea,
spoke about the need to prevent the Iranian government from achieving “an arc of control” through Iraq, Syria and Lebanon.
He decried the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA),
claiming that Iran was still a nuclear threat under the existing agreement, and
spoke glowingly of aggressive sanctions against Tehran.
He concluded his speech with the following statement:
“There is a viable opposition to the rule of the ayatollahs,
and that opposition is centered in this room today.
I had said for over 10 years since coming to these events,
that the declared policy of the United States of America should be the overthrow of the mullahs’ regime in Tehran.
The behavior and the objectives of the regime are not going to change, and
therefore the only solution is to change the regime itself.
And that’s why, before 2019, we here will celebrate in Tehran!”
https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/t...9-fa9be9dd2e5d
"nother level"
AaronY
USA, Saudi are possibly tid for #1
I would guess Saudi too, but the attribution is more or less subjective: how does one measure "terrorism" on a worldwide basis and determine which "sponsors" get credit?
Its pretty easy imo
If you either fund, train, arm, move or help a terrorist in any way to perform their act or hide its perpetrators you are a sponsor
who counts is more or less politically defined: any group a government -- any government -- doesn't like, can be designated as a terrorist organization.
Sure governments have their labels
But if we apply the common definition of terrorism we can very effectively conclude whats terrorism and whats not
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)