I don't think this article says what you think it says.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/21/polit...rge/index.html
t Manafort dropped Monday initially asked the court to throw out one charge -- alleging he failed to disclose to the Treasury Department foreign bank accounts worth more than $10,000 in 2011 -- because its five-year statute of limitations expired.
Proof it is a witch hunt
Trying to hard and then said my bad I made a bad mistake
I don't think this article says what you think it says.
ducks
Yeah, this one's a win for the good guys, meaning Mueller's team.
They caught Manafort's lawyers a little flat footed, but it's clear they never disclose anything unless they have to.
#StillWithHer
Mueller was the one who was flatfooted when he asked for more time once he realized the Russians were going to challenge his ham sandwich theory.
she has nothing to do with Manafort's trial but thanks for letting everyone know she's living rent free in your head.
still playing both sides of every issue
Could you point me to an actual ruling on that issue, Chris?
you have no idea what he's even talking about.
It's all about her and everything she "stood for". Paying all these millions for a witch hunt because you can't stand that your hag lost and you're desperately searching for excuses.
She doesn't stand for Manafort's trial.
Show me that link.
What are you babbling about now?
"Can't back up your claim"
And a babbling retort for four words.
What link are you demanding?
I demand nothing. that you cannot live up to the standard that you've thrown many a tantrums over, though.
What link are you demanding?
Use your words.
Show us how Hillary doesn't stand for Manafort's trial. That's a rather bold claim.
Demanding I prove a negative about your failed attempt at symbolism?
You claimed that Hillary does not stand for Manafort's trial. So, you're saying you have nothing to based that on. Got it.
You're the only person in the world who has tried to link the two.
Burden is on you.
lol
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)