You were throwing out anything you could to try and get an answer; now you're crying. Par.I knew you were never going to answer the first time you your pants.
Now I just make you your pants for fun.
Works every time.
Every time.
lol
Talking circles around your statement won't unmake it. You've classified yourself as a Hillary sperm shielder.
Now I just make you your pants for fun.
Works every time.
Every time.
lol
Talking circles around your statement won't unmake it. You've classified yourself as a Hillary sperm shielder.I can't make you understand simple mocking.
You're just too stupid.
You also your pants.
Again.
At my command.
lol
Butt posting won't unmake the statement either.
You're just too stupid.
You also your pants.
Again.
At my command.
lol
Butt posting won't unmake the statement either.
You still your pants.
You can't un them.
lol
Cheap come-ons won't unmake the statement either.
You still your pants.
You can't un them.
lol
Watched this the last few days. Made it through the first 8 episodes. Better than making a murderer imo. It was far more objective than MAM. MAM left out a ton of evidence that made that look guilty.
super interesting
I haven't watched it the last few days; but it is good to have on in the background. Props to SpursforSix
Such as?
Feel free to look it up. A quick google search will net you the results you want.
I thought he was possibly innocent after watching the doc, did my own research afterwards and there was a lot of they left out that made him look very guilty.
This should be helpful
https://onmilwaukee.com/movies/artic...instavery.html
No wonder you’re always coming off as misinformed on pretty much every subject here.
Most of what’s on that list can be planted. Specially the DNA since the police already had access to his. Either way, this case was mishandled and there is plenty of reasonable doubt. Not a clear or clean cut case, imo.
What are you tranny menstruating about?
I haven't watched it in four years or something, so I'm not that eager to go searching; figured you might have something brewing you wanted to put out there.
Who puts TV shows or movies they haven't seen on as background noise? Usually you do that when you have seen something and just want to have it on while you do something else---like in your case whack off to tranny porn.
Wow, you challenge the stupidest . Did I say background noise, or is that your term? In any event, I was able to catch the gist of the episodes while doing other stuff. Apparently, you need to cuddle up in a blanky with a tub of popcorn though. That's fine cos your tranny brain is not that adept.
Looks to me you do not know--or are completely confusing the term----yet again.Wow, you challenge the stupidest . Did I say background noise, or is that your term? In any event, I was able to catch the gist of the episodes while doing other stuff. Apparently, you need to cuddle up in a blanky with a tub of popcorn though. That's fine cos your tranny brain is not that adept.
I'm not surprise and I'm not going to bother to explain what having a show or movie "in the background" means to you.
Amuse me and tell me what having a show on in the bacground means to me. (I type as 'The Staircase' plays in the background )
Ehh there is a few things that are pretty damning on that list imo. Specifically asking for the photographer, the missed calls from him, then add that to the DNA evidence. I think its tough to see him as not guilty tbh.
With that said the case was definitely mishandled. The police offers who handled it were definitely crooked. I feel like they had a much better case built against him though than the case built against the guy from the Staircase imo.
What’s ed up about the Staircase...or I guess the system, is that most normal people would have been convicted. For most of the show, I couldn’t get away from how much Peterson’s defense must have cost. I remember early on, he and his brother were talking about it being $750,000 instead of $500,000. And iirc, that was well before the first trial.
Also...check out the Owl Theory on the web. I heard a podcast about it. Pretty interesting that they found feathers in her hand and wood in her hair.
Yea, the director of the seires wanted to show that even with money its tough to fight the system.
To your point as well there is a point where Peterson says "what do people who don't have money do". Basically talks about how he is fortunate enough to be able to afford a great defense team, but its easy as for the system to pick apart people who can't afford a good lawyer.
I checked it out, it isn't the most outlandish theory I have ever heard, but idk. Seems a bit farfetched tbh.
I agree and they were right not to bring it up. I would have been like wtf. But the fact that owl attacks are fairly well do ented gives it some plausibility. But have no idea how it would have been in the house.
The blowpoke turninh up was weird.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote