I’ll go so far as to say that having some of these people into the country is actually a good thing, but we should have the right to know who’s coming in and reject bad ombrés.
I’ll go so far as to say that having some of these people into the country is actually a good thing, but we should have the right to know who’s coming in and reject bad ombrés.
Trump separated 2000 children from their parents in three months.
I wanted that stopped.
He stopped.
Victory.
That's a regurgitated talking point.
Who says we shouldn't have the right to do so, Darrin?
Yea, we all know you're such the humanitarian.
you wanted the policy to go on forever.
Until Trump ate .
Now you want to eat it too.
I am 100% supportive of Dems immigrants first platform. A winning strategy, tbh.
What is their immigration platform?
What is Trump's?
Explain them, Darrin.
Whoa massive concession
True if huge
calling Democrats hypocrites is usually an easy sell, but really, there's an open borders plan out there?
got a link to that?
https://reason.com/blog/2018/06/20/t...l-silliness-ofTo say that there was "no outrage" about Obama's detention facilities is to tacitly admit that looking up news articles published in 2014 is just too heavy a lift. The opportunistic-outrage charge gets levied at Reason every time we write about the Trump administration's immigration enforcement policies. "Children in cages in 2014 was okay because Obama," one self-described "Classical Liberal" recently tweeted at us.
Yeah, no.
You want Avante to rub on you
Guess not.
Can't argue policy? Invent an exaggerated version of the policy and argue that. No intelligence required.
Marches to the tune his media masters play, no own takes or intelligence required.
the first time Darrin tries to have a take, Dennison takes a wet on him.
On him and all the goose steppers crying "too bad illegal is illegal" etc
Well they just need to convert all the Jade Helm FEMA camps to asylum seeker concentration camps.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)