Reply With Quote
CNN headline "Orange criticizes Obama instead of Russia for hacking"
You can't make this up.
having things both ways is part of the beauty of being a reflexive toady. you can say whatever you want without worrying about consistency because your only consistency is loyalty to faction or leader.
CNN headline "Orange criticizes Obama instead of Russia for hacking"
You can't make this up.
I didn't really mean it
How was it not a metaphor, Chris?
Explain.
What was he referring to specifically Pavlov?
How was it not a metaphor, Chris?
Explain.
A metaphor.
White flag accepted.
No. I answered your question.
The Purple Heart reference was always a metaphor.
I asked you how it was somehow something else and you never answered.
I accept your white flag.
What is the definition of a metaphor Pavlov? After you figure that out, tell what he was referring to specifically. Thanks.
noun
a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.
Now explain how it's anything but a metaphor, Chris.
Not my job to explain your alleged point for you.
I accept your white flag.
Your claim was that it was a metaphor and you failed to explain why.
Easy win for team Chris
Because he wasn't literally suggesting anything.
How could you be this ignorant?
he definitely fooled me then... this guy and many others on the wrong side of history were, like i said yesterday, strzok's fluffers.
cohen not only meant what you said but he fluffed strzok for like 20 secs. as did many others which was embarrassing when you're there on part of the US people and you'd rather cheer on strzok than ask serious questions. as well, the fluffing was ridiculous but so was the bringing up issues that don't pertain to this hearing because of trump derangement syndrome. TDS indeed exists; it's alive and well in the hearts and minds of the democratic party no doubt.
this testimony was worthless except for a few gems here and there. the last of which was the closing statement by the chairman. strzok kept deflecting and referring to the gag the fbi has put on his testimony to answer some serious questions.
strzok, like those here who exhibit his same behavior, is an egotistical maniac who feels shielded from any repercussions he would/might endure otherwise. he believes he is untouchable by his words and actions as he shimmy's about with his weasel face and sly smirk. so sickening to think there's more like him, most likely, in the agency who have taken the oath but have no ethics or loyalty.
until next time...
He didn't expect the veteran backlash and they never forget. He ed up and now he's backtracking with the metaphor .
so, how much of that 10 hr testimony did you watch? it's really like 8 hrs but i doubt you even watched anything more than a mere clip here and there in this thread or on twitter.
what ya say pav? the man of many questions but no answers.
You completely failed today. I'm disappointed tbh.
did you watch the whole damn thing or just a clip of this particular congressman's time? if you put all the dems fluffing together you can clearly tell they were all on the same page in praising strzok and none of which were bull ting about it either. i believe cohen to be a complete and utter liar.
I didn't watch much of it since I knew it was a waste of time. These hearings usually are.
I'll ask you what I already asked you and all the other Dennisonistas:
How did his bias affect the investigations?
I know what the summit is about.
Everyone does.
Everyone except you.
lol Chris
he doesn't want to be wrong just like he didn't want hrc to lose. it's all relative to all their TDS and now it all makes sense. it's all about force feeding the masses the lie that trump is out to kill everyone but the rich white demographic. pavTHETIC will argue til he's blue in the face even over he knows he's wrong about. cliche.
What am I wrong about here, kori?
He's easy pickins'
i could easily answer this question because i did watch the whole damn testimony over a span of 2 days. you'd get your answer too if you as amendment about seeking the truth as you are with your merry-go-round schtick. the answer's in the testimony and it's not my job to provide it to you. good luck pavTHETIC!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
