Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Member of Wembyland CorrectCrusader's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Post Count
    1,485



    This video made me think a lot about the big 3 spurs and how ahead of the game they were.
    Manu Ginobili was a 2 guard but had the skills of a point guard, he could score, pass, and handle the ball.

    The big 3 really were ahead of their time skillset wise. A point guard who scored, a 2guard who did it all, and the greatest power forward of all time who could pass.

  2. #2
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    96,293
    duncan would just be a center in today's NBA. even younger, more athletic duncan would have just been a center. never was a good enough shooter to provide the spacing modern 4's have to. for his career he was about a 40% shooter from anything outside of 10 feet

  3. #3
    Veteran tbdog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    4,681
    This would cause a stir. But David Robinson in this era would be the most dominant player in the league, more so than Duncan. He would be Giannis with a midrange shot that probably would have a three point shot, while being a even better defender.

  4. #4
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    96,293
    while tracking data on this only goes back to 96-97, from then on, robinson shot 38% on shots from 10-16 feet and 41.5% on shots from 16 feet to the 3pt line, so not much better than duncan. and being a worse post player than duncan, robinsons fg% from 3-10 feet was only 36%

    again, this only goes back fo 96-97, so after robinson's prime

  5. #5
    Veteran tbdog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    4,681
    while tracking data on this only goes back to 96-97, from then on, robinson shot 38% on shots from 10-16 feet and 41.5% on shots from 16 feet to the 3pt line, so not much better than duncan. and being a worse post player than duncan, robinsons fg% from 3-10 feet was only 36%

    again, this only goes back fo 96-97, so after robinson's prime
    Robinson jumper was money though. So interesting stats. I wonder what Mcdyse was, considering he had a money jumper to.

  6. #6
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    44,886
    This would cause a stir. But David Robinson in this era would be the most dominant player in the league, more so than Duncan. He would be Giannis with a midrange shot that probably would have a three point shot, while being a even better defender.
    You want an even bigger stir? Manu would be the #1 option on offense over both Duncan and Robinson.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •