Activity Stream

Agreed. I feel like I have to add caveats all the time so here it is: I would still be fine with SA drafting Castle. But I really have more concerns than most it seems with him. Theres a lot of bust potential here, more than meets the eye. His upside is still there so that’s good and its not like I...

Sometimes, the POA defender takes it in the shorts on Drtg. Bruce Bowen was tied for 10th on the 2002-2003 championship squad, yet still made the All D team.

One of my concerns with Castle is that his D is actually being overrated. He played for a Connecticut team that was great defensively, and all of his defensive impact stats put him 5th among starters, with Clingan and Spencer leading the way by a good margin, and even Karaban and Newton rating out...

Ghost pepper Jordans.

I'd prefer to make it an unprotected Worst-Of as opposed to a Top-7 protected Best Of, if you really wanted to move up for Castle. You probably want to be on being a playoff team by then, and you'll have a roster full of recent draft picks from 2024-26, so you may not really want 2 in 2027 (not to...

If you believe my Trade Value Chart (which one may or may not), then the difference between #5 and #8 is 500 points, which also happens to be the value of a Year+3 (2027) pick in the 11-20 range (which is probably a fair estimate for a Top 7 protected pick). So in theory, by my chart, the Vec trade...

It's that damn Cuban, we were fine and dandy till he showed up. It ain't been the same since and it never will be like it was, Deads. He put the stopper in our bottle (we won that last back-to-back and he then took a rubber mallet and hammered that stopper down lock tight.) We had it all. A...

Jordan almonds?

As I said, Splits...Like rabid dogs just for him making President.

Supposedly, Mitchell does NOT want him there. I don’t think he’ll sign the extension they want him to until Garland is gone.

Sochan, no. The future pick, depends. If you really want to secure a guy you have great faith in, then sure. A top five player in this draft may very well be better than the number 10 player in 2027. In fact, I'd say probably. Like with the Atlanta trade, they wound up picking Cam Reddish. Yeesh. ...

I’m still really high on Dilly, kid came off the bench averaging like 23 mins a game and still put up 15ppg, 4ast, on 44% from 3 as a freshman. Him or carter gotta be the pick at #8 Imo.

If Garland is unavailable, then Mitchell is gone. Now that trade becomes interesting. Mitchell looks like he wants to play in a big market, but Cavs won't let him go for nothing. Lakers and Heat best offers are pathetic, Nets could do it with their wings and Phoenix picks, but if Mitchell...

Supposedly, Mitchell does NOT want him there. I don’t think he’ll sign the extension they want him to until Garland is gone.

At least at the prices other teams are willing to pay to get him, for now. Things may come to a head later, though.

My bad. Maybe I read it wrong, but it felt like you were implying cause Rice had better 'feel/court awareness/court mapping' (at the time) - which he should since he's a 4 - year college player - that he was the better prospect. That might not have been what you intended, but I notice a lot...

Indict the I.R.S., Homer.

Effy, come see!!!...Dumper still battin' a thousand...ain't been wrong once. Nary 1 time. Nary.

1800624799552848339 Sounds like Garland might be off the table.

He will always be bad at d just with his size alone.That fact that he doesnt care to try to plaY d will hurt him as well.Your taking a gamble that he will be great with scoring and playmaking and help him elevate wemby.Taking him with castle would be smart imo as well.

Wemby is the engine he is the floor raiser. Ceiling raisers are high end role players.

yup....i hope hes open minded and understands he may not be a pg in the nba.Hopefully the spurs talk to him about this before drafting him.

He actually never said that. The second part of the sentence is true, though. My take is that he doesn’t want to go somewhere with a heliocentric PG, and he never touches the ball. The school he picked was the ultimate share the ball offense, even though he could have picked any school with his...

I think with Dillingham the main problem is the D. He was bad and can he improves a lot ? Offensively he is good tough not on Trae Young at Oklahoma level. Young can create more imo.

These trade up scenarios are sickening. You don't give up a developing 6'8" forward to move up 3 spots, and you don't give up a pick that may be more valuable than #5 outright. Good grief, I hope the FO isn't stupid enough to fall for any of these.

Sochan’s not untouchable by any means, but I agree, trading him to move up two or three spots in a flat draft is not a decision that a front office in possession of its faculties would make.

then why isnt trump in jail he defrauded the irs all thru the 90’s and early 2000’s he paid zero income taxes one year and took a fraudulent 70-80 million write off another year as president- his handpicked guy heading the irs shielded him from even providing lawful subpoenaed irs forms...

you're the one who made those claims simmer down, no need to get so angry little guy

2/10 got a little chuckle. The math is overated to be sure. But to say it's not involved in the strategy at all. :lol