If Sochan doesn’t move the needle on the offensive end, that’s okay. There are still some home run swigs later you can take at 20 like Hardy or Miller.
I’d definitely take Mathurin if he’s there tho
We've got to come out of this draft with some size and athleticism. If we use no. 9 on Mathurin/Daniels/Davis, we've got 20/25 to go for it. Unless Eason is on the board at 20, that leaves Liddell as the most likely candidate. And if the FO goes talent over fit at 20 and decide to use 25 (may be...
Leonardo was a piece of shit as a player and is a piece of shit as an exec
Terrible person all around
But PSG doesn’t have CL DNA, unless they get Zidane
exactly. Moving up 3 spots shouldn't cost much and if that's on the table the Spurs should absolutely pull the trigger. Keegan Murray is the perfect fit at the 4 for the type of offense we are trying to run
9 + Richardson is probably not enough to get you 7th. But if the Blazers can't trade for someone better and are not enamored with anyone in particular, it's doable, give or take a pick or two.
9 + McDermott will push you back, not forward. He's a burden, and the cap space has much more value than...
Right. There seems to be some overrating those top picks because we missed out on the lottery. People fell in love with their favorites. Honestly, though, I don't see any of the top 3-4 as sure fire players at all. Much rather stay where we are, or at least not sell the farm to take limited upside...
The retards here would rather parrot WHITE CIS MALE INCEL KILLS AGAIN while putting their heads in the dirt when some SUV runs over white grannies on Christmas et al.
Socialist countries in the paper
Low income-China.
Lower-middle-income-Cuba, Mongolia, North Korea, Albania.
Upper-middle-income-Yugoslavia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, USSR, Czechoslovakia, East Germany
I mean the Spurs have done it several times before. Doesn't mean it's a lock by any means, but the point is that nothing about the first 4, 7 or whatever number of players in this draft that makes them a lock to be the best in the draft.
Then you'd be a terrible GM. You know what you have with DJM and Jak, you have no idea with you three college players with zero games in the NBA, except they ain't future superstars and you'd have 3 starting rookies at the same time in a team getting destroyed every night. Not vey good to learn the...
gotta say I'm very high on EJ Liddell after seeing the combine numbers. At first I thought he could be undersized, but having the highest vert in the combine and a 6'11 wingspan certainly make up for that. Very polished player, good rim protector, passer and shooter with an NBA ready body. Can...
- Why isn't this kid talked enough?
- 6'10 without shoes / 235 with handles, back to the post moves and knows how to set strong picks?
- Averaged 19.4 points, 8.4 rebounds and 2.9 assists per game while shooting 48.4 percent (251-for-519) from the field and 35.2 percent (37-for-105) on...
I think trading up to 6 though should be relatively easy if SA values Keegan though…should not be that hard to move up. Especially if its with POR at pick 7. You can trade Doug McDermott or Richardson + 9 for pick 7 + filler and that gets POR a win now piece and still a lottery pick for now/future...
If CHA reason for firing Borrego is because they want to be a PO team and took “a step backwards” then why would they not just trade their lottery picks for someone like Jak to actually help them win now?
Jak would be a slam dunk if you’re pick 13 or 15 turned out as good so why not guarantee...
LMAO this dude betrayed Milan to gon win a scudetto with Inter, but now he is watching his former team celebrate :lmao
https://twitter.com/iricky22/status/1528436191669911552
Yes, but also no. They were missing a star, but most of their best players are home-grown talent, including Richardson, whom they were able to use as the main trade piece. It's not very easy to imagine the Spurs as a destination a star would force his way to, but Butler had been traded multiple...
