Here it is, the BBC Covers WTC 7!!!!!!!

[Galileo]

Here it is, the BBC Covers WTC 7!!!!!!!
BBC's "The Third Tower"
http://www.911blogger.com/node/16541



Destined to be an all-time classic.

[ChumpDumper]

Yep. It certainly shows the twoofers as the loons they are.

[Galileo]

Yep. It certainly shows the twoofers as the loons they are.

you made your post 2 minutes after I did. The BBC program is 59 minutes long. I don't believe you watched it yet.

I suggest you spend less time watching the Spurstalk board, and more time watching WTC 7.

[ChumpDumper]

You think this is the only forum I read?

I'm about 3/4 of the way though after downloading a nice QT file.

[ChumpDumper]

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=VDL1FUZ3

[DarrinS]

That's it. I'm naming my left nut Galileo and my right nut Nbadan.

[ChumpDumper]

Some nice footage of WTC7 before 9/11 I hadn't seen before. Nice specific interviews with people who were there -- although the Barry Jennings part was weirdly handled (no mention that he wasn't alone when trapped in 7, even though he keeps saying "we").

For all the airtime Richard Gage got, he wasn't terribly effective.

Dylan Avery is still a douche.

[DarrinS]

It's sad that douchebags like these three guys get wealthy at the expense of simpletons like Galileo.

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/stooges.jpg

[ChumpDumper]

Dylan loses his shit at the end when presented with a quote from Richard Clarke saying the government is not competent or secretive enough to pull off 9/11. He drops a few f-bombs and says of course Clarke is going to protect his former bosses. Nevermind that Clarke has done nothing but attack his former boss Bush since 2003.

What do you expect from an auter who lets this get by on the "Final Cut" of his magnum opus?

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee139/tasteoflog/vlcsnap-74357.jpg

(this is vidcap from the BBC documentary -- it's good to see this reaching a wider audience)

[Spur-Addict]

Dylan loses his shit at the end when presented with a quote from Richard Clarke saying the government is not competent or secretive enough to pull off 9/11. He drops a few f-bombs and says of course Clarke is going to protect his former bosses. Nevermind that Clarke has done nothing but attack his former boss Bush since 2003.

What do you expect from an auter who lets this get by on the "Final Cut" of his magnum opus?

http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee139/tasteoflog/vlcsnap-74357.jpg

(this is vidcap from the BBC documentary -- it's good to see this reaching a wider audience)

If this was planned, you only need to look at who would benefit. Those who benefit are those who loan all the money to nations to engage in combat. In our case, it would be the federal reserve owners, and the fed is private. Yes, at least a staggering 80% of the Fed is private, at least. Essentially it is a privately owned central bank. They charge interest on the dollar, which causes massive debt numbers. The fed is also responsible for the massive inflation. They print money out of thin air, then inject it into the economy causing the dollar to lose it's value rapidly. Sounds like counterfeit doesn't it? Essentially it is. Those who own portions of the fed would also be suspected in owning portions of other private central banks in other countries such as England. The Bank of England, also known as the first private central bank. There are many of these banks, you'd be suprised how many there actually are, and what they've been doing for a long time now.

Try watching: The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of America --- It's on Google for free, and is quite informative. It's almost four hours long, but if you have the time i'd advocate the viewing of it.

[Wild Cobra]

That's it. I'm naming my left nut Galileo and my right nut Nbadan.

Really?

Makes me think you don't respect your nutz much...

How can you degrade your own nutz that way?

[DarrinS]

Really?

Makes me think you don't respect your nutz much...

How can you degrade your own nutz that way?


Well, they live in a dark place and can't think for themselves.


Damn, my left Nbadan itches. Gotta go.

[Tree hugger]

http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/index_files/bush_saud.jpg

[ChumpDumper]

If this was planned, you only need to look at who would benefit. Those who benefit are those who loan all the money to nations to engage in combat. In our case, it would be the federal reserve owners, and the fed is private. Yes, at least a staggering 80% of the Fed is private, at least. Essentially it is a privately owned central bank. They charge interest on the dollar, which causes massive debt numbers. The fed is also responsible for the massive inflation. They print money out of thin air, then inject it into the economy causing the dollar to lose it's value rapidly. Sounds like counterfeit doesn't it? Essentially it is. Those who own portions of the fed would also be suspected in owning portions of other private central banks in other countries such as England. The Bank of England, also known as the first private central bank. There are many of these banks, you'd be suprised how many there actually are, and what they've been doing for a long time now.

Try watching: The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of America --- It's on Google for free, and is quite informative. It's almost four hours long, but if you have the time i'd advocate the viewing of it.I will not.

Tell me what you think really happenend on 9/11.

[RandomGuy]

Try watching: The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control of America --- It's on Google for free, and is quite informative. It's almost four hours long, but if you have the time i'd advocate the viewing of it.

If you are going to spend four hours of your time on something, why not have that something be reading a website that teaches critical thinking skills?

I'd advocate the viewing of it. ;)

[RandomGuy]

you made your post 2 minutes after I did. The BBC program is 59 minutes long. I don't believe you watched it yet.

I suggest you spend less time watching the Spurstalk board, and more time watching WTC 7.

I suggest you spend less time reading pseudo-scientific conspiragarbage, and more time asking honest questions about your heros' theories.

[Dude]

Don't you know by now the only videos that are true are the ones Chump and RandomGuy post.

[ChumpDumper]

What do you think really happened on 9/11?

[sabar]

I'm still waiting for the rationale on how the government/administration is supposedly so inept yet is somehow competent enough to pull off a conspiracy with thousands of potential whistleblowers.

A 9/11 conspiracy is logistically impossible. You're better off spending time on JFK.

[BradLohaus]

I'm still waiting for the rationale on how the government/administration is supposedly so inept yet is somehow competent enough to pull off a conspiracy with thousands of potential whistleblowers.

A 9/11 conspiracy is logistically impossible. You're better off spending time on JFK.

That's pretty much how I see it. With JFK, we're talking about a handful of people. Who knows how many it would take to pull of something as big as 9/11.

But based on other "activities" that have been declassified, I don't doubt that elements of the government would have been willing to do something like 9/11 just based on cost/benefit, but it's just so big.

Also, as I recall, Moneymasters is good, although I don't remember it being 4 hours long. But it's been years since I've seen it. I would think that financial conspiracies are much easier to pull off than ones that involve killing a large number of people. The public has a good understanding of death; we don't have a good understanding of money.

[Smackie Chan]

What do you think really happened on 9/11?


What year?

[ChumpDumper]

2001

[RandomGuy]

What year?


9/11/1298.


That year has always fascinated me.


Ok, not really.

[DarrinS]

That's pretty much how I see it. With JFK, we're talking about a handful of people. Who knows how many it would take to pull of something as big as 9/11.


Even the JFK "conspiracy" has pretty much been debunked.


This is an excellent forensic reconstruction

I especially like the last words that are said at the end of this video. Galileo and Nbadan should listen to those words.

r51wZTaJ3AU

[xrayzebra]

I tell you......the ray guns did it. Space ships and little people with no face. I have it on good information that there really wasn't anyone on those planes, actually the planes didn't exist. It was some kinda special software developed by Bill Gates that makes people see things that don't exist. That is what I was told by my secret friend.
He flys those black helicopters.

[Spur-Addict]

If you are going to spend four hours of your time on something, why not have that something be reading a website that teaches critical thinking skills?

I'd advocate the viewing of it. ;)

Hmmm...Well, I Engage in alot of Philosophy to be honest. Why can't I watch a film if I feel like it?....Furthermore I never stated I believed it was planned. I said "IF".

[Spur-Addict]

I will not.

Tell me what you think really happenend on 9/11.

I think multiple airplanes hit buildings and people died. Whether or not it was planned by the gov't isn't something I dwell on. There certainly are advantages for these events. That is what I dwell on. Legislation can be altered because of public morale and feelings. Sometimes in the middle of passion, reaction can be swift. The use of such events is what matters to me.

[Galileo]

Here it is, the BBC Covers WTC 7!!!!!!!
BBC's "The Third Tower"
http://www.911blogger.com/node/16541



Destined to be an all-time classic.

Barry Jennings Uncut

I've been sitting on this interview for a while, but after viewing the latest BBC piece on WTC7, I feel the time has come to release it in its entirety.

After locating Barry in mid 2007, Jason and I visited him and he graciously granted us an interview during a lunch break. He had agreed to grant us an interview under the conditions that we, at no time, associate his interview with his place of employment.

Jason and I were so thrilled with the content of the interview that we decided to release a few bits and pieces of it on both our show and Alex's.

A few months later, as the film was nearing completion, I called Barry again to touch base and see how things were going. It took him a bit to remember who I was, but as soon as he did, he began complaining about phone calls to his place of employment and that he was in danger of losing his job. He requested to have his interview pulled from Loose Change, and I honored his request.

Fast forward to February, 2008, where I'm doing an interview with the BBC, and I'm informed by their crew that Barry told them the reason he asked for it to be pulled was because of the article on Prisonplanet claiming he was stepping over dead bodies, which he denies saying. I call Barry to attempt to rectify the situation, and he is adamant that he did not use the phrase "we were stepping over people"

Fast forward one more time to two days ago, when the BBC piece finally aired. I now feel an obligation to release his interview, in its entirety, into the public where it belongs for three reasons:

1) To see the difference between the interview he gave us, and the interview he gave the BBC.

2) To establish Barry's timeline in his own words.

3) To preserve his testimony, in his own words, for the historical record.

I have remained true to my word and kept his interview out of the film, however, I can no longer keep it from the public. They deserve to hear Barry's story, out of his own mouth.

As I say in the end of the video, I would appreciate it if Barry could enjoy his privacy and live his life in peace. My intention with releasing this is so his story can be told, not to cause him any further grief or suffering.

WATCH THE VIDEO:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/16573

BBC Piece Post-Mortem: Mark Loizeaux and the Special Engineer
CDI

It is difficult for me to know where to begin peeling away the layers of misinformation the BBC peddled to their audience in last weeks exposé on the collapse of Building 7 of the World Trade Center in New York. There are so many people out there grinding away at the production, I don’t feel the need to repeat what they have already done with journeyman-like effectiveness, yet there is something that I have yet to see addressed that I feel is crucial to exposing the overall lack of trustworthiness of the piece. And there is another related aspect of it, that I feel may in fact, be almost an unintended admission, of sorts.

At issue? Mark Loizeaux’s direct misrepresentation of fact and Peter Hayden’s uncanny admission.

READ MORE:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/16565

The Third Tower - A Critical Review
The Third Tower
A Critical Examination

On July 6, 2008, BBC released a documentary examining the collapse of World Trade Center 7, on September 11, 2001. The film purported to "solve the final mystery" of 9/11 in regards to whether the collapse of the building was due to fire or controlled demolition. The film used interviews of people from both sides of the argument, as well as stock footage and reconstructions to show the viewer the cases to be made for each theory. This is the second film the BBC has created on the subject of alternative theories of 9/11.

The film is highly charged and controversial, with emotions running deep. In this review I will attempt to remove the emotional side of the film and simply look at the facts and opinions offered, their validity, and the BBC's attempt to make a "balanced" film.

Act I

The film opens with a quick introduction that thrusts the viewer into the chaos of 9/11 - the plane impacts and subsequent destruction of the World Trade Center towers that we are all familiar with. But in a rare event, the BBC finally choose to now focus their attention on the little known collapse of World Trade Center 7, almost a decade after the fact. Up until this point in time, WTC7 has largely been ignored in the media - with very small clips here and there, but never telling the whole story. In fact in its previous film, the BBC discussed WTC7 as a small side event and dismissed the controlled demolition claim purely on the word of a Popular Mechanics researcher. Now the BBC has returned and vows to do justice to the subject.

READ MORE:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/16564

BBC's Third Tower: 30 Pieces of Good News
BBC | documentary | Dylan Avery | galileo | Kevin Barrett | left gatekeeping | Media Coverage | Richard Gage | Rolf Lindgren | Steven Jones | wtc 7

BBC's Third Tower: 30 Pieces of Good News

by Dr. Kevin Barrett and Rolf Lindgren

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-wi-candidatefilings-,0,7076949.story

The one-hour BBC program The Third Tower should have a positive effect on spreading the truth about what happened to WTC 7. Despite its attempt to debunk by twisting and omitting facts, there is much to cheer about.

Here are 30 examples from the program:

1) There is a WTC 7, many have never heard of it.

2) No plane hit WTC 7.

3) WTC 7 fell down.

4) Several videos of WTC 7 falling down are shown.

5) The collapse is compared visually to a controlled demolition.

6) Barry Jennings tells of hearing multiple explosions in WTC 7.

7) Barry Jennings was told while in WTC 7 "Get out of there, get out of there now", which sounds very suspicious.

8) Barry Jennings' time-line is not contradicted by anything Barry Jennings says.

9) After seven years, no final report on the collapse of WTC 7 has appeared.

10) The program will generate sales and Internet hits of 'Loose Change'.

11) The program will help raise the profile of Dylan Avery, Richard Gage, and Steven Jones.

READ MORE:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/16570

[ChumpDumper]

10) The program will generate sales and Internet hits of 'Loose Change'.

11) The program will help raise the profile of Dylan Avery, Richard Gage, and Steven Jones.That's all they care about.

Everyone on the scene thought it would collapse.

That's all I care about.

[I am Tom]

Chump is like those girls on the Maury show that have 6 black men DNA tested and not one of them is the father he just refuses to give up.

[Nbadan]

Chump is like those girls on the Maury show that have 6 black men DNA tested and not one of them is the father he just refuses to give up.

:lol

What's incredible is that Chumpy still subscribes to the Church of the Bush administration for the basis his 9/11 faith movement...

[ChumpDumper]

Mouse and Dan, what do you think really happened on 9/11?

[Carnie]

Chump knows how to put on a show!

[ChumpDumper]

"I'm just asking questions."

[mouse]

"I'm just asking a question."

*fixed

You ask the same question over and over. it does not matter if Osama bin laden himself had an autograph picture of Bush next to a truck full of Gold you would say it was photo shopped.

If you was in NY on 9/11 and a hot smoky passport feel from the sky you would say it was fake that someone tossed it out of a building to look like someone else was flying the plane.

But yet you look at some grainy black and white film of some men in space suits walking around on a Hollywood studio set and you claim men went to thew moon back in 1969.

Your're some piece of work my friend.

[ChumpDumper]

You ask the same question over and over.And you never answer it.

What do you think really happened on 9/11?

[mouse]

And you never answer it.

What do you think really happened on 9/11?


People died for no reason. next question......................

[ChumpDumper]

Why do you say that?

[Shelly.]

Because they didn't die until Bush took office. Just think if Bush's dad had a rubber on that night 2974 people would be alive today.

[ChumpDumper]

Why do you think Bush is responsible?

[=RTM=]

Why do you think Bush is responsible?

Your right it was Dick Cheney.

[Nbadan]

I think there was a abundance of intelligence that was out there before 9/11 which should have made the attacks preventable - so, not buying into the administration rhetoric that 'no one could have predicted that terra-ists flying planes into buildings', even though Dick Cheney was preparing for that very scenario on 9/11, your left with two choices - either the Bush administration was negligent in its duty to protect the American people or it played a role in hastening the 9/11attacks...

[ChumpDumper]

Your right it was Dick Cheney.Why do you think Cheney is responsible?

[ChumpDumper]

I think there was a abundance of intelligence that was out there before 9/11 which should have made the attacks preventable - so, not buying into the administration rhetoric that 'no one could have predicted that terra-ists flying planes into buildings', even though Dick Cheney was preparing for that very scenario on 9/11, your left with two choices - either the Bush administration was negligent in its duty to protect the American people or it played a role in hastening the 9/11attacks...Stunning inaccuracies aside, what do you think really happened on 9/11?

[PhotoShop]

Why do you think Cheney is responsible?

When your child gets caught smoking weed you blame the parents. Are you saying Dick and Bush are not in charge of America?

Funny how when Clinton was prez he got all the blame, now that Bush is prez, it's someone else's fault?

I can only imagine in about 5 years from now when Chump matures to an adult how he and his Bush loving friends will feel when they look back to some of the moronic replies they posted.

[DarrinS]

I can't believe the guys from Popular Mechanics took the time to debate these ass clowns.

stVmEmJ666M

[mouse]

There are two sides to 9/11 The truth or The Chump

[DarrinS]

There are two sides to 9/11 The truth or The Chump


You're right. The truth is, the government has been breeding aliens at Wright Patterson Air Force base since 1947 (you know, the ones that crashed in Roswell?). Anyway, the aliens were able to remote pilot the planes using mental telepathy. The entire goal was to bring down WTC7. The other planes were just decoys.

[Wild Cobra]

I think there was a abundance of intelligence that was out there before 9/11 which should have made the attacks preventable -

So why didn't president Clinton act on it?

Funny how so many times in the past, I head the Clinton administration briefed the Bush adminoistration on possible attacks. It must have not been important to president Clinton to take care of it. If not important to him, why should president Bush have wasted his time on something president Clinton ignored?

You guys have to take a position and stop flip-flopping as it suits you for Bush Bashing needs.

[Cant_Be_Faded]

It's funny because you can answer chumpdumper and he will still be unsatisfied until you present him with a document as big as the 9/11 commission report. Thats why noone even bothers to try these days because when we threw our opinions out there, you refused to acknowledge them in typical Chumpdumping fashion.


Loose Change guys rule, I wish I could get rich off dumbasses.

I think the 3rd tower has explosives in it, and did not fall because of the Twin Towers at all.

[Big Worm]

I am glad Chump and his tea bagging salad tossing Bush lovers keep posting here.

it shows us all the how fucked up this Nation is thanks to their GOD

http://www.donkeytusks.com/images/GOP.gif

[Big Worm]

So why didn't president Clinton act on it?

Funny how so many times in the past, I head the Clinton administration briefed the Bush adminoistration on possible attacks.

Psssssst! Don't forget Bush's Daddy the "other" Bush?

was already in Iraq why didn't he finish the job?

If you going to go to the past? Why didn't Regan do shit?

[Nbadan]

Mouse is right, Chumpy makes blanket statements like..


Stunning inaccuracies aside...

..but never bothers to have a constructive debate or present information that challenges what was said...it's impossible to have a rational exchange with a person who thinks they are right just because they buy into the gov'ment explanation about a event hook-line and sinker...this why I believe that until we have another investigation into the events leading to 9/11 there's no use wasting time with someone like Chumpy....

[ChumpDumper]

It's funny because you can answer chumpdumper and he will still be unsatisfied until you present him with a document as big as the 9/11 commission report. Thats why noone even bothers to try these days because when we threw our opinions out there, you refused to acknowledge them in typical Chumpdumping fashion.I asked what you guys thought really happened on 9/11. I acknowledge you at least said something. It just didn't make a lot of sense to me.



I think the 3rd tower has explosives in it, and did not fall because of the Twin Towers at all.I think it got hit by big chunks of the north tower and burned for several hours, compromising its unique design to the point of collapse.

[ChumpDumper]

Mouse is right, Chumpy makes blanket statements like..



..but never bothers to have a constructive debate or present information that challenges what was said...it's impossible to have a rational exchange with a person who thinks they are right just because they buy into the gov'ment explanation about a event hook-line and sinker...this why I believe that until we have another investigation into the events leading to 9/11 there's no use wasting time with someone like Chumpy....What do you think really happened on 9/11?

Tell us something more believable and more convincing than the official story. If you don't convince me you will clearly convince the thousands of your dedicated readers on this board. You brag about being right all the time. Show us how right you are about 9/11.

You obviously have it all figured out -- let's hear it.

Will i make you feel better if I don't comment on it? Seems like that is your biggest fear since you didn't haven't brought up the government monitors of this board for awhile.

[DarrinS]

What do you think really happened on 9/11?

Tell us something more believable and more convincing than the official story. If you don't convince me you will clearly convince the thousands of your dedicated readers on this board. You brag about being right all the time. Show us how right you are about 9/11.

You obviously have it all figured out -- let's hear it.

Will i make you feel better if I don't comment on it? Seems like that is your biggest fear since you didn't haven't brought up the government monitors of this board for awhile.



You know I've come to realize ChumpDumper? You can't argue with these people. It's like arguing with someone that believes in Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, or the Chupacabra. The "twoofer" movement is a cult following. They will never be convinced with any facts or rational arguments because their "movement" has turned into a kind of religion. They need to just be written off as the lunatic fringe they are. I'm sure the Dylan Avery's of the world (who would otherwise be making Happy Meals) are glad that they have such a loyal, albeit gullible, cult following to help pad their bank accounts.

[Galileo]

The 12 Guys

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43Y3B__mXzU&eurl=http://www.911blogger.com/node/16637

Proof that the WTC was a controlled demolition!

[DarrinS]

The 12 Guys

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43Y3B__mXzU&eurl=http://www.911blogger.com/node/16637

Proof that the WTC was a controlled demolition!



I guess you didn't see my post in the other thread


A guy on this video actally says the explosives could have been planted when the building was erected. That was 1983, so I guess Reagan was in on this too.

Do you guys realize how absolutely shithouse crazy you sound? :lmao

MxOfatzx3SI

[DarrinS]

The 12 Guys

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43Y3B__mXzU&eurl=http://www.911blogger.com/node/16637

Proof that the WTC was a controlled demolition!


Well now THAT was some great evidence. :lmao

[Galileo]

Well now THAT was some great evidence. :lmao

That's when Ollie North was out and about, the 1980s.

[Galileo]

Former "Star Wars" Chief to State Legislators: Urge University to Re-Hire Kevin Barrett! Contact: Kevin Barrett, 608-583-2132; [email protected]
For Immediate Release - July 22, 2008

Contact:

Dr. Kevin Barrett; 608-583-2132, [email protected]

On Tuesday, July 29th, the head of the "Star Wars" space weapons program under two U.S. presidents, Dr. Robert Bowman, will ask State Legislators to request the re-instatement of Dr. Kevin Barrett as a University of Wisconsin instructor.
Col. Bowman, a rocket scientist with a doctorate from Cal Tech who flew 101 combat missions in Vietnam as a fighter pilot, will present his request to the legislature at a press conference in the State Capitol building, Room 330 Southwest, at 11 a.m. Tuesday 7/29/08.
Kevin Barrett, the target of a 2006 witch-hunt by State Rep. Steve Nass, has not been rehired at UW-Madison, despite his repeated applications for open positions, since he finished teaching his controversial Islam course in fall 2006. His most recent application, for the spring 2008 semester, was rejected in favor of a less-qualified and less-experienced applicant.
Barrett was also turned down for a tenure-track position at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater in 2006. Then-Dean of Humanities Howard Ross told Barrett "You were discriminated against." Ross, who was part of the hiring process, says that Barrett was the most qualified of the three finalists, but that the position was offered to the other two finalists because of Barrett's political views. When both of the less-qualified finalists turned down the job, the University closed the position, denying students Arabic and Humanities instruction, rather than hire Barrett, whose teaching has repeatedly received excellent reviews from colleagues and students alike. Barrett is currently the self-styled "peace candidate" for Congress in Wisconsin's District 3: http://www.barrettforcongress.us
Bowman argues that Barrett should be rehired on free-speech and academic freedom grounds, regardless of the merits of his views on 9/11 and other political controversies. Additionally, Bowman -- a former fighter pilot who "knows the drill" regarding interceptions of errant airliners -- agrees with Barrett that the official story of 9/11 is "impossible" and that a genuine investigation, focusing on the possibility of official complicity, is urgently needed.
Dr. Bob Bowman will be speaking at the University of Wisconsin-Madison on Monday (see below for details). For more information about Bob Bowman see http://www.thepatriots.us
* * *
Barrett to Introduce "Best 9/11 Documentary" In Viroqua
On Tuesday, July 29th, 6:30-8:30 p.m. the film 9/11 Mysteries, considered by many the best 9/11 truth documentary, will be shown at Western Technical College, 220 S. Main, Viroqua, WI; click here for map and directions. Dr. Kevin Barrett will introduce the film and lead a discussion afterwards.
* * *
Former "Star Wars" Space Weapons Chief Coming to Lone Rock
On Wednesday, July 30th, 7 p.m., meet Dr. Bob Bowman at Kevin Barrett's open house! RSVP [email protected], 608-583-2132. Fine Mediterranean food from former Casablanca Deli chef Fatna Bellouchi will be available, and a $10 donation to cover costs is requested.
Bob Bowman: http://www.thepatriots.us Kevin Barrett: http://www.truthjihad.com

[DarrinS]

^^^ WTF does congress have to do with reinstating a university professor?