No one cares about Iranian missile testing?

[DarrinS]

I know the legal battles of Carl Rove and the off-color remarks of Jesse Jackson are vitally important to national security, but WTF?

[Oh, Gee!!]

I thought Dubya told them to stop last year.

[Viva Las Espuelas]

don't worry. Obamessiah will talk to them and everything will be alright





























:lmao :lmao
:lol :rollin:rollin:lol

[spursfor5]

Nope theres no way this is more important that that child beauty queen.

[2centsworth]

why worry, Obama is gonna persuade the world to live in peace and harmony with his words.

[Nbadan]

Iran has had missiles for a long time - why is this important?

[JohnnyMarzetti]

McSame wants to continue sending more cigarettes to Iran and kill them that way. What an idiot.

[ChumpDumper]

don't worry. Obamessiah will talk to them and everything will be alrightLike the Bush administration talked to North Korea?

[Viva Las Espuelas]

Like the Bush administration talked to North Korea?
youre comparing kim jung to ahmedenijad? :lmao what an idiot. i don't recall kim jung saying he wanted to wipe a whole country/civilization off the map repeatedly followed by us. kim jung is a vain douchebag

[ChumpDumper]

youre comparing kim jung to ahmedenijad?Bush did.


:lmao what an idiot. i don't recall kim jung saying he wanted to wipe a whole country/civilization off the map repeatedly followed by us.He pretty much has. You just haven't paid any attention.


kim jung is a vain douchebagWith actual nukewlar weapons.

[xrayzebra]

Iran has had missiles for a long time - why is this important?

It's not dan, go back to sleep. Daddy Obama will be in to tuck you in, in a minute. He just needs to talk to the Iranians and tell them how sorry he is that we made him mad. And that he is going to stop the U.S. from doing any more missile research. Lullaby and goodnight.....tah...tah....tah.

[ChumpDumper]

So what is McCain going to do about it?

Invade?

[RandomGuy]

youre comparing kim jung to ahmedenijad? :lmao what an idiot. i don't recall kim jung saying he wanted to wipe a whole country/civilization off the map repeatedly followed by us. kim jung is a vain douchebag


Bush compared them when he lumped them together.

Kim Jung Il has repeatedly maintained that he would "unite" Korea, and he wasn't talking peacefully.

Uniting in this case fully means wiping the country known as South Korea off the map...

[RandomGuy]

So what is McCain going to do about it?

Invade?

McCain will make noises to satisfy his electoral base, and then...


talk to the Iranians.

It is simply the rational thing to do.

[RandomGuy]

I know the legal battles of Carl Rove and the off-color remarks of Jesse Jackson are vitally important to national security, but WTF?

It is a response to the recent Israeli wargames that were widely seen as practice for a potential airstrike on Iranian nukular facilities.

Don't worry the decider is on it. :depressed

[clambake]

isn't anyone concerned that bush is fucking up again while Iran fires missles and N. Korea test nukes?

[xrayzebra]

So what is McCain going to do about it?

Invade?

I have no idea. But he hasn't said he is going to set down eyeball to eyeball with the little guy and tell him he is being naughty and it is all our fault.


isn't anyone concerned that bush is fucking up again while Iran fires missles and N. Korea test nukes?

How's that Clam, should Bush invade? Have Israel attack? Pretty broad statement without you telling us how he is screwing up.

[DisAsTerBot]

why are we the only ones allowed to have missles???

[clambake]

almajamitupyours is buddies with Maliki. why doesn't bush ask him to talk for him?

the paki's hate the new afghans, and the true fate of iraq lies just beneath the surface.

i don't want bush to touch another thing, ever.

[xrayzebra]

why are we the only ones allowed to have missles???


Why should we allow someone that swears to destroy us and Israel to build missles and acquire atomic weapons?

[clambake]

Why should we allow someone that swears to destroy us and Israel to build missles and acquire atomic weapons?

they're probably worried about things that can happen to nations with oil.

[RandomGuy]

almajamitupyours is buddies with Maliki. why doesn't bush ask him to talk for him?

the paki's hate the new afghans, and the true fate of iraq lies just beneath the surface.

i don't want bush to touch another thing, ever.

Too late for the Chancellor of Germany..

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/V/b/1/bush_groping_merkel.jpg

[RandomGuy]

Bush can touch this guy all he wants to though...

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/R/e/1/mccain_bush_hug.jpg

In fact, I would like to see more pictures of them together.

I wonder why they don't hang out more often? Hmmmm....

[clambake]

Bush can touch this guy all he wants to though...

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/R/e/1/mccain_bush_hug.jpg

In fact, I would like to see more pictures of them together.

I wonder why they don't hang out more often? Hmmmm....

this picture is fucking creepy.

[RandomGuy]

Just for the love of God don't let him touch the dance floor...

http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2007/04/bush2EPA_450x450.jpg

[RandomGuy]

Too late for the Chancellor of Germany..

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/V/b/1/bush_groping_merkel.jpg

Ok, this is going in my siggy at some point, as much as it make me wince.

[DarrinS]

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/R/e/1/mccain_bush_hug.jpg


Just hold me you big lug.

[clambake]

Ok, this is going in my siggy at some point, as much as it make me wince.

he doesn't know he's the most repulsive person in the room. :lol

[Wild Cobra]

isn't anyone concerned that bush is fucking up again while Iran fires missles and N. Korea test nukes?

Typical of libtards.

President Bush is bad because he doesn't stop N. Korea from testing nukes.

President Bush is bad because he doesn't do anything about Iran

Iraq has shown just cause to be bealt with.

President Bush is bad because he deals with Iraq.

Is there ever a reason not to blame president Bush?

[peewee's lovechild]

Typical of libtards.

President Bush is bad because he doesn't stop N. Korea from testing nukes.

President Bush is bad because he doesn't do anything about Iran

Iraq has shown just cause to be bealt with.

President Bush is bad because he deals with Iraq.

Is there ever a reason not to blame president Bush?

I don't blame him for the dry brisket I had for lunch.

But, I blame you for spewing your homo-lust for Bush on this thread.

[ChumpDumper]

Typical of libtards.

President Bush is bad because he doesn't stop N. Korea from testing nukes.

President Bush is bad because he doesn't do anything about Iran

Iraq has shown just cause to be bealt with.When did they explode a nuclear weapon?

[Wild Cobra]

When did they explode a nuclear weapon?

Korea?

They had a failed test. A very expensive dirty bomb. That's all it turned out to be.

[peewee's lovechild]

Korea?

They had a failed test. A very expensive dirty bomb. That's all it turned out to be.

Then they posed a real threat.

[clambake]

Korea?

They had a failed test. A very expensive dirty bomb. That's all it turned out to be.

wow. the n.koreans testing nukes on bush's watch. that is scary.

[Wild Cobra]

Then they posed a real threat.

You know, an open mind is needed and people shouldn't jump to conclusions.

The test failed.

I'll bet nobody worried because we probably had someone inside operative who made it fail.

We will not know for some time if that is the case.

What were we to do? A pre-emptive strike against N. Korea, when all the demonrats and libtards are crying about Iraq?

Believe me. I do know a little about such things working the the "Nuclear Theater" for six years while I was in the service. I don't know the proper answers, but I do know they didn't just do nothing.

[peewee's lovechild]

You know, an open mind is needed and people shouldn't jump to conclusions.

The test failed.

I'll bet nobody worried because we probably had someone inside operative who made it fail.

We will not know for some time if that is the case.

What were we to do? A pre-emptive strike against N. Korea, when all the demonrats and libtards are crying about Iraq?

Believe me. I do know a little about such things working the the "Nuclear Theater" for six years while I was in the service. I don't know the proper answers, but I do know they didn't just do nothing.

But, a pre-emptive strike against Iran is okay, regardless of the "demonrats and libtards"?

You're consistency is flawed.

[Wild Cobra]

But, a pre-emptive strike against Iran is okay, regardless of the "demonrats and libtards"?

You're consistency is flawed.

Must I make the obvious arguments? Where do you get your news?

N. Korea had the potential of a threat if they had a sucessful bomb that could be sold. They were not a threat until they had an actual working bomb.

Iran is the same for a threat, except.... The president of Iran has vowed to destroy Israel!

Why don't we take action?

We won't have to. Israel will take action if they must, and they have far better intelligence in the region than we do. They have a vested interest in their security. If someday they strike Iran, you'll know why.

[clambake]

I'll bet nobody worried because we probably had someone inside operative who made it fail.
:lmao


Believe me. I do know a little about such things working the the "Nuclear Theater" for six years while I was in the service.
my antenna sucks.

[peewee's lovechild]

Must I make the obvious arguments? Where do you get your news?

N. Korea had the potential of a threat if they had a sucessful bomb that could be sold. They were not a threat until they had an actual working bomb.

Iran is the same for a threat, except.... The president of Iran has vowed to destroy Israel!

Why don't we take action?

We won't have to. Israel will take action if they must, and they have far better intelligence in the region than we do. They have a vested interest in their security. If someday they strike Iran, you'll know why.

So, you're saying we shouldn't take action against Iran?
I just want clarification.

[Wild Cobra]

So, you're saying we shouldn't take action against Iran?
I just want clarification.

Why do you sall try to pin people down to absolute answers to general questions?

In the case of nuke's, no. We should let Israel take the lead. There are other reasons to possibly deal with Iran in the future. Their support of terrorism.

Yes, we may have to deal with them, but in the aspect of global terrorism. Not about nukes. Again, Israel is their first target if they get 'the bomb' so I say let Israel deal with them. I say the only way ge get involved with Iran over nukes is if Israel asks for our help.

[Anti.Hero]

Too late for the Chancellor of Germany..

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/V/b/1/bush_groping_merkel.jpg

ahahahahahaha

STILL funny.

[Nbadan]

Why do you sall try to pin people down to absolute answers to general questions?

In the case of nuke's, no. We should let Israel take the lead. There are other reasons to possibly deal with Iran in the future. Their support of terrorism.

Yes, we may have to deal with them, but in the aspect of global terrorism. Not about nukes. Again, Israel is their first target if they get 'the bomb' so I say let Israel deal with them. I say the only way ge get involved with Iran over nukes is if Israel asks for our help.

Once the bombs and missiles start falling do you really think Iran is gonna pause and care over who is bombing them? No...they're gonna let their short, medium and long range missiles fly to Israel, to the Green Zone in Iraq, to ships sailing in the Gulf and to other American bases throughout the Middle east....

[Nbadan]

A missile to far...


As news spread across the world of Iran’s provocative missile tests, so did an image of four missiles heading skyward in unison. Unfortunately, it appeared to contain one too many missiles, a fact that had not emerged before the photo appeared on the front pages of The Los Angeles Times, The Financial Times, The Chicago Tribune and several other newspapers as well as on BBC News, MSNBC, Yahoo! News, NYTimes.com and many other major news Web sites.

... the second missile from the right appears to be the sum of two other missiles in the image. The contours of the billowing smoke match perfectly near the ground, as well in the immediate wake of the missile. Only a small black dot in the reddish area of exhaust seems to differ from the missile to its left, though there are also some slight variations in the color of the smoke and the sky.

... Agence France-Presse retracted its four-missile version this morning, saying that the image of four missiles was “apparently digitally altered” by Iranian state media. The fourth missile “has apparently been added in digital retouch to cover a grounded missile that may have failed during the test,” the agency said.

Linky (http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/in-an-iranian-image-a-missile-too-many)

Here's the cropped versions...

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/07/10/world/ledemissiles1.jpg

Picture from a Iranian new site:

http://media.farsnews.com/%5CMedia%5C8508%5CImageReports%5C8508110198%5C1_85 08110198_L600.jpg

Actual image: (but who knows for sure)

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/07/10/world/ledemissiles2.jpg

Not actual image, but why stop at 4?

http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g116/mcg0125/missiles.jpg

And finally, actual image....if the missiles were built by NASA...

http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/d21da57f59.jpg

[xrayzebra]

No...they're gonna let their short, medium and long range missiles fly to Israel, to the Green Zone in Iraq, to ships sailing in the Gulf and to other American bases throughout the Middle east....

How many missiles do you think they have and how accurate do you think they will be? Obviously you think they have a great number of missiles and can strike with great accuracy.

You ever stop to think that there may be a little obstacle to their missile offensive, called Patriot. I feel fairly certain the Patriot has been improved since it last use. Don't you?

[boutons_]

http://kamangir.net/2008/07/09/fake_pictures_missile_drill/

[JoeChalupa]

Bring 'em on!!!!!!

Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!

[ChumpDumper]

Korea?

They had a failed test. A very expensive dirty bomb. That's all it turned out to be.No, Iraq.

The answer is never.

The Iraq threat turned out to be no threat at all.

[George Gervin's Afro]

Why don't the resident conservatives just man up and admit they want to bomb everyone they don't like.. anyone who says something bad about the USA? let's bomb 'em!

[George Gervin's Afro]

IRAN MISSILE TEST BIG BLUFF: OLD ROCKETS, BOGUS VIDEO
Fri Jul 11 2008 15:18:02 ET

Many of Iran's claims related to missile tests during "Great Prophet III" war games -- appear to be smoke and mirrors!

The missiles tested DID NOT not have 2,000-kilometer range, the NEW YORK TIMES is planning to report on Saturday. It was no Shahab-3 missile, able to reach Israel. It was an older missile that was out of production, newsroom sources tell DRUDGE.

A video showed what appeared to be many missiles being fired is actually one missile, filmed from different angles.

NYT's Bill Broad is planning to quote Pentagon officials and military insiders.




:lol:lol:lol:lol


but,but,but they said some bad stuff about us and our friends... there is a reason why conservatives are dying breed...

[01.20.09]

Why don't the resident conservatives just man up and admit they want to bomb everyone they don't like.. anyone who says something bad about the USA? let's bomb 'em!

Because the "imminent threat" propaganda worked in 2004.

[xrayzebra]

Why don't the resident conservatives just man up and admit they want to bomb everyone they don't like.. anyone who says something bad about the USA? let's bomb 'em!

I need your address.:lol:lol And don't be alarmed at the black helo's.

[boutons_]

dubya and his accomplices talking up the false Iranian threat keeps oil high, and $Bs of "loose lips" oil profits flowing to the US oilcos.

[The Franchise]

why are we the only ones allowed to have missles???

Best fucking post in this thread!!!

[Wild Cobra]

No, Iraq.

The answer is never.

The Iraq threat turned out to be no threat at all.

Well, you know, hind-sight is 20-20.

Those who rely on it like wou are just talking out your ass.

A leader must make decisions based on tghe intel at the time, before knowing what the future truth really is.

And agan, there were other reasons to go to war. When will you libtards stop focusing on only the weakest argument of many?

[Wild Cobra]

Why don't the resident conservatives just man up and admit they want to bomb everyone they don't like.. anyone who says something bad about the USA? let's bomb 'em!

Pssssst...

Your ignorance is showing...

[boutons_]

"other reasons to go to war"

In foresight and proven in hindsight, they were ALL bullshit.

Like an oil reason, which in hindsight, was the only foresight the neo-cunts and hawks had, as every other fabricated, hyped "reason" turned out to be bullshit, but the oil was always there.

dickhead's secret National Energy Policy? "oilcos do no domestic/offshore drilling, just wait for the US military to provide access to much cheaper Iraqi oil fields."

WMD was agreed upon by the Exec as the one reason to sell the war, and was how Powell and his known bullshit of mobile weapons labs got the UN authorization vote. dubya, not Saddam, removed WMD inspectors who had found nothing because as the invaders found, there was on WMD there.

WC still spins the unnecessary imperialistic war of choice for oil as an accident of bad intel.

[Viva Las Espuelas]

why are we the only ones allowed to have missles???


Best fucking post in this thread!!!
http://goatmilk.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/khomeini.jpg
http://www.haaretz.com/hasite/images/iht_daily/D180807/300ahmedinejad_REU.jpg
http://www.nndb.com/people/641/000026563/qaddafi-crop.jpg
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2006/11/12/13e_saddam_narrowweb__300x398,0.jpg
http://albanysinsanity.wnymedia.net/blogs/files/2008/03/moqtada-al-sadr.jpg
http://www.longwarjournal.org/images/osama-bin-laden-1998-thumb.jpg
http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/graphics/attack/images/hijackers_092801.gif


............need i go on?!

[ChumpDumper]

Well, you know, hind-sight is 20-20.

Those who rely on it like wou are just talking out your ass.Sorry dude, I said there wasn't enough reason to invade back in '03. I know it sucks for you to be as wrong as Bush was, but you were.


A leader must make decisions based on tghe intel at the time, before knowing what the future truth really is.Bush decided to invade Iraq right after 9/11. All the intel became outcome-based after that.


And agan, there were other reasons to go to war. When will you libtards stop focusing on only the weakest argument of many?That was THE MAIN reason that Bush and his administration hammered home in the press every chance they got, you stupid piece of shit. Those other reasons were also not sufficient to justify distracting ourselves from the real war on terror for a decade. And again, when will you stop sucking Bush's cock 24/7?

[xrayzebra]

Sorry dude, I said there wasn't enough reason to invade back in '03.

Bush decided to invade Iraq right after 9/11. All the intel became outcome-based after that.

Those reasons were also not sufficient to justify distracting ourselves from the real war on terror for a decade. And again, when will you stop sucking Bush's cock 24/7?

And you accuse me of being old and out of touch. ho-boy!

[ChumpDumper]

And you accuse me of being old and out of touch. ho-boy!You also fight WC for a chance to suck some of that cock. Staying on your knees that long can't be good for you.

[PEP]

A missile to far...



Linky (http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/in-an-iranian-image-a-missile-too-many)

Here's the cropped versions...

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/07/10/world/ledemissiles1.jpg

Picture from a Iranian new site:

http://media.farsnews.com/%5CMedia%5C8508%5CImageReports%5C8508110198%5C1_85 08110198_L600.jpg

Actual image: (but who knows for sure)

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/07/10/world/ledemissiles2.jpg

Not actual image, but why stop at 4?

http://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g116/mcg0125/missiles.jpg

And finally, actual image....if the missiles were built by NASA...

http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/d21da57f59.jpg
You forgot one more picture.

http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r9/PEP007/20080711IranianFauxto.jpg