Paul McCartney

[Jimcs50]

Put on a great halftime show. :smokin

[exstatic]

Thank you Janet and Co. If you hadn't pulled that stunt last year, we probably would have been subjected to Ashlee Simpson.

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

Thank you Janet and Co. If you hadn't pulled that stunt last year, we probably would have been subjected to Ashlee Simpson.

True.

Now every damn family in America better had been watching so we can hopefully move past Janet's titty.

[blackbucket]

I'm just glad that the halftime show is back to being about the music and not the spectacle. I'm sick and tired of most of the crap they have thrown our way. This was a good one.

[Clandestino]

i thought the halftime show was boring as a hell....

[Clandestino]

the show would've been awesome if gun's n roses would've came out when paul sang live and let live...

[Jimcs50]

i thought the halftime show was boring as a hell....

Yeah, the music was boring, we need violence or nudity to make stuff worth watching nowadays. :rolleyes

[exstatic]

Except that G'n'R these days is just Axel, when he shows up, and a bunch of nonames in masks.

This show was guaranteed to be "boring" to you. The NFL was taking ZERO chances with anything controversial.

[Guru of Nothing]

the show would've been awesome if gun's n roses would've came out when paul sang live and let live...

Nothing lie a lame-ass hair band to get your blood flowing.

[Clandestino]

Nothing lie a lame-ass hair band to get your blood flowing.

just like past super bowls when they mix different types of musicians... it is usually pretty cool...

some old boring guy playing a guitar than the piano...couldn't get anymore boring if they tried...

[Clandestino]

Except that G'n'R these days is just Axel, when he shows up, and a bunch of nonames in masks.

This show was guaranteed to be "boring" to you. The NFL was taking ZERO chances with anything controversial.

yup...exactly... that is why my 5 year old kid could've put on a more exciting show..

[IcemanCometh]

fucking sell out

[Clandestino]

Yeah, the music was boring, we need violence or nudity to make stuff worth watching nowadays. :rolleyes

no, it is just that watching my grandpa play the banjo is never exciting...

[GINNNNNNNNNNNNOBILI]

Anyone who appreciates MUSIC woulda liked the halftime show

[Solid D]

no, it is just that watching my grandpa play the banjo is never exciting...

Maybe one day, you'll be talking about the halftime show to the "young and disinterested" saying stuff like, "What's not to like about Cannibal Corpse?" :smokin

[Duff McCartney]

The haftime show was pretty good.

[ALVAREZ6]

The halftime show sucked major ass.

So did the commercials.

[IceColdBrewski]

The halftime show sucked major ass.

So did the commercials.

Agreed on both counts. The Commercials are usually better. The halftime show was boring for those of us who are smart enough to know Paul McCartney was lip syncing.

[Aggie Hoopsfan]

Paul sucked.

[IceColdBrewski]

Paul sucked.

Yep.

[Kori Ellis]

I slept during halftime.

[Aggie Hoopsfan]

What I don't get is what idiots keep coming up with these halftimes? Don't they understand their demographic?

At the Orange Bowl you had Ashley gay ass Simpson trying to prove she wasn't a lip syncher by cracking notes left and right. I'm sure a lot of teenie boppers tuned in for that one.

Tonight you had Paul, I guess they were going after the Viagra/Cialis crowd?

Seriously, the demographic for big sporting events is about 95% males age 18-35. Quit rolling out halftime shows that come in under or twice as old as that demographic, for the love of everything sports fan.

[Johnny_Blaze_47]

Seriously, the demographic for big sporting events is about 95% males age 18-35. Quit rolling out halftime shows that come in under or twice as old as that demographic, for the love of everything sports fan.

Apparently not, though.

How many people bitched that they watched the Super Bowl with their families last year?

Don't get me wrong, I agree with you.

[Mark in Austin]

I'd rather listen to Paul McCartney than watch Britney Spears, Nelly, Aerosmith, Justin Timberlake, and Creed sing 45 second soudbytes from a re-mixed version of "It's gettin hot in here".

A little on the boring side? Maybe. But at least having ADD wasn't a viewing requirement this year.

[Guru of Nothing]

Seriously, the demographic for big sporting events is about 95% males age 18-35. Quit rolling out halftime shows that come in under or twice as old as that demographic, for the love of everything sports fan.

Hence all the monkey commercials.

[Aggie Hoopsfan]

Mark, apparently being a Cialis user was though...

[Mark in Austin]

And this is new? Ditka has been shilling Levitra on sundays all season. There are a lot of 40-60 year old football fans, too. Advertisers aren't dumb enough to spend the money on superbowl commercial time if there wasn't great evidence that their target demographic would be watching.

For every Cialis mention, there were plenty of monkey commercials, Cedric the Entertainer for Bud Light, and trailers for The Longest Yard remake. With 90 gajillion people watching, the 18-35 male isn't the only demographic to pander to.

[SPARKY]

Man who cares? Just as I don't know whether to be offended more by Janet Jackson's right tit being almost entirely exposed in a Super Bowl halftime show or that a right tit was almost entirely exposed and it belonged to Janet Jackson, I frankly could give a damn less. Unless there is 15 minutes of a lesbian orgy hottub scene being shown at halftime I dont care.

[MannyIsGod]

The game was great, fuck the halftime show OR the commercials.

[baseline bum]

Personally, I'd rather they just talked about the game at halftime. I'm glad they got someone with musical talent to do the show this year, bu t Paul wasn't nearly as good as U2 in 2002.

[mattyc]

I thought it was a terrific half time show compared to other years.

Paul can flat out entertain. :cooldevil

[ididnotnothat]

I thought the game sucked as well.

[johnny00]

I thought the half time show was great, the commercials sucked.

[Taco]

Put on a great halftime show. :smokin


I thought it was GREAT!!!

[Jimcs50]

The Super Bowl makes all performers lip sync, including the National Anthem. The reason is that with the accoustics, the performers can not keep time because of the delay. The last time a halftime performer refused to lip sync was the Backstreet Boys, and they were horrible because of the feedback and they were totally off key.


Paul was great. Live and Let Die with the fireworks was the best song. He should have done some earlier songs that rocked more than the Baby you can drive my Car song which was not one of the best songs anyway.

[JFK]

The game was great, fuck the halftime show OR the commercials.


Manny is correct...i watch the game and thats it, i could care less if Buck Owens, Paul McCartney, whoever is out there. and the commercials? i don't care about them one bit.
being a football fan, all i ask is that its a good game and the rest can all go to hell for all i care.

[Clandestino]

I thought it was a terrific half time show compared to other years.

Paul can flat out entertain. :cooldevil

paul was soooo boring... he can sing, but when you are on stage you need more.. just like when you go to a concert of a group you like... you don't want them to just sit on their ass all night..that is lame... paul was lame!

[Clandestino]

also, i guess paul singing about the "california grass" was appropriate too.. he may as well sang Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds...

[CommanderMcBragg]

Paul's show was was a class act.

Isn't that what America wants now?

[Useruser666]

The halftime show sucked. The Beatles are way overrated. And no, I don't want teen pop stars either.

[Shelly]

I didn't watch the game, the halftime show, or the commercials.

[Jimcs50]

The halftime show sucked. The Beatles are way overrated. And no, I don't want teen pop stars either.


Overrated????

Yes, and pussy is overrated too.

[CommanderMcBragg]

The Beatles overrated? You can sure tell there is generation gap!!

[SpursWoman]

Overrated????

Yes, and pussy is overrated too.



I can't believe you of all people would compare Paul McCartney to pussy, Jim. :wow


I'm not a Beatles fan, either. I hold them entirely responsible for the proliferation of boy bands over the last few decades.

:fro

[Useruser666]

Overrated????

Yes, and pussy is overrated too.

Are you saying the Beatles are as good as pussy Jim? I sincerely hope not.




The Beatles overrated? You can sure tell there is generation gap!!

There is no generation gap McBragg. I like a lot of music, but the halftime show was lame and the Beatles ARE overrated. And I do like some of there songs.

[Clandestino]

even you loved the beatles...this was only paul... and a boring as hell 62 year old paul at that.. he just stood there playing the guitar..then sat down and played the piano... BORING!!!

he thought he was in the recording studio or some shit.. when you are on stage in front of millions you have to bring something else!

[CommanderMcBragg]

The Beatles are NOT overrated and if they are than all these hip-hoppers are grotesquely overrated.
The majority of them can't even play an instrument.

Does a musician need to resort to stage theatrics and humping and grinding women to make them more entertaining?
So I guess the concert business would go under if bands performed their music instead of a "show"?

If you can't enjoy the music with your eyes closed then you are not listening but 'watching" the music.

[Useruser666]

The Beatles are NOT overrated and if they are than all these hip-hoppers are grotesquely overrated.
The majority of them can't even play an instrument.

Does a musician need to resort to stage theatrics and humping and grinding women to make them more entertaining?
So I guess the concert business would go under if bands performed their music instead of a "show"?

If you can't enjoy the music with your eyes closed then you are not listening but 'watching" the music.

McBragg, you don't have to flip out. I'm sure your parents would have said, "Who are those 4 boys dancing around like that all crazy! They should get a hair cut! Whippersnappers!"


Oh, and I was watching the halftime show. If I wanted to just listen to it I would have just turned the radio on.
Just because you think the Beatles were God's gift to music doesn't mean they were, or that everyone agrees with you. They were the cutting edge "Backstreet Boys" of their day. They did many of the same social/moral envelope pushing things that young musicians do today. I don't go for glitz and glamour. I just thought that other than those cool "ramp projection TVs" there wasn't that much to the halftime show.

I don't even think that a live musical performance is always the best act to have play. I wonder if there could be something more like the olympic games. There is more than just listening to music at the halftime show. It should be as much a visual production as audio, if not more so.

[Jimcs50]

Are you saying the Beatles are as good as pussy Jim? I sincerely hope not.





There is no generation gap McBragg. I like a lot of music, but the halftime show was lame and the Beatles ARE overrated. And I do like some of there songs.

I am not sure, I do not think I have seen millions of people screaming at pussy before, so the Beatles might be better than pussy.

Let's examine this a bit closer.

A. Has pussy been on the Ed Sullivan show?

No, the Beatles have. Beatles 1 Pussy 0

B. Has pussy had 30 # 1 songs?

No, the Beatles have. Beatles 2 Pussy 0

C. Has pussy influenced millions of young men?

Yes, Beatles 3 Pussy 1

D. Has pussy been imitated over and over?

Well, yes, but as with the Beatles, they did a lousy job. Beatles 4 Pussy 2

E. Does Pussy look better with hair on it?

No, Beatles 5 Pussy 2

Case closed, Beatles win.

:)

[Useruser666]

Jim, I never thought you could be a bigger homer of anything more than Steve Francis, but I have been proven wrong. Tell me you would "hit" a 62 year-old man over a pussy and I'll poke myself in the eye.

The question about who has influenced young men, pussy should outscore the Beatles by about 1 billion to 1. Pussy has influenced more musicians than the Beatles have and was also a major driving force behind their song writing and success.

[Jimcs50]

Jim, I never thought you could be a bigger homer of anything more than Steve Francis, but I have been proven wrong. Tell me you would "hit" a 62 year-old man over a pussy and I'll poke myself in the eye.

The question about who has influenced young men, pussy should outscore the Beatles by about 1 billion to 1. Pussy has influenced more musicians than the Beatles have and was also a major driving force behind their song writing and success.



I was being facitious..

[SpursWoman]

:lmao @ User!



:makeout :lol

[Taco]

I am not sure, I do not think I have seen millions of people screaming at pussy before, so the Beatles might be better than pussy.

Let's examine this a bit closer.

A. Has pussy been on the Ed Sullivan show?

No, the Beatles have. Beatles 1 Pussy 0

B. Has pussy had 30 # 1 songs?

No, the Beatles have. Beatles 2 Pussy 0

C. Has pussy influenced millions of young men?

Yes, Beatles 3 Pussy 1

D. Has pussy been imitated over and over?

Well, yes, but as with the Beatles, they did a lousy job. Beatles 4 Pussy 2

E. Does Pussy look better with hair on it?

No, Beatles 5 Pussy 2

Case closed, Beatles win.

:)


:lmao :oops :lmao

[CommanderMcBragg]

Sorry, I guess I'm just not into today's music that's all but I am into today's pussy. While music tastes may change, I don't think a man's taste for the female taco ever will.

[Clandestino]

jim needs some viagra or cialis bc he now loves the beatles more than pussy!!!

[SPARKY]

While pussy in general is fairly hard to knock, some pussy in particular can definitely be overrated.

[MannyIsGod]

I am not sure, I do not think I have seen millions of people screaming at pussy before, so the Beatles might be better than pussy.

Let's examine this a bit closer.

A. Has pussy been on the Ed Sullivan show?

No, the Beatles have. Beatles 1 Pussy 0

B. Has pussy had 30 # 1 songs?

No, the Beatles have. Beatles 2 Pussy 0

C. Has pussy influenced millions of young men?

Yes, Beatles 3 Pussy 1

D. Has pussy been imitated over and over?

Well, yes, but as with the Beatles, they did a lousy job. Beatles 4 Pussy 2

E. Does Pussy look better with hair on it?

No, Beatles 5 Pussy 2

Case closed, Beatles win.

:)


:lmao

classic.

[Useruser666]

Sorry Jim, but when you rate something higher than pussy I require a :wink after it.

McBragg, I didn't say today's music was better, just that the Beatles were overrated.

[Jimcs50]

Sorry Jim, but when you rate something higher than pussy I require a :wink after it.

McBragg, I didn't say today's music was better, just that the Beatles were overrated.

I am NOT winking at a man!!!

Thankyou for asking though.

:smokin

[Useruser666]

http://www.ratw.com/issues/1/pm.jpg

Oh Jim, you wouldn't tell me that would you?! :lol

[IceColdBrewski]

From what I understand, it was Yoko Ono's pussy that drove the wedge between them.

The moral of the story: Pussy always wins.

[Jimcs50]

From what I understand, it was Yoko Ono's pussy that drove the wedge between them.

The moral of the story: Pussy always wins.


Pussy is the devil, Bobby Boucher!!!

[Jimcs50]

http://www.ratw.com/issues/1/pm.jpg

Oh Jim, you wouldn't tell me that would you?! :lol

No, not Paul or Brad.

:)

[ShoogarBear]

Well, I for one am glad that the FCC cracked down on Super Bowl immorality and instead of bare titties we get nice family songs about transvestite potheads.

[LuvBones]

I was wondering why a thread about Paul McCartney got to be a hot topic... upon reading it, I understand why.. :lol

[MsMcGillyCutty]

I still think he's a real cutie.

[johnny00]

Not only were the Beatles overrated, Jim Morrison was all hype and Led Zepplin?... a corporate publicity stunt.

[JoeChalupa]

The lizard king rocks.

[Spurminator]

I liked the halftime show. I think it was a good choice by the organizers... there will always be some who don't like the performer, but Paul McCartney has about as wide an appeal as anyone you could expect to sign up.

[Clandestino]

I liked the halftime show. I think it was a good choice by the organizers... there will always be some who don't like the performer, but Paul McCartney has about as wide an appeal as anyone you could expect to sign up.

bullshit! he is a 50+ crowd... so, i take it singing about marijuana is a family friendly show now???

[Spurminator]

Paul McCartney is not exclusively for 50 year olds. That's ridiculous. Beatles music is still very popular with college age people.


so, i take it singing about marijuana is a family friendly show now???

Uh, didn't you suggest Guns 'n' Roses?

[Useruser666]

I think they should do a magic show, or a car or motorcycle stunt show.

[Jimcs50]

My son and his friends in Middle School like the Beatles, as well as all classic rock..

Taste and being young are not mutually exclusive.

[FromWayDowntown]

They really should bring back "Up With People." :rolleyes

If you can even recall the "Up With People" halftime days (or some of the other schlock that used to be Super Bowl halftime entertainment), you'd realize that McCartney is among the very best acts the NFL has come up with.

I'm still struggling with the concept of the Beatles being overrated. I respect the opinion, but vehemently disagree with it (if that makes any sense). I suspect that if you talked to most modern "musicians," you'd find a large amount of respect/reverence for the Beatles. Too many current bands have Beatles covers in their shows or Beatles influences in their music for that not to be true.

[Clandestino]

Paul McCartney is not exclusively for 50 year olds. That's ridiculous. Beatles music is still very popular with college age people.


no, not exclusively for 50 years old...i'm sure some 40 and 60 year olds like him too...

[Useruser666]

They really should bring back "Up With People." :rolleyes

If you can even recall the "Up With People" halftime days (or some of the other schlock that used to be Super Bowl halftime entertainment), you'd realize that McCartney is among the very best acts the NFL has come up with.

I'm still struggling with the concept of the Beatles being overrated. I respect the opinion, but vehemently disagree with it (if that makes any sense). I suspect that if you talked to most modern "musicians," you'd find a large amount of respect/reverence for the Beatles. Too many current bands have Beatles covers in their shows or Beatles influences in their music for that not to be true.

The Beatles are overrated.

Springsteen is overrated.

Oh let the shit hit the fan! :lol

[Clandestino]

The Beatles are overrated.

Springsteen is overrated.

Oh let the shit hit the fan! :lol

"the boss" is definitely overrated...

the beatles weren't overrated bc their music has influenced many musicians..

however, paul mcartney was boring as hell..and he, by himself, is not the beatles... by himself, he is and was BORING!

[Shelly]

Beatles--they don't bother me.

I HATE Springsteen so I will be ducking from the fan along with you.

Why do we need a half-time show anyway?

[Clandestino]

Why do we need a half-time show anyway?

yeah, why can't they just have the "Quick Change" duo from the Spurs halftime!

[Shelly]

works for me.

[Useruser666]

How about 30 minutes of commercials?

[SpursWoman]

How about 30 minutes of commercials?

:lol :lol




Springsteen sings like he's trying to pinch one off ... I didn't like Bob Dylan for the same reason.


:nerd

[Jimcs50]

The Beatles are overrated.

Springsteen is overrated.

Oh let the shit hit the fan! :lol


:hang

[FromWayDowntown]

I guess if you're arguing that the Beatles being the most influential force in modern music history does not mean that they are the greatest musicians who ever lived, as some seem to think, then yeah, they are overrated. (that's a constipated way to express that thought, sorry).

Sort of like anyone who would argue that Tim Duncan is the best athlete ever would overrate him.

I would agree, though, that among the Beatles, McCartney was not the most dynamic performer.

[Useruser666]

I guess if you're arguing that the Beatles being the most influential force in modern music history does not mean that they are the greatest musicians who ever lived, as some seem to think, then yeah, they are overrated. (that's a constipated way to express that thought, sorry).

Sort of like anyone who would argue that Tim Duncan is the best athlete ever would overrate him.

I would agree, though, that among the Beatles, McCartney was not the most dynamic performer.

LOL FWD! I like some of the Beatles songs. I just don't think they are worth jumping off a cliff for like some seem to think. It's also anoying hearing about all the anthologies that come out after every band member farts. I can't understand people who treat their stuff like holy scripture.

[Jimcs50]

You have to put them in perspective. When they played, the technology was in in the infant stage. They had 3 amps and a set of drums...so naturally their sound will not be impressive, but the songs and the rifs and chords that they wrote are still used and still influence muscians even today.

They have the most famous chord in the history of music in Hard days Night.

[Clandestino]

You have to put them in perspective. When they played, the technology was in in the infant stage. They had 3 amps and a set of drums...so naturally their sound will not be impressive, but the songs and the rifs and chords that they wrote are still used and still influence muscians even today.

They have the most famous chord in the history of music in Hard days Night.

ANDDDD! jim would rather listen to the beatles than have pussy!!! you can't forget that! hahaha!

[Jimcs50]

ANDDDD! jim would rather listen to the beatles than have pussy!!! you can't forget that! hahaha!



depends on the pussy.


:smokin

[Duff McCartney]

even you loved the beatles...this was only paul... and a boring as hell 62 year old paul at that.. he just stood there playing the guitar..then sat down and played the piano... BORING!!!

News flash...even a 22 year old Paul did the same thing. The Beatles weren't ones to dance on stage.

[Useruser666]

They are still overrated! :p

[Duff McCartney]

no, not exclusively for 50 years old...i'm sure some 40 and 60 year olds like him too...

Or 21 year olds like myself.

[Duff McCartney]

Springsteen is overrated.

Can't argue with that one...I never understood much of his appeal. Maybe because I'm not from New Joysey.

I'd also like to add Phish, DMB, and Grateful Dead to that list.

[Duff McCartney]

LOL FWD! I like some of the Beatles songs. I just don't think they are worth jumping off a cliff for like some seem to think. It's also anoying hearing about all the anthologies that come out after every band member farts. I can't understand people who treat their stuff like holy scripture.

They've had 3 Anthologies....yeah they sure come out with millions of them.

[MannyIsGod]

I have no problems with some beattles stuff, and but I geniuenly like Lennon's and Harrisons solo work better. Paul has some ok stuff as well.

Overrated? sure, but then there isnt' a group or singer out there that isn't overrated by SOMEBODY.

Oh and don't knock dylan or bruce, they're fucking awesome.

[Duff McCartney]

Overrated? sure, but then there isnt' a group or singer out there that isn't overrated by SOMEBODY.

Agreed...kinda like me thinking Phish and DMB are overrated and you jizzing in your pants everytime you hear em.... :smokin

But I don't knock Dylan or Springsteen....Dylan I know is great..he's not overrated..I just don't particularly like everything he's done.

Springsteen...well I understand why people love him...but again I don't particularly like his stuff save Born To Run...that's a great song.

[SpursWoman]

Oh and don't knock dylan or bruce, they're fucking awesome.


They have absolutely ZERO appeal to me. They are most certainly not fucking awesome. :lol

[Shelly]

Ditto! I just can't get into that east coast style of music.

Dylan is only popular because the children of the 60s were too stoned to realize they couldn't understand wtf he was saying. :spin

[Useruser666]

Bruce is overrated.

You want to know how to tell if you like an overrated musician?

If you think it's cool to like them.

[Kori Ellis]

Ditto! I just can't get into that east coast style of music.

Ditto again.

I can't stand Dylan or Springsteen. When I was in college, my friend was Springsteen's assistant and we had so many opportunities to see him free and I always turned it down.

[Kori Ellis]

Oh .. and the Beatles and Elvis suck too. :)

[Useruser666]

Oh .. and the Beatles and Elvis suck too. :)

http://www.nooksandniches.com/ProductImages/ourname/troublemug.gif

[SpursWoman]

:lol :lol

[FromWayDowntown]

Overrated? -- I can see it. I absolutely disagree, but I can see the argument.

But "the Beatles suck?" WTF? (I'm assuming the smiley face indicates you're joking, but just in case -- my panties are definitely in a wad now . . . .) To go back to my analogy: saying the Beatles suck is like saying Tim Duncan sucks. You may not like the game, but you can't deny the substance.

[Useruser666]

I can deny the substance. :lol

[SpursWoman]

I can deny the substance. :lol



Well, I guess I couldn't deny it if I actually did live in a Yellow Submarine.....yah, yah, yah.


:lol :lol

[MannyIsGod]

I hate that fucking song.

[Useruser666]

I hate that fucking song.

OMG Manny how could you hate any song by the Beatles! Blasmifizer!

[Jimcs50]

Ringo singing a song does not count

[SpursWoman]

:lmao

[Duff McCartney]

I like it for it was...another one of songs Paul wrote before he went to bed.

[Ocotillo]

The Super Bowl goes beyond the standard sports demographic. The commercials are an event for some people. Some people get into the halftime show. And oh yeah, there's the game too. Since most of the people at the game are there on a company dime they may not necessarily be interested in what an eighteen year old would like to see.

McCartney was good and I prefer the single artist rather than the "all stars" from different genres of music jammin' on stage.

Spare me the Jay Z, Slash, Earth Wind and Fire, Dolly Parton and Jewel singing "I'm just a Love Machine".

[TheMrPeanut]

I enjoyed the show but I'm also a big Beatles fan.

[Spurminator]

I can see not liking Dylan... but I defy anyone to listen to "Girl from the North Country" and tell me they don't like that song.

I defy it!!

[SpursWoman]

I loved Aerosmith ... but I'm sure a lot of people don't like them, either. :)

[Jimcs50]

I loved Aerosmith ... but I'm sure a lot of people don't like them, either. :)


Who the fuck does not like Aerosmith???


* Glaring at User*

[Guru of Nothing]

Who the fuck does not like Aerosmith???


* Glaring at User*

I liked the album Toys in the Attic, plus a few other songs from their early days. Everything they have done over the past 15-20 years has absolutely sucked.

But, that's just my very humble opinion.

[Jimcs50]

I liked the album Toys in the Attic, plus a few other songs from their early days. Everything they have done over the past 15-20 years has absolutely sucked.

But, that's just my very humble opinion.


Have you heard Honkin' on Bobo?

Good CD.

[Duff McCartney]

Who the fuck does not like Aerosmith???


* Glaring at User*

I think they are hugely overrated. Dream On is an incredible song...one of the best..but the rest of their stuff was garbage.

Their version of Come Together is total crap.

[Useruser666]

Who the fuck does not like Aerosmith???


* Glaring at User*

Who is Aerosmith?
















:lol

Jimmy's Got A Gun!

[Shelly]

Toys in the Attic is a great album. I love their early stuff.

[SpursWoman]

Jimmy's Got A Gun!



Jimmy? ;)























*ahem*Janie*ahem*

[Useruser666]

Jimmy? ;)


*ahem*Janie*ahem*

Uh, it's a play on the title and Jimcs50's name. *ahem*Jimmy*ahem* :p

[SpursWoman]

Uh, it's a play on the title and Jimcs50's name. *ahem*Jimmy*ahem* :p



....and I spoiled the joke. :depressed



Sorry, Lord of the Thighs (http://www.lyricsfreak.com/a/aerosmith/4269.html). :oops :lol

[Useruser666]

That Aerosmith is overrated! :lol

[Shelly]

I thought Paul was dead.

[Clandestino]

Okay, fine... major consensus..Beatles WERE cool... the Beatles music is still cool.. HOWEVER, Paul is not the beatles..he is one fucking boring dude on stage lip synching!

[Clandestino]

I thought Paul was dead.

He is! You didn't see his lame ass on stage?