Question for Palin Supporters

[George Gervin's Afro]

Why is it that Obama is supposed to answer for everything in his past yet you are very quiet about the Dems digging in Plain's past? All I have heard from your mouth pieces is that the 'Dems are attacking Plain' when they are simply trying to get into her backround. Her past deserves as much scrutiny as does Obama's right?

[boutons_]

"depends on whose ox is getting gored"

aka, double standard

book banning is a standard procedure in .... Islamic theocracies.

But it's OK if Palin does it.

[smeagol]

aka, double standard

Double standard applies for Dems too.

[Viva Las Espuelas]

hey, i'm all for digging for something that's there if it's there. i'm not a blind follower like a lot of people are. one thing that should stand out in this discussion is that at least palin, or mccain for that matter,(gee, i thought mccain was running for office) isn't threatening litigation for these or any other accusations. how come we don't see any of obamessiahs old friends? how come there is always hesitation when anyone questions obamessiah about his associates?

[George Gervin's Afro]

hey, i'm all for digging for something that's there if it's there. i'm not a blind follower like a lot of people are. one thing that should stand out in this discussion is that at least palin, or mccain for that matter,(gee, i thought mccain was running for office) isn't threatening litigation for these or any other accusations. how come we don't see any of obamessiahs old friends? how come there is always hesitation when anyone questions obamessiah about his associates?

The right wing mouth pieces have been questioning Obama's associations going on 3 or 4 months. He has answered them but this doesn't seem to placate any of those asking. How many questions is enough? The immediate answer would be to most is to explain them and move on. It's obvious that the people questioning him aren't trying to 'vet' him rather they are trying to tarnish hin in anyway they can. Seems to me that if this is fair to do towards Obama then it is most certainly fair game for Palin.

[boutons_]

"hesitation when anyone questions obamessiah about his associates"

Who's hesitating?

"isn't threatening litigation for these or any other accusations"

what accusations? The shit dug up on Palin are facts, not accusations.

[Viva Las Espuelas]

you could very easily ask........

The left wing mouth pieces have been questioning Palin's associations going on 3 or 4 weeks. She has answered them but this doesn't seem to placate any of those asking. How many questions is enough? The immediate answer would be to most is to explain them and move on. It's obvious that the people questioning her aren't trying to 'vet' her rather they are trying to tarnish her in anyway they can. Seems to me that if this is fair to do towards Palin then it is most certainly fair game for Obama.......as well.

[boutons_]

HUSSEIN has been well vetted and is a known quantity. Nothing really there, so the McSame/Palin/fear-and-smear machine is telling lies about HUSSEIN.

Palin is being vetted, and the known, factual stuff is pretty fucking scary, so McSame/Palin are telling lies about themselves to hide their shit.

[101A]

HUSSEIN has been well vetted and is a known quantity. Nothing really there, so the McSame/Palin/fear-and-smear machine is telling lies about HUSSEIN.

Palin is being vetter, and the known, factual stuff is pretty fucking scary, so McSame/Palin are telling lies about themselves to hide their shit.

There is very little factual out there, there are, however, a bunch of rumors and lies made up by the left:

NewsWeek Fact Check (http://www.newsweek.com/id/157986)

[TheMadHatter]

No lies. Palin is a fucking nutjob and her record is atrocious. If you thought Kerry was a flip-flopper, this woman takes the cake.

[Anti.Hero]

If the media questioned Obama as much as they are digging into Palin's past, he would get massacred on T.V.

Alas, he isn't.

They are all scum, they are politicians, but it is obvious what is going on.

[Sec24Row7]

HUSSEIN has been well vetted and is a known quantity. Nothing really there, so the McSame/Palin/fear-and-smear machine is telling lies about HUSSEIN.

Palin is being vetted, and the known, factual stuff is pretty fucking scary, so McSame/Palin are telling lies about themselves to hide their shit.

I love how they haven't told you what the pet name for Palin is so you actually have to use it instead of something else like you do for "McSame"

[balli]

I love how they haven't told you what the pet name for Palin is so you actually have to use it instead of something else like you do for "McSame"

I've been referring to her as an evil cunt, mostly. Not so much a nickname I guess, as it is an apt description.

[2centsworth]

Why is it that Obama is supposed to answer for everything in his past yet you are very quiet about the Dems digging in Plain's past? All I have heard from your mouth pieces is that the 'Dems are attacking Plain' when they are simply trying to get into her backround. Her past deserves as much scrutiny as does Obama's right?

I don't like the slime from either direction. Calling Obama the Anti-Christ who is trying to implement Sharia Law is just as bad as calling Palin a slut who is covering up all sorts of things.

I'm down for rational debate, but we live in big world.

[xrayzebra]

Start digging, as if Obama Bin Biden havent already sent an Army of lawyers and investigators into Alaska to find out when she had her last period, if it was painful what she eats. I am sure she will be well researched, searched,re-re-searched and any and all rocks and tundra turned over and over and over and over...........

While you are at it, google Obama and Acorn.

[xrayzebra]

I've been referring to her as an evil cunt, mostly. Not so much a nickname I guess, as it is an apt description.


you mean like dumbass huffers and puffers.

[Anti.Hero]

Yeah, since when does the Agent of Change, the new breed, young blood politician send his army of lawyers to go TMZ blitzkrieg Alaska...

[Wild Cobra]

Why is it that Obama is supposed to answer for everything in his past yet you are very quiet about the Dems digging in Plain's past? All I have heard from your mouth pieces is that the 'Dems are attacking Plain' when they are simply trying to get into her backround. Her past deserves as much scrutiny as does Obama's right?
Problem is, nearly everything the left has attacked Palin with so far are outright lies and distortion of the truth. Maybe if you guys found some real problems with govorner Palin, us conservatives and republicans might listen to you guys instead of thinking "there's another dumb libtard." Obama does have real issues that should be discussed, but are entirely ignored by the alphabet news networks. They are so blatantly biased, we can call them:

ABC: All Barack Collaborators

NBC: Normal Barack Communicators

CBS: Clearly Barack Sponsors

CNN: Communist News Network

MSNBC: Most Sincere National Barack Cosponsors

I'm sure there's better ones, I just made most of those up.

[Wild Cobra]

I've been referring to her as an evil cunt, mostly. Not so much a nickname I guess, as it is an apt description.

It just shows how dumb you are. You should check the facts instead of blindly believeing what other people of dark hearts lie about her.

[George Gervin's Afro]

Problem is, nearly everything the left has attacked Palin with so far are outright lies and distortion of the truth. Maybe if you guys found some real problems with govorner Palin, us conservatives and republicans might listen to you guys instead of thinking "there's another dumb libtard." Obama does have real issues that should be discussed, but are entirely ignored by the alphabet news networks. They are so blatantly biased, we can call them:

ABC: All Barack Collaborators

NBC: Normal Barack Communicators

CBS: Clearly Barack Sponsors

CNN: Communist News Network

MSNBC: Most Sincere National Barack Cosponsors

I'm sure there's better ones, I just made most of those up.

SHe's a flip flopper and has questionable judgement.

[Mr. Body]

The media is gobbling McCain's cock and loves them some Palin.

They helped elect Bush twice. Not surprising they're in the tank again.

[George Gervin's Afro]

The media is gobbling McCain's cock and loves them some Palin.

They helped elect Bush twice. Not surprising they're in the tank again.


Since when did the right wingers become such hypersensitive sissies?

[efrem1]

Why is it that Obama is supposed to answer for everything in his past yet you are very quiet about the Dems digging in Plain's past? All I have heard from your mouth pieces is that the 'Dems are attacking Plain' when they are simply trying to get into her backround. Her past deserves as much scrutiny as does Obama's right?

Hey it is fair game for the media to dig into Palin's past. I just thiink that Obama's religious left buddies and his Marxist friends will make life miserable for we and our families by providing everything out of Washington at our expense.

"It is not to much to say that the Constitution is gone."

Justice James McReynolds 1936

[Aggie Hoopsfan]

Why is it that Obama is supposed to answer for everything in his past yet you are very quiet about the Dems digging in Plain's past? All I have heard from your mouth pieces is that the 'Dems are attacking Plain' when they are simply trying to get into her backround. Her past deserves as much scrutiny as does Obama's right?

Spare me.

When has Obama ever had to answer for shit like Ayers? All he's said is "I don't agree with he did, but he's a friend."

Howabout Rezko? When is the press going to get to ask the hard questions? All I see is Obama ducking the issue, and the media doing nothing to call him on it.

Spare me the whining.

[Yonivore]

Why is it that Obama is supposed to answer for everything in his past yet you are very quiet about the Dems digging in Plain's past? All I have heard from your mouth pieces is that the 'Dems are attacking Plain' when they are simply trying to get into her backround. Her past deserves as much scrutiny as does Obama's right?
None of the alleged scandals involving Obama have gotten any in-depth exposure by the media. They take his explanation at face value and then, he throws the unsavory character to whom he's been connected under the bus...from his bigoted grandmother to Rezko to Wright.

Ayers is another story. An unrepetent terrorist that Obama still considers a friend. I think that would warrant some pretty detailed explanation. But, the media can't be bothered with that now...no, they're North to Alaska.

[Wild Cobra]

SHe's a flip flopper and has questionable judgement.

Please tell us your evidence. As for the bridge, she supported a state funded project and rejected the federal project. That's not a flip-flop. Is there something else?

[Wild Cobra]

None of the alleged scandals involving Obama have gotten any in-depth exposure by the media.

You are absolutely right.

They take Obama's explaination with no 'investigative reporting' and do all they can to report dirt on Palin.

Why don't the libtards see this?

[ManuTim_best of Fwiendz]

Spare me.

When has Obama ever had to answer for shit like Ayers? All he's said is "I don't agree with he did, but he's a friend."




Ayers using terrorism, 40 years , is such a convenient stupid excuse on Obama's part. The fact Ayers still maintains his views, makes me wonder how much Obama just sat there in his meetings with that guy, nodding his head on how America needs to be "changed."
His rhetoric and rebuttals smacks of a habitual liar , that he believes his lies which is why comes off so sincere on camera. The fact that it's stated in a later biography edition of his books that accounts are a composite of his life and experiences prove he is a bullshit artist. And just this week he says "I thought about joining the army -- but there were no wars" was the stupidest fucking thing I've ever heard. After the whole country was inundated with McCain's POW experience proves that this unknown will re-invent himself to please the crowd and popular opinion.


Howabout Rezko? When is the press going to get to ask the hard questions? All I see is Obama ducking the issue, and the media doing nothing to call him on it.

yeah, that Rezko thing should be constantly brought up.
After digging dirt on Palin, and then digging into Obama, the "negatives" on not to trust Palin, are so weak and reaching. The uses of "per diem" ? Give me a fucking break.
Meanwhile Obama's information is incredibly detailed, the only credit you can give his campaign is how they've managed to quell and suppress these legitimate red flags as "harmless" "guilt by association" relying on people to actually buy his shit. Why should we take his word for it?


The report on how he ignored low income residents protesting his bid for state senate, because of his connections with slumlords like Rezko, is pretty damning.
All he says is "I didn't know!" and he gets off the hook; and his game of "self-awareness" to counter-act criticism with his response "it was the biggest boneheaded mistake of my life" is bullshit. He must think we're really stupid. Meanwhile his 13th district that Obama was in charge of has been left unchanged and he proposes a bunch of flawed policies that play into these scumbags like Rezko hands.
People should really be waking up to judging what kind of character Obama has from these reports. His ties to these fuckers reveal how this guy is too passive and impressionable, regardless if his patriotism has been called into question--unfairly or not.

To me he seems easily influenced on his world view when he says shit like "terrorist has legitimate" claims. It's obvious he listens to these left-anti war radicals, who politicize the war for the sake of their own agendas without objecting.

[ManuTim_best of Fwiendz]

[QUOTE=Yonivore;2761390]None of the alleged scandals involving Obama have gotten any in-depth exposure by the media.
[QUOTE]
You are absolutely right.

They take Obama's explaination with no 'investigative reporting' and do all they can to report dirt on Palin.

Why don't the libtards see this?

I surprisingly found a CNN on Obama's Chicago political start.

QPQedyt10To

Usually CNN is slanted, but nobody called Obama out for his "different kind of politics" he's stating now..his campaign is full of bullshit artists.


If we get anything out of this election, hopefully the media will be forced to reform their unbiased reporting despite the huge conglomerates pulling the strings. The boycotting of US weekly, etc. was encouraging.
MSNBC firing those two Obama cock suckers Matthews and Olberman, because of their ratings dips.
CNN changing its new slogan to "no bull, no bias" seems disingenuous but maybe they're forced to curb their liberal bias.

IMO MSNBC has probably been the shittiest newsreporting channel of them all in the last few years. I don't think that's gonna change with their empty gestures just to get ratings back.

[boutons_]

"do all they can to report dirt on Palin." because there is plenty of dirt, current dirt, on Palin. as always the fear-and-smear attack machine loves to dish it out, but are too chickenshit to take it.