PDA

View Full Version : Meanwhile, in the USA backyard...



nkdlunch
09-23-2008, 10:11 AM
meanwhile in the backyard, as USA cleans up mess in their kitchen....

Moscow strengthens presence in U.S.' backyard
Answering eastward press by Washington, Russia flashes arms, chums up with Bush foes in Latin America
By Alex Rodriguez

Chicago Tribune correspondent

September 23, 2008

MOSCOW—When the Bush administration dispatched two U.S. warships to the Black Sea to deliver humanitarian aid to war-stricken Georgia, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin reacted with indignation and a warning.

"There will be an answer," Putin said during a visit to Uzbekistan. Asked to elaborate, he replied, "You'll see." :wow

This month, the Kremlin has made it clear what Putin meant. It deployed two Russian strategic bombers to Venezuela to patrol Caribbean waters earlier this month, and on Monday it dispatched a navy squadron to Venezuela for military exercises.

The appearance of the Tu-160 bombers and the expected arrival of four Russian warships in a Latin American country run by one of the Bush administration's most outspoken foes, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, marks Moscow's clearest signal yet that it intends to ramp up its influence in Latin America if Washington persists in setting root in territory the Kremlin regards as its backyard.

"It may look unfriendly to Americans, but now you can have the same feeling as we had in Russia," said Andrei Klimov, a Putin loyalist and deputy chairman of the foreign affairs committee for the Duma, Russia's lower chamber of parliament.

Though they posed no immediate military threat, the Russian bombers' visit marked the first such deployment in the Western Hemisphere since the Cold War. They returned last week to their base in Engels, Russia, but the Kremlin plans to send the bombers back to Venezuela for exercises with Chavez's forces in November.

Russian warships that left the naval port of Severomorsk on Monday, including the nuclear-powered cruiser Peter the Great, will also take part in those exercises.



Little real threat to U.S.
State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said earlier this month that the bombers' deployment was "something we will watch very closely." From a military standpoint, however, their appearance in Venezuela carries little significance. Though capable of carrying nuclear weapons, the bombers were not armed and were shadowed by NATO fighter jets over the Atlantic.

Nevertheless, their deployment, along with the departure of the warships Monday, signals the Kremlin's willingness to vent its fury over U.S. missile defense plans in Eastern Europe and NATO's eastward expansion by strengthening alliances with Latin American governments that dislike Washington.

From the viewpoint of Russians, it's hard to understand why a country that espouses Monroe Doctrine philosophy to safeguard its own corner of the world sees nothing awry with staking out territory in former Soviet republics.

"This can be seen as reciprocity," said Fyodor Lukyanov, editor of Russia in Global Affairs magazine. "The message is, if you don't respect our interests in neighboring countries, in what President [ Dmitry] Medvedev calls our sphere of privileged interests, then don't be surprised when we do the same in your sphere."

Until recently, the Kremlin has shown scant interest in Latin America. In 2001, Putin, then Russia's president, shut down Russia's sprawling electronic surveillance base near Havana, telling Russians that their country needed to devote its attention and money to its biggest trading partner—Europe.

However, as Russia has used its energy wealth to re-emerge as a geopolitical power in recent years, it has sought out alliances with faraway governments.

With Chavez becoming one of the Western Hemisphere's most problematic leaders for Washington, the Kremlin has nurtured stronger ties with him. Russia has sold Venezuela $4 billion in arms, including 24 Su-30 fighter jets.

Chavez also has expressed interest in buying as many as 20 anti-aircraft missile systems and three Russian submarines. And he has said he would welcome the establishment of Russian military bases in his country if Russia ever chose that path.

Russia's burgeoning friendship with Chavez has coincided with the Bush administration's push for a missile defense system based in Poland and the Czech Republic, as well as its strong support for NATO membership for former Soviet republics Georgia and Ukraine.


Talks with Havana
Venezuela isn't the only Latin American nation forging stronger ties with Moscow. Russian leaders have visited Havana twice in recent weeks to discuss economic cooperation in energy and other fields after Putin said this summer that Russia "should restore our position in Cuba."

And so far, the only other nation to join Russia in recognizing the statehood of Georgia's pro-Moscow breakaway enclaves, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, has been Nicaragua, led by leftist leader Daniel Ortega.

Klimov says Washington's actions in Russia's neighborhood are forcing the Kremlin to step up its forays into Latin America. "What can we do when surrounded by NATO forces? Of course, we have to find places in the world where we can have partners, who can help us in difficult times," he said.

Though Russia's renewed interest in Latin America may seem disquieting, some experts say Russia lacks the resources to take any actions that could be regarded as a genuine threat in the Western Hemisphere. Its military remains a shadow of its former self during the Soviet era, when the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 brought the Kremlin and Washington to the brink of nuclear war.

"Sending those bombers to Venezuela is simply a byproduct of the euphoria our leaders feel after the war in Georgia," said Marina Chumakova, director of the Political Studies Center at Moscow's Latin American Institute. "Russia has no extra money to spend on stirring up a crisis, no resources to become a strategic partner for these countries."

nkdlunch
09-23-2008, 10:12 AM
Tuesday » September 23 » 2008

Left-wing governments cut U.S. influence
Post Cold War United States doesn't care about region, political analyst says

Frank Jack Daniel
Reuters


Monday, September 22, 2008



CREDIT: Jorge Silva, Reuters
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said Russia's Tu-160 bomber was in his country to strengthen military ties and counter U.S. regional influences.

CARACAS -- Russian bombers swoop over the Caribbean, Bolivia and Venezuela expel American ambassadors and once-trusty Washington ally Honduras aligns with Cuba as Latin America's hard-left dents U.S. influence in its backyard.

Left-leaning governments, some openly antagonistic to the United States, now stretch from Patagonia to Central America with the only break in the Andes for Colombia and Peru.

Even moderate leftist governments in Brazil and Chile that value U.S. partnership have diversified commercial ties away from the superpower and increasingly embrace Europe and Asia.

Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez, who plans to hold joint military exercises soon with Russia, leads the most anti-U.S. government in the region and record oil revenues have augmented his clout. He is closely supported by Ecuador and Bolivia.

But while most other countries would not go so far, an overall trend toward Latin American independence from the United States has emerged in the last few years. The area displays new levels of self confidence, launching diplomatic, financial and defence organizations that exclude its northern neighbour, as nations enjoy greater economic freedom on the back of a commodities export boom.

"Latin America has changed," Chavez said at a South American summit Monday that eased tensions in a political crisis in Bolivia. "We are writing a new page in history."

The region seems largely united, relatively prosperous -- and happy to distance itself from a superpower that in the Cold War sometimes backed bloody military rulers but now sees few vital interests in South America.

"One of the reasons the United States has lost a great deal of influence in Latin America is that the United States doesn't care," said George Friedman of political risk group Stratfor.

Following the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, several of the civil wars and insurgencies that had torn apart countries like Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala and Peru died out. Military dictatorships in countries like Chile and Argentina gave way to democracies and Washington ceased to see Latin American leftists as a threat.

That disinterest is a factor in the rise of leftist governments, which after harsh economic times in the 1990s have won popularity by spending the profits of a boom in oil, farm produce and minerals on social services.

But U.S. interest may be reviving. Bolivia's President Evo Morales accused the U.S. ambassador of aiding protests and expelled him earlier this month, prompting Chavez to do the same.

Chavez's plan to welcome Russian planes and warships to Venezuela also makes him a bigger threat in the eyes of U.S. hardliners, who are pushing for tough action against him.

Honduras was a staunch U.S. ally in the Cold War and still hosts an American base. But the Central American nation joined an economic alliance with Venezuela and Cuba in August.

Monday, nine presidents met to back Bolivia, where Morales is struggling with violent opposition protests. It was the second such meeting this year -- and a snub to U.S.-based Organization of American States.

"Latin Americans are stepping in and managing their own crises, some of which the United States played a role in generating -- but not so much resolving," said Julia Sweig of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Russia's decision to send two long-range bombers to Venezuela, and its plan to hold navy exercises in the Caribbean in November may finally reawaken Washington's interest.

"If you want to see the United States' influence in Latin America increase, let the Americans start imagining a Russian threat in Latin America again," Friedman said.

© The Vancouver Sun 2008

clambake
09-23-2008, 10:15 AM
rebuilding the cold war with russia is sensible policy.

washingtonwizard
09-23-2008, 11:56 AM
difference is in the 1st cold war, it was USA who was getting rich and Russia who was going broke