PDA

View Full Version : You are the jury, you decide



Fabbs
10-01-2008, 10:49 AM
4 San Diego firemen were forced to drive a truck as part of the parade. The annual gay pride parade. Their boss is a gay woman. Previous years the city asked for volunteers only. This year the woman boss forced them to.

Will you award damages? I think 4 million is a joke but i certainly give them some amount for damages.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20080930-1851-bn30parade.html
Here is a picture of the boss and more on how it unfolded. Sounds like it was a gay male underboss who initially ordered the 4 to the parade. http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080919/news_1m19parade.html
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080919/images/parade140.jpg

ORION
10-01-2008, 10:56 AM
I would of wore a ski mask

Anti.Hero
10-01-2008, 10:57 AM
I thought that was a requirement for citizenship in Cali?

fatsack
10-01-2008, 11:25 AM
at least the music was probably good.

I. Hustle
10-01-2008, 11:26 AM
That is retarded. I would say they deserve the money. I guarantee that if it was flipped and it was a straight pride parade not only would they get that money but the one who made them would never work in any fire dept again and rally’s and crap would be going on all over the place. They deserve the money not because it was a gay thing but because they were forced to participate.
I don’t want to get started on the whole gay pride parade stuff and how dumb I think it is but this case is really really stupid.

BacktoBasics
10-01-2008, 11:28 AM
Setting gay rights back 20 years.

I. Hustle
10-01-2008, 11:32 AM
.

Blake
10-01-2008, 12:09 PM
Crushing straight guy rights bit by bit for the new millenium

there, fixed.

I. Hustle
10-01-2008, 12:19 PM
:lol

Extra Stout
10-01-2008, 01:49 PM
I'm not a fan of large punitive damages being awarded to plantiffs. The more appropriate response would be immediate termination of the assistant chiefs. That San Diego has not already taken that step tells me that the city ranks political pandering to interest groups over the treatment of its employees. I guess that's not surprising.

Slydragon
10-01-2008, 02:23 PM
Governor Arnold told them to...

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i196/Slydrag0n/gifs/StopWhining.jpg

ChumpDumper
10-01-2008, 02:52 PM
All four said they were subjected to catcalls and forced to watch simulated sex acts. They said the three-hour parade left them with multiple ailments, including headaches and anxiety. The horror.

Probably a good idea to reprimand or fire the chiefs who ordered this, but a parade is not a workplace, and the parade spectators aren't coworkers. I'm surprised the case got this far.

FromWayDowntown
10-01-2008, 02:54 PM
If they had been ordered to respond to a frivolous call at a home in which a party was going on and most of the partygoers had been gay (and just wanted some firefighters to show up, provoking the call) and the same thing had happened, would anyone think the City would be liable?

Blake
10-01-2008, 03:18 PM
All four said they were subjected to catcalls and forced to watch simulated sex acts. They said the three-hour parade left them with multiple ailments, including headaches and anxiety.

"It was worse than being in a 4 alarm fire, your Honor. We couldn't take watching all the guys dressed in Village People outfits while we saw girls that were manlier than Jack Palance.

Our job is to put out flames, your Honor.......not join them. I have a massive $2million headache and I'm getting another $2 million anxiety attack right now just thinking about it......"

JoeChalupa
10-01-2008, 03:24 PM
Pay them double-time and move on.

I. Hustle
10-01-2008, 03:40 PM
If they had been ordered to respond to a frivolous call at a home in which a party was going on and most of the partygoers had been gay (and just wanted some firefighters to show up, provoking the call) and the same thing had happened, would anyone think the City would be liable?

WOW your name suits you. That is by far not the same thing.

bus driver
10-01-2008, 03:46 PM
Pay them double-time and move on.

+1 :wakeup

ChumpDumper
10-01-2008, 04:21 PM
As part of any settlement, the plaintiffs are no longer allowed to use their jobs to pick up women.

baseline bum
10-01-2008, 04:22 PM
$4 million for driving a truck in a parade they disagreed with? Fire the boss for forcing them into it, but they don't deserve a cent.

Flight3107
10-01-2008, 04:31 PM
If they had been ordered to respond to a frivolous call at a home in which a party was going on and most of the partygoers had been gay (and just wanted some firefighters to show up, provoking the call) and the same thing had happened, would anyone think the City would be liable?


WTF? How is this and what happened even close to being comparable?

Brutalis
10-01-2008, 04:31 PM
Fire the dike, double the pay of the guys, ez pz.

Seriously as manly as a fireman is how fucked up is it your boss is dike? Jesus fucking Christ how lame.

ChumpDumper
10-01-2008, 04:35 PM
Seriously as manly as a fireman is how fucked up is it your boss is dike? Jesus fucking Christ how lame.Dikes are pretty manly. One would think manly men would be able to get through this horrible ordeal without suffering $4 million worth of gay-induced headaches.

I. Hustle
10-01-2008, 04:40 PM
The horror.

Probably a good idea to reprimand or fire the chiefs who ordered this, but a parade is not a workplace, and the parade spectators aren't coworkers. I'm surprised the case got this far.

It's the workplace when you are FORCED to drive the truck. The people out there may not have been co-workers but the people responsible for making them do that are. They subjected them to that.
It would be the same if the captain or whatever was christian and forced them to participate in a church related event.

ChumpDumper
10-01-2008, 04:43 PM
It's the workplace when you are FORCED to drive the truck. The people out there may not have been co-workers but the people responsible for making them do that are. They subjected them to that.
It would be the same if the captain or whatever was christian and forced them to participate in a church related event.So the workplace is a public street?

The horror.


I got a headache reading this thread. Give me a million dollars.

Biernutz
10-01-2008, 04:45 PM
Because of the nature of the parade the crew of the truck should have been volunteers from the start.

I. Hustle
10-01-2008, 04:46 PM
So the workplace is a public street?

The horror.


I got a headache reading this thread. Give me a million dollars.

They got a portable workplace. They are in uniform and driving a city issued vehicle.

Spurminator
10-01-2008, 04:49 PM
They should be paid overtime and the chiefs should be reprimanded.

ChumpDumper
10-01-2008, 04:50 PM
Because of the nature of the parade the crew of the truck should have been volunteers from the start.I agree. I can't see why this should cost anybody $4 million though.

ChumpDumper
10-01-2008, 04:50 PM
They got a portable workplace. They are in uniform and driving a city issued vehicle.And?

I. Hustle
10-01-2008, 04:52 PM
And?

You said they weren't in the workplace. Well since they did not volunteer and were forced to do it that is your and.

FromWayDowntown
10-01-2008, 04:53 PM
WOW your name suits you. That is by far not the same thing.

It's not? In each case, they're directed to perform an act in furtherance of their work (in one case, responding to a call; in the other, driving a truck in a parade). In each case, when they arrive at the location, they're harassed by those who are in that location. In each case, the people doing the harassing are not within the control of the City. How, exactly, are the situations different?

I'd agree that it seems odd to have ordered the firefighters to attend the parade and I'd agree that such an order might reasonably expose the person giving the order to some sort of punishment.

I. Hustle
10-01-2008, 04:57 PM
It's not? In each case, they're directed to perform an act in furtherance of their work (in one case, responding to a call; in the other, driving a truck in a parade). In each case, when they arrive at the location, they're harassed by those who are in that location. In each case, the people doing the harassing are not within the control of the City. How, exactly, are the situations different?

.

you really reached out for that one. Still doesn't play though. Their job is to save lives. In the case where they went to your house to put out the fire, that was job related. They might not have wanted to see what y'all were doing but the fire needed to be put out in order to keep the fire from endangering lives.
As far as the parade goes that is a flame that no fire dept can put out. You go girl.

ChumpDumper
10-01-2008, 06:59 PM
You said they weren't in the workplace. Well since they did not volunteer and were forced to do it that is your and.So the workplace is the truck and the gays were outside the workplace.

Fair enough.

RashoFan
10-01-2008, 09:24 PM
I have seen the San Diego Gay Rights Parade and there was some crazy shit there.
Any parades were are invited to and that we attend are on a voluntary basis. The Chief should be reprimanded for an abuse of position and the Fire Fighters, give them OT pay. $4 million Dollars??? C'mon guys...ya giving the rest of us a bad name and that can negatively effect how the publics views us.

Fabbs
10-02-2008, 08:49 PM
Can you hear Johny Cockroach now? "Just give me 4 gay jurors, that's all I'm asking for."

Jury in gay-pride parade suit indicates trouble reaching consensus
UNION-TRIBUNE

2:14 p.m. October 2, 2008

SAN DIEGO – A jury deliberating whether four San Diego city firefighters were sexually harassed during last year's gay pride parade asked the judge Thursday morning about the amount of jurors needed to reach a verdict.
The question, submitted to the judge about 10 a.m., was quickly answered: at least nine jurors need to agree on a count in order to reach a verdict in a civil trial.

The panel, which heard two weeks of testimony, started deliberations at 9 a.m. Wednesday.
The plaintiffs – firefighters Alex Kane, Chad Allison, Capt. Jason Hewitt and Capt. John Ghiotto – said they were subjected to sexually charged scenes and lewd comments while riding a fire engine during the parade, then mistreated at work after filing complaints.

The attorney representing the firefighters has said his clients each deserve $500,000 to $1 million from the city of San Diego.

Other firefighters testified they were not offended by the crowd's behavior and did not see any spectators approach the fire department vehicles.

The jury continued deliberations Thursday afternoon after returning from a lunch break.

MrChug
10-02-2008, 09:22 PM
They SUED??? How gay!!!!