PDA

View Full Version : Commentary: America's chilling future



SpursFanFirst
10-02-2008, 10:03 AM
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/01/beck.future/index.html

NEW YORK (CNN) -- Dear America:

Happy 300th Birthday!

It's 2076 and we've just invented the time-fax machine. (Actually, "we" didn't invent the time-fax machine, the State did -- they pretty much control everything now.)

I'm faxing this back to you in 2008 because that seems to be the year we had the best chance to reverse our course and get back to the vision laid out by our founding fathers -- a vision that didn't include the government being in the insurance business.

I don't have a lot of time (the State only gives us one 30-minute break per day) so let me give you some advice: Stop worrying so much about who runs the country and start worrying about who runs your towns, your states, and your Congress.

I know you're all distracted by the presidential election, but for all the money and time poured into it, the truth is that you're choosing between two roads that will lead you to the same destination. Sure, one may be the Autobahn and the other a two-lane highway, but you'll end up at the same place either way.

Decades of Republicans and Democrats alike have all chipped in to lead you to where you are today. Believing that one person, from either party, can change that by themselves is a big mistake.

Presidents are like captains of a large ship: They can map out a course and shout out orders, but without the trust and hard work of the people who actually move the rudders, their commands mean nothing.

In retrospect, the lack of trust and confidence you now have in your leaders was really the root cause of everything that's happened since. While our founding fathers designed a brilliant system of checks and balances, separation of powers and democratic elections, trust was the one thing they couldn't mandate in the Constitution.

Unfortunately, it's also the foundation upon which everything else is built and once it began to erode, our whole house inevitably began to crumble.

Looking back now, it's pretty obvious that our trust in government declined at about the same rate as our partisanship increased. People became so concerned about getting their party into power at any cost that the truth didn't even seem to matter anymore.

That's probably one of the reasons why George Washington hated the idea of political parties so much. Here's what he said about them in his 1796 farewell speech:

"The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty."

I know that George had a habit for using big words, so allow me to translate into 2008 English: Political parties that put their own success over that of the country's will be the death of America.

If you don't believe him yet, just wait a few more years...you're about to see firsthand how right he was. After all, if power corrupts, then the kind of absolute power gained by political parties (and feared by Washington) corrupts absolutely.

The best advice I can give you is to stop thinking in terms of left and right and start thinking in terms of right and wrong. Demand the best leaders possible, and then demand the best out of them.

Believe me, when you see what's coming your way, you'll realize how little the donkey and the elephant really ever mattered. Oh and while we're on politics, one quick thing that I'm sure you're curious about: Yes, Robert Byrd is still in the Senate. He's 159, but doesn't look a day over 91.

Now, let's talk about the economy. Let me see if I have this right: Money and power made people greedy, so you decided to hand over a bunch of money and power to greedy politicians instead. Smart! After using that money to nationalize a bunch of banks, mortgage companies and insurance companies, they moved on to bigger things.

The airlines came first -- we just couldn't live without them. Then it was the automakers (Detroit would've died), health care (they said they could manage it better), and eventually, the oil companies (I'm not sure where all of those "windfall profits" have gone).

The idea behind it all (an idea that was eventually turned into law with the passage of the Securities Exchange Act of 2011) was to "socialize losses" by spreading them out among all taxpayers. The pain, our leaders argued, would be minimal that way.

They were right. At least until the bills came due. See, we didn't actually have any of the money we were promising everyone; we were borrowing it.

It didn't take long before so many of our tax dollars were going toward interest payments that we couldn't fund even the most basic of government programs without massive tax increases on everyone. People now work most of the year just to pay Uncle Sam (or, as we now call him, "Comrade Sam").

I hear the State censors coming, so let me leave you with a few other quick things:

• Good call on not worrying about protecting our borders. That works out really well for you in 2019.

• You might want to spend a little less time worrying about carbon and a little more time worrying about Iran. We're now in a new mini-Ice Age but, believe me, Iran isn't using their nukes to warm any homes. (PS The International Atomic Energy Agency just revealed to you that Iran appears to be refitting their long-range missiles to carry nuclear payloads. Did you think they were joking or were you just too busy with lipsticks and pigs to notice?)

• The currency of the future is energy. Those who have it are thriving and those who don't -- well, let's just leave it at that. Drill for all the oil you can, but you also better start seriously looking for some other options.

In closing, remember this golden rule and you should be fine: Your Constitution will never fail you, but your leaders will. Be wary of anyone who tries to convince you that it's the other way around.

Best wishes (you're going to need them),

Worker 2744A

PS It's not all socialist doom and gloom here in the future. We just thawed Ted Williams' cryogenically frozen body and he hit 87 home runs for the North Team!

SpursFanFirst
10-02-2008, 10:04 AM
Sure, it's Glenn Beck, and I'm sure plenty of people out there think he's nuts...
but through this article, he makes a lot of good points.

Findog
10-02-2008, 10:08 AM
/Glenn Beck

Anti.Hero
10-02-2008, 10:09 AM
Hellls yeah. I knew Ted would make a comeback.

Anti.Hero
10-02-2008, 10:09 AM
/Glenn Beck


ewwww He's on that side. What he says must not have any truth to it!!

2centsworth
10-02-2008, 10:10 AM
/Glenn Beck

dismiss any opinions from the other team. I think you proved the point of the article.

Findog
10-02-2008, 10:17 AM
dismiss any opinions from the other team. I think you proved the point of the article.

If I want an intelligent conservative opinion, I'll read George Will, or some of William S. Buckley's old stuff.

SpursFanFirst
10-02-2008, 10:23 AM
I'm never really sure how to take Beck...Sometimes I really do think he might be nuts :lol
But he usually has some pretty good arguments.

I've always been against big government...and against the government getting too involved in our lives.
Abortion, for example...Personally, I'm against it except in a couple of cases, but I also don't want the government telling me what I can and can't do with my body. It's a tough call for me.

In this article, Beck mentions healthcare, and that's obviously one of Obama's platforms. I can understand there are so many people out there without proper insurance and whatnot, and it bothers me that they can't get the care they need...but at the same time, this is just another way for the government to take control of our everyday lives.

It's as if they're trying to make us so dependent on them that we can no longer take care of ourselves, and that scares the crap out of me!

Bartleby
10-02-2008, 10:28 AM
Beck is a true visionary, but that's the advantage of having a time machine. You can make shit up and say, "I told you so" before it even happens.

Thunder Dan
10-02-2008, 10:41 AM
who honestly thinks we will still be strictly using oil then? Shit, we will probably be out of it by then, but I'm sure someone will come up with something. Hasn't this writer ever seen Back to The Future 2 where they use garbage?

I wish he would talk a little more about the massive amount of debt we will be in and how that will limit any growth we might of had

SnakeBoy
10-02-2008, 11:05 AM
I'm never really sure how to take Beck...Sometimes I really do think he might be nuts :lol


Oh he's nuts. Entertaining sometimes but he's on meds I'm sure.

101A
10-02-2008, 12:06 PM
Hey Beck, did they find a cure for AIDS, or those nagging little STD's? Let me know exactly when so I can stop using these fucking rubbers:depressed

He does make some good points, but his comments about Iran is just flat out stupid. If Iran wants nuclear weapons, then they should have them. Who are we to say they shouldnt? Russia has them, China has them, Pakistan has them, even Israel has them. But of all the countries in the world that has nuclear weapons, the only country that I would fear using them is America... and maybe Israel.


Iran's president has said he is willing to sacrifice 1/2 of his population if it meant the end of Israel. The day Iran has a nuclear weapon, IMO, is a different day for the world than every day that came before it.

Also, "Even Israel"?

Anti-Semite much?

Anti.Hero
10-02-2008, 12:12 PM
Hey Beck, did they find a cure for AIDS, or those nagging little STD's? Let me know exactly when so I can stop using these fucking rubbers:depressed

He does make some good points, but his comments about Iran is just flat out stupid. If Iran wants nuclear weapons, then they should have them. Who are we to say they shouldnt? Russia has them, China has them, Pakistan has them, even Israel has them. But of all the countries in the world that has nuclear weapons, the only country that I would fear using them is America... and maybe Israel.

Wow.

clambake
10-02-2008, 12:14 PM
Iran's president has said he is willing to sacrifice 1/2 of his population if it meant the end of Israel. The day Iran has a nuclear weapon, IMO, is a different day for the world than every day that came before it.

it would be even more frightening if he had any real power.

Aggie Hoopsfan
10-02-2008, 12:23 PM
If I want an intelligent conservative opinion, I'll read George Will, or some of William S. Buckley's old stuff.

Howabout instead of being such a bitch about who said it, you tell us all what you disagree with.

Cry Havoc
10-02-2008, 12:27 PM
If Iran wants nuclear weapons, then they should have them. Who are we to say they shouldnt? Russia has them, China has them, Pakistan has them, even Israel has them. But of all the countries in the world that has nuclear weapons, the only country that I would fear using them is America... and maybe Israel.


This is possibly one of the stupidest things I've ever read. Look, I normally think your posts make sense, but WOW. Do you know anything about Iran, at all?

Shastafarian
10-02-2008, 12:35 PM
Damn! I sure wish this guy had time-faxed us back when we were told there were WMD's in Iraq to assure us Iraq had no WMD's. Oh shit! I just realized this guy could've also led us on to the Big Brother-esque tendencies of the Bush Administration! Fuck, where were you 7 years ago buddy?


Oh wait. This is Glenn Beck and he supports the Iraq War and hasn't called the administration on arguably the most "state-controlled" policy they have. He supports illegal surveillance and the Patriot Act. Fucking hypocrite.

SpursFanFirst
10-02-2008, 12:50 PM
Hey Beck, did they find a cure for AIDS, or those nagging little STD's? Let me know exactly when so I can stop using these fucking rubbers:depressed

He does make some good points, but his comments about Iran is just flat out stupid. If Iran wants nuclear weapons, then they should have them. Who are we to say they shouldnt? Russia has them, China has them, Pakistan has them, even Israel has them. But of all the countries in the world that has nuclear weapons, the only country that I would fear using them is America... and maybe Israel.

:wow Ummmm What?!

SnakeBoy
10-02-2008, 01:00 PM
He supports illegal surveillance and the Patriot Act. Fucking hypocrite.

So does Obama.

InRareForm
10-02-2008, 01:42 PM
message boards (especially here) are becoming so predictable with the replies when they see or hear a name of who wrote an article, lol.

101A
10-02-2008, 01:50 PM
it would be even more frightening if he had any real power.


Oh, that's right; he's the elected official without power; it's the unelected Religious leaders that run things.

Thanks for reminding me.

Makes me feel much better.

Shastafarian
10-02-2008, 01:52 PM
So does Obama.

So what? What does that have to do with this thread? I don't agree with Obama on everything. FISA is one of those things. But Obama didn't come out with a column railing against a state-controlled nation while supporting measures that will get us there.